Re: rsync gnulib/automake

2014-01-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi Wayne Thanks a lot for the answers. I will then start with converting the build system to automake which makes the inclusion of single modules of gnulib (without including gnulib as a git submodule) already a lot easier and write the patch for the build system to build only the copy-tool

[Bug 10081] Multiple rsync instances conflict

2014-01-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10081 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Yu Okunev xaion...@gmail.com 2014-01-02 11:01:10 UTC --- I can write a patch. Is this required? I can make my modification to be optional, if this required. -- Configure bugmail:

Re: Changing permissions on existing backup source

2014-01-02 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2014-01-01 1:12 PM, Kevin Korb k...@sanitarium.net wrote: The files will not be transferred but they will be stored separately as new versions of the file even if the content is the same. Ok, so, 'stored separately' = take up additional space? which is what I want to avoid. Permissions

Re: Question about rsyncing to a slightly different folder structure on target

2014-01-02 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2014-01-01 2:02 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com mailto:cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: On the old server, dovecot is configured to just use .../example.com/user http://example.com/user for the

[Bug 10357] New: make check fails for xattr tests

2014-01-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10357 Summary: make check fails for xattr tests Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

[Bug 10357] make check fails for xattr tests

2014-01-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10357 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Šimerda (pavlix) psime...@redhat.com 2014-01-02 12:22:55 UTC --- Downstream bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032637 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug 10357] make check fails for xattr tests

2014-01-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10357 Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2

Re: Changing permissions on existing backup source

2014-01-02 Thread Kevin Korb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yep, if you change 1 you change the hard links in all of them. On 01/02/2014 06:09 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2014-01-01 1:12 PM, Kevin Korb k...@sanitarium.net wrote: The files will not be transferred but they will be stored separately as new

Re: Changing permissions on existing backup source

2014-01-02 Thread Dan Stromberg
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: If I change the permissions on the source maildirs, will this cause everything to be transferred again? Meaning, will rsync see everything as 'modified', thus creating a new copy of the entire mail store on the

Re: Changing permissions on existing backup source

2014-01-02 Thread Kevin Korb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Interesting list. I have a couple of suggestions I can offer... First, a new column for the old cp -al then rsync on top of it method that --link-dest mostly replaced. It is slower since all the hard links get made and then some get replaced or

Re: Changing permissions on existing backup source

2014-01-02 Thread Dan Stromberg
First off, thanks much for your suggestions. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Kevin Korb k...@sanitarium.net wrote: First, a new column for the old cp -al then rsync on top of it method that --link-dest mostly replaced. It is slower since all the hard links get made and then some get replaced

Re: Changing permissions on existing backup source

2014-01-02 Thread Kevin Korb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/02/2014 09:53 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote: First off, thanks much for your suggestions. ... First, a new column for the old cp -al then rsync on top of it method that --link-dest mostly replaced. It is slower since all the hard links get made