On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:04:09PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
I haven't had a chance to test this recently, but Dave just reminded
me that it ought to merge soon and I agree.
I was thinking about this the other day in the context of the
Bitkeeper bk url manpage (if Colin will forgive me :-).
Dave Dykstra wrote
concerning Re: 4.4BSD chflags support for rsync something like this:
New options are usually handled by just letting the remote side fail when
it doesn't understand the option, as you're doing. Perhaps you just
shouldn't include it with -a.
Ok, changed that. I also
the files will be owned by that user id.
So far, Linux to Linux rsync has no problem at all. The Windows clients
(NT and Win2000) are using cygwin1.dll v1.3.10 and rsync 1.5.4.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman
out by now, but I didn't see any responses
to your question. The answer is: you need to specify the recursive
option. The -a option you used in the first command implies it, but you
left it out of the second command.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org
is specified after the --backup-dir option).
That sounds like a fine idea to me.
Perhaps different environments need different solutions, hence I
propose to implement both features.
Highly interested in your comments.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman
Does anybody know if this might cause problems on non-Windows machines?
Would shutdown need to be checked in configure, or is it implemented on
all Unix variants? I don't recall ever seeing a need for it on Unix.
- Dave
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:39:57AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
The problem
implementation wasn't returning the proper error code.
I haven't seen anbody else report problems with rsync producing files of
nulls, but it's pretty disconcerting.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:28:06PM -0700, Eric Whiting wrote:
I'm syncing from a linux box (NAS disk) to a sun
,
Jennifer
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:56:47 -0600
From: Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jennifer Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: map_ptr warning
Mail-Followup-To: Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jennifer Lu
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime
, jeremy bornstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Dykstra wrote:
Wouldn't encrypting the file with gpg change the timestamp as well as the
size, so rsync would still copy the file?
It certainly does--which is why I reset it afterwards.
Although the backup script I use is pretty simple
to duplicate it.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:28:05AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 07:54:01AM -0800, Victor Grey wrote:
Using a fresh copy of rsync 2.5.4 installed from the ports collection on
FreeBSD 4.5 Release:
Works fine unless I try to copy a large file with -avz, then I get
I expect the problem is that you're using '*' in your script which expands
to all the directory names. Try using '.' instead.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:09:55PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
I just built this new version last week and am trying to rsync a running
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:19:26PM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
On 19 Mar 2002, Paul Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I filed this as bug 4150 http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/
Jitterbug, good, but I don't think anybody is really maintaining
it at the moment. (For example, there are 733
algorithm under some circumstances and that has not yet
been fixed in a released version.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:29:11AM -0800, Jennifer Lu wrote:
Hi,
I compiled 2.5.3 rsync and used rsync between Solaris5.5.1 to Solaris5.8
without any error last week, then, we ran
for special one-time operations
to get two directories in sync that hadn't previously been maintained by
rsync.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:58:23AM -0800, Jennifer Lu wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the reply. Yes, both servers are running rsync2.5.3,
and you were correct, without -z and c
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:24:39PM -0600, Joe Rice wrote:
Dave Dykstra([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:17:46AM -0600:
Let me explain Wayne's answer a little further. The main thing you need to
understand is that the exclude algorithm is applied recursively so any time
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:42:21AM -0800, jeremy bornstein wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 11:24:07AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Oh, I see, you want to use your new --date-only option on the first pass
when you're determining which files to transfer, before you encrypt them.
Yes!
I
Wouldn't encrypting the file with gpg change the timestamp as well as the
size, so rsync would still copy the file?
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0800, jeremy bornstein wrote:
Martin,
The encryption program I'm using, gpg, includes a small bit of header
information
only require the server side to be patched.
- Dave Dykstra
--- options.c.O Tue Mar 19 13:37:18 2002
+++ options.c Tue Mar 19 14:05:50 2002
-22,7 +22,20
#include popt.h
int make_backups = 0;
-int whole_file = -1;
+
+/**
+ * Should we send the whole file as literal data rather than trying
No, --force is only relevant without --delete, as the rsync man page now
says.
I believe Brian's problem is that --delete doesn't make sense with --update.
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:42:23AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a similar problem with rsync, though it's
that
it considers; if you are running low on real memory and end up swapping,
that could slow you down considerably.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:45:51PM -0700, Kerry Cox wrote:
Okay, I've been lurking on this list for several weeks and have finally
gotten rsync to work well when transferring
of this. I first saw it in 2.5.3.
-Lee
I have not seen this, and I would appreciate a simple set of steps to
reproduce it. I touched that code recently so I guess I should fix it.
I tried
rsync -av 'host:`echo dir1/*`' dir2
and that didn't do it.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:21:44PM -0600, Lee Eakin wrote:
Dave, I found the test case, it simply involves more than one directory and
--delete:
rsync -av --delete remhost:'bin lib' .
With this command I get 3 done messages:
receiving file list ... done
done
done
wrote 16
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 11:32:11AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:41:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I like link-dest, and the - for exclude
To use the rsync --daemon, you need to use two colons after the server name.
The next problem you'll probably run into is that you'll need
read only = no in rsyncd.conf.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 06:26:12PM +1000, Rsync mail Account wrote:
I have so far been unable to get rsync
If we would add an option to do that functionality, I would vote for one
that was more general which could mask off any set of permission bits and
possibly add any set of bits. Perhaps a chmod-like syntax if it could be
implemented simply.
- Dave
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 10:28:43PM +1100, Scott
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I like link-dest, and the - for exclude-from/include-from was already
something I was planning to add one of these days along with the
--files-from option I still plan
New options are usually handled by just letting the remote side fail when
it doesn't understand the option, as you're doing. Perhaps you just
shouldn't include it with -a.
At a minimum, you'd need to update the rsync.yo and rsync.1 versions of
the man page before it could be accepted.
- Dave
.
- Dave Dykstra
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 06:30:45AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
I'm trying to get a report from rsync using the -n option which will
produce a report of files that are different in a ls -al kind of style so
one could analyze what's different before possibly clobering
to 192.168.1.205 to work.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Mike
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
That's a known problem, solved in the 2.5.3pre* versions in the preview
area of the rsync download site.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:03:02PM -0800, Matt Simonsen wrote:
OK - that's 3 individuals with Redhat 6.2 installs who have encountered this.
I'm pretty sure it's a real
area should work on all
SunOS 5.5.1 and later, yes.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:55:58PM -0800, Jennifer Lu wrote:
Hi,
We got the following error messages when we ran rsync 2.5.2
from Solaris-5.5.1 to Solaris-5.8.
vl121909/jagcdms_ch+_diags/sys/sys_l/ch_sys/rtl/systop.v
I like link-dest, and the - for exclude-from/include-from was already
something I was planning to add one of these days along with the
--files-from option I still plan to write, but --compare-perms confuses
me. Can you give examples of when you need it?
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002
this as a bug/local system problem?
Regards
Andrew McGregor
Dave Dykstra wrote:
I haven't seen that symptom, but there's a very serious bug in rsync 2.5.2
that could conceivably be causing that. I suggest using version 2.5.3pre1
from the preview directory in the rsync sources area
filesystem fills up.
At least this brought to light potential problems with running 2.5.2 and
pointing out an upgrade to 2.5.3pre1.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart
variable rsync_cv_HAVE_SOCKETPAIR=no before calling
configure.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
it seems like it should already be working the
way you want it.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
else's area, and that file gets restored from backup? I think a
better solution would be to ensure that only the root user has any access
to the backup area, probably by using a secrets file and a --password-file
that's readable only by root, or better yet use ssh and public/private key
pair.
- Dave
one and moves the new one into place.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:28:50PM -0500, Joseph Annino wrote:
This is cool. You can't really tell that this is what is going on from
reading the man page.
On 2/21/02 10:55 PM, Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002
the output of rsync or fsckor my rsync-settings, i can
post it.
thanks
I think it would be helpful to post those; if you have a lot of repitition,
though, trim it down just so we can get the idea.
- Dave Dykstra
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
and it takes the same 9 minutes and
eventually suceeds. It only dies because the other server process had died
and it gets a signal.
David.
- Dave Dykstra
Content-Description: client lsof
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPEDEVICE SIZE/OFFNODE NAME
...
rsync 20039 root4u IPv4
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:10:52PM -0500, David Birnbaum wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
[adding the mailing list to the Cc after David sent me trusses and other
info about his hang. I have trimmed down the tracing info to the relevant
pieces.]
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002
problems, I haven't tried them yet.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Bob O'Connor wrote:
When I compile on Solaris * I get the foillowing errors:
bash-2.03# gmake
gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -I./popt -c rsync.c -o rsync.o
gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
that automatically has already been enabled.
- Dave Dykstra
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
it have allowed the system to free up?
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 03:22:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
rsync was running against filesystems /disk5 and /disk7 to back them onto
remote server (172.16.101.4) using the following script:
if [ `ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep ::d5
ideas where this comes from and how to make it go away? I am using
rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 8 to pull data from rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 7.
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a known problem with 2.5.2. Use 2.5.3pre1 which should become
2.5.3 real soon.
- Dave Dykstra
to their own file.
That's the way it is, but I think it's a bug. I went ahead and checked in
a fix to the rsync CVS:
http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/clientserver.c.diff?r1=1.84r2=1.85
- Dave Dykstra
that you submit a patch.
- Dave Dykstra
is Warning:unexpected read size of 0
i map_ptr.
Any suggestions of what could be done to rectify this?
The problem is in 2.5.2. Apply the patch at
http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/match.c.diff?r1=1.47r2=1.48
- Dave Dykstra
Aack! The same errors are happening on my 4.1.4 systems and I didn't
notice. It's working in some circumstances and failing in others. I will
look for a fix and post later.
Thanks for the report.
- Dave
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:08:57PM +0100, Joe Manning wrote:
Hi,
I have just
by direct email
when I have it built.
- Dave
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:28:38AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Aack! The same errors are happening on my 4.1.4 systems and I didn't
notice. It's working in some circumstances and failing in others. I will
look for a fix and post later.
Thanks
needed and clientname.c uses it properly so I went ahead and checked
this into CVS.
- Dave Dykstra
it
bothers wake up, but it goes to select again.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:40:30AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is where it sets a sort of 60 second timeout if you don't set a
timeout at all. As far as what it affects, I'm not that good with the
code. I just know
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:00:10PM +0100, R?nnblom Jan?ke /Teknous wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skriver:
Ah, I see you posted more details for the same problem. That message comes
when one process on the receiver side interrupts the other because it is is
about to die, and doesn't really say
that is not being sent, that points
to a TCP problem.
- Dave Dykstra
...
13203:write(9, ( c o m p a t i b l e ;.., 1024)= 1024
13203:write(9, .., 1024)= 1024
13203:write(9, n d o w s 9 8 ; D i.., 448) = 448
13203:poll(0xFFBECF20
error (code 1) at main.c(824)
The last line worrys me. Should i stick with the 2.4.6 from redhat?
2.5.2 has a serious bug, but that's not the symptom. What's the full
command you are you trying to give it?
- Dave Dykstra
You could be running out of memory; rsync uses a small amount of memory
for every file it deals with during a single run. Can you break it up
into smaller runs? Often people do each top-level directory separately
to avoid this problem.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:11:23PM +0100
server mode
was never really intended for significant writing, more for reading, and it
has some quirks when used for writing (not to say that dying completely is
just a quirk).
Again, it's possible you're running out of memory with that many files.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:21:25PM +0100, Rönnblom Janåke /Teknous wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skriver:
You could be running out of memory; rsync uses a small amount of memory
for every file it deals with during a single run. Can you break it up
into smaller runs? Often people do each
I'm stuck with the 32 bit limit.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:31:55AM -0500, Granzow, Doug (NCI) wrote:
I just ran this again and got this error:
leelab/NCBI_Data_old/GenBank/htg
write failed on leelab/NCBI_Data_old/GenBank/htg : Error 0
rsync error: error in file IO (code 11
seeing
that message, I not so sure? - I have no issues with 2.4.6.
2.5.2 does have a serious bug, I suggest you wait for 2.5.3.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:29:49PM -0700, Eric Whiting wrote:
Dave,
I tried the snapshot... I get an error (after a ./configure;make).
gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c main.c -o main.o
main.c: In function `do_cmd':
main.c:184: `RSYNC_RSH' undeclared (first use in this
to 60
seconds is still happening, or if that was only something earlier. Of
course, it's also entirely possible that the SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error
message is being caused by a different problem.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:22:23AM -0500, David Birnbaum wrote:
I'm running 2.5.2. However
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:56:38PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Of the proposed alternatives, I like this latter the best, changing
--non-blocking-io to --no-blocking-io.
Cool. I like that one as well. Here's an implementation. This patch
adds
lead to fewer surprises than if some unknowledgable user put
something into an RSYNC_OPTS variable and broke somebody else's script. I
vote against RSYNC_OPTS.
- Dave Dykstra
of the protocol properly. The client error message should definitely
be more descriptive.
Is there anything more descriptive in /var/log/rsyncd.log on the server?
The real problem is probably on the server.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:52:52AM -0500, MICHAEL R. LEFEBVRE wrote:
I'm
been integrated.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:45:52PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Hi,
I am running rsync 2.5.2 and have a server running rsync --daemon over ssh.
Now, I read plenty of information on rsync, all the man all the info on
the rsync.samba.org + many other sites
Sorry, but that advice is wrong. Daniel's using the single colon so his
rsyncd.conf is being ignored. Ross needs JD Paul's patch which hasn't bee
integrated yet:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-December/005488.html
- Dave
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:58:55PM -0500, Daniel
the : syntax.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:14:23PM -0600, Jack McKinney wrote:
...
If I add 512 bytes at the begining of the file, then I would expect
it. If I only add 14 bytes, then I don't think rsync will detect this,
as it would require it to compute checksums start at EVERY byte instead
of 512
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:55:29AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
Here's the latest version of the batch mode cleanup patch.
Because I've been testing with Jos on that patch I went ahead and submitted
it to CVS.
- Dave
Probably Mike needs to use read only = false in his rsyncd.conf.
The default is read only = true.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:16:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Mike. I'd guess it's a permission problem. Either on the
destination itself or teh module defined
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:57:29PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Dave Dykstra wrote:
JD Paul's patch which I previously referred to will give you what
you want.
So, this patch would apply only when the :: is in use correct? That's what I
understand.
Yes.
: syntax uses rsh (or ssh
/
or
ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/unpacked/rsync/
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:33:43AM -0700, Eric Whiting wrote:
Make that 2 of us who need to specify a large timeout.
I have found that I have to set the timeout to a large value (1) to
get the rsyncs to run successfully. Leaving
wrote:
According to Dave Dykstra:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:09:18AM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
According to sba:
No I did not apply the patch, but I verified the same problem with
rsync-2.4.8, is that sufficient?
No, because rsync-2.4.8 include the same security patch
transfering data in both directions?
No there isn't. What's wrong with doing it in two commands?
You may be interested in
http://mailsync.sourceforge.net
which is explicitly designed to sync mailboxes.
- Dave Dykstra
in a run, so if you can split it up into smaller transfers that can
help a lot. Watch the available RAM swap space on the server side during
a transfer.
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:15:36AM +0100, David Bordas wrote:
Other things :
client disk not full :
/dev/hdb2
you
applied the following patch that I posted on Tuesday? Rsync 2.5.2 is badly
broken without it.
- Dave Dykstra
--- match.c.O Tue Jan 29 15:31:37 2002
+++ match.c Tue Jan 29 15:31:54 2002
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@
match. The 3 reads are caused by the
running
rsync).
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:01:07AM -0500, MICHAEL R. LEFEBVRE wrote:
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (88 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at
io.c(139)
I'm getting the above error when trying to use rsync over port 873
be easy to use rsync's compression library to
compress the whole flist, csum, and delta files on the fly. That would
certainly be more convenient.
+.IP o
+The -n/--dryrun option does not work in batch mode and yields a runtime
+error\.
- Dave Dykstra
is not the one that rsync is triggering:
- fix an inflate input buffer bug that shows up on rare but persistent
occasions (Mark)
I wonder if it's worth upgrading if nobody has experienced the problem in
rsync.
- Dave Dykstra
by default is adding
the gcc option -Wall. I think Martin intends to fix most of them but
hasn't gotten around to it yet.
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:23:33AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
Thanks Dave for your comments, I have incorporated your feedback in the patch
below. Please review.
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:49:07AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Hmm, I wonder if it would be easy to use rsync's compression
in rsync. Make sure
you can access the files from a shell prompt.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:03:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dave Dykstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
I stumbled across the bug report
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58878
which shows that you made a bug fix to rsync on Sunday. What exactly did
you do
list
does that exclude everything under that directory or only the first set
of directories underneath it?
That has the effect of excluding everything because the algorithm is
recursive; when it reaches the exclude on a/, it never descends down
into that directory.
- Dave Dykstra
the files are removed from the sending side there's nothing left to
sync later.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Wayne Davison wrote:
I'd like to revisit the topic of moving files from system to system
using rsync.
I'm sad
read the rsync.1 man page section EXCLUDE PATTERNS carefully.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:11:13PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:05:38AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I'm the one who put in that wording because I think I didn't completely
understand what it did at the time. I just changed the wording to
This option
I'm sorry, but I don't have any familiarity with that part of rsync code
and don't have any ideas for you.
It isn't clear to me that the -z option makes sense for batch mode anyway.
Perhaps turning the rsync_* files into a gzipped tarball before sending
them to the remote machines would have
by this.
I noticed there's no corresponding message when connecting to an rsync
server daemon as he had suggested. I think it should be consistent.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:02:49AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Subject: Re: SSH
Sounds pretty useful. I think perhaps it would be better
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:52:17AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:07:04AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
It isn't clear to me that the -z option makes sense for batch mode anyway.
Perhaps turning the rsync_* files into a gzipped tarball before sending
them to the remote
The upd message looks like a file which you don't have permission to
read.
Other than that, I don't know what to tell you. I don't have Free BSD so
I can't reproduce the problem. You're going to have to debug it further
yourself, or wait to see if somebody else has the problem.
- Dave Dykstra
argument
parsing was converted to using popt. All options that are directly
processed by poptGetContext because the argPtr (4th entry in the table)
is non-zero are not calling check_refuse_options().
I'm not very familiar with popt so I don't know how to fix it. Do you,
Martin?
- Dave Dykstra
serious enough to warrant an immediate new
release.
- Dave Dykstra
--- match.c.O Tue Jan 29 15:31:37 2002
+++ match.c Tue Jan 29 15:31:54 2002
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@
match. The 3 reads are caused by the
running match, the checksum update
)
What were you trying to do, and between what rsync versions and operating
systems? That message comes from attempting to read a 64 bit number on
a system that doesn't support 64 bits.
- Dave Dykstra
6.2, and Unixware 1.1.2.
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:00:24PM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
Date: Fri Jan 25 15:00:21 2002
Author: mbp
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory va:/tmp/cvs-serv24773
Modified Files:
rsync.h
Log Message:
DEV64_t and INO64_T should
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:05:38AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I'm the one who put in that wording because I think I didn't completely
understand what it did at the time. I just changed the wording to
This option tells rsync to delete directories when
non
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:31:44PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Thankyou dann for the patch, and Colin for reminding me. Well done.
This is in CVS and will be in 2.5.2.
--
Martin
Here's the patch that was in the bug report:
diff -urN rsync-2.5.1.orig/flist.c rsync-2.5.1/flist.c
---
rsync -av --delete --exclude-from=exclude-file --backup d/x/ h/x/
Rsync changed nothing under h except for the timestamps of the directories.
Can you demonstrate the problem with a reproducible example? What version
of rsync? What operating system?
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:17
201 - 300 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
