On Mon 13 Jul 2015, Andrew Gideon wrote:
On the other hand, I do confess that I am sometimes miffed at the waste
involved in a small change to a very large file. Rsync is smart about
moving minimal data, but it still stores an entire new copy of the file.
What's needed is a file system
And what's performance like? I've heard lots of COW systems performance
drops through the floor when there's many snapshots.
/kc
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:59:25AM +0200, Paul Slootman said:
On Mon 13 Jul 2015, Andrew Gideon wrote:
On the other hand, I do confess that I am sometimes
Ken Chase rsync-list-m...@sizone.org wrote:
And what's performance like? I've heard lots of COW systems performance
drops through the floor when there's many snapshots.
For BTRFS I'd suspect the performance penalty to be fairly small. Snapshots can
be done in different ways, and the way BTRFS
Wayne Davison wayned at samba.org writes:
The best place to add that include and the gettext define would be to put
them in rsync.h somewhere, which would make the localisation idiom available
in all the .c files. Putting it down at the bottom of the file would be a
reasonable spot for it.
Hi
Hi All,
What does the value for File list size represent? Is it the number of
files or the number of bytes?
For one of my tests the following output was produced.
Number of regular files transferred: 1
File list size: 0
Is there supposed to be any direct correlation between these 2 statistics?
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:16 PM Selva Nair selva.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I had named a module as global and it appears not to be recognized.
[...] Any pointers as to what names are allowed for modules will be
appreciated.
