not pretty, but I've had something like this working for years. I'd
have to pull it apart to get more specific. I actually pieced it
together from info found with google.
Good luck,
Bill Uhl
GreenLight Networks, LLC
Max Kipness wrote:
Hello,
I've already tried asking at the cwrRsync forums
the
workstation build disposable, in case stupid user tricks make a rebuild
necessary. With a change in the registry, the user's default 'Documents
and Settings' subtree can be directed to a network share on your server.
Just a thought...
Bill Uhl
GreenLight Networks, LLC
--
To unsubscribe
and the latest stable rsync, not the last release. The
patches are already folded into the latest stable available for
download, I'm pretty sure.
Good Luck
Bill Uhl
GreenLight Networks, LLC
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
Back in rsync 2.6.2 and before, I used a chmod and ldap patch by Stefan
Nehlsen. The chmod part worked well for me then. As rsync moved on, the
patch no longer worked and my c skills were too limited to figure out
how to update it. I am wondering about two things.
First. Is the current chmod
That seems to work as expected.
Thanks,
Bill Uhl
Matt McCutchen wrote:
Attached is my patch. I rewrote dest_mode and fixed the bug in the
process. I also added a test to chmod-option.test and updated
acls.diff to correctly patch my new dest_mode.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options
Running rsync 2.6.8 as daemon on Fedora core 4. Have the following in
the rsyncd.conf file...
[test]
path = /home/test/greenlight
# use chroot = true
max connections = 3
lock file = /var/lock/rsyncd/test.lock
uid = 503
gid = 503
auth users = test
on a
software raid mirror.
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 22 Sep 2006, Bill Uhl wrote:
incoming chmod = Dg=s,Dug=rwx,Do-rwx,Fug=rw,Fo-rwx
Following the example in the manpage, I would have used:
incoming chmod = Dg=s,ug=rwx,o-rwx,Fug=rw,Fo-rwx
i.e. leaving out
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 22 Sep 2006, Bill Uhl wrote:
Tried leaving out the repeated D and F per the manpage. Permissions
without the leading D and F were applied to both directories and files.
I am not sure how this would work. Would this make the chmod settings
order
