If you are doing a local<-> local transfer, you are wasting time
with checksums. You'll get faster performance with "--whole-file".
Why do you stop it at night when you could 'unlimit' the transfer speed?
Seems like when you aren't there would be best time to copy everything.
Doing checksums
On 10/11/2018 10:51 AM, just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via
rsync wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5124
--- Comment #7 from Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca ---
I also vote for this feature. Using multiple connections, rsync can use
multiples internet connections at the
On 9/18/2018 7:44 AM, Frank Steiner via rsync wrote:
Hi,
the man page states
For systems that support extended-attribute namespaces, a copy being
done by a super-user copies all namespaces except system.*.
That's the reason why NFAv4 ACLs are not copied as they are in the
On 8/19/2018 10:11 PM, just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via
rsync wrote:
The following test script shows that attempting to exclude the file
/sourcedir/a/file2 by using //sourcedir//a//file2 in the excluded files
list, will silently not exclude it because of all those adjacent
On 8/22/2018 2:09 PM, Shaya Potter via rsync wrote:
If one is rsyncing a machine without selinux (therefore no
security.selinux xattr on each file), to a system that has selinux (even
in permissive mode), rsync doesn't play nice.
basically selinux seems to make it appear that every file
