On 4/17/07, Frederik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rsync -azR --delete -e ssh --exclude-from=./exclude.lst
--link-dest=/tmp/backup/nelly-2007-04-17-12-34-26 /tmp/test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/backup/backup-nelly-2007-04-17-12-34-33/
OK, obvious typo in the above command :-)
It works c
doing wrong, or is this simply not supported?
--
Frederik
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:48:38PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 05:54:28PM -0800, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > It breaks some functionality of the
> > --include and --exclude options:
>
> True. You can work around that problem if you always use an
/ then it will only match a direc-
tory, not a file, link, or device.
but I doubt I'll ever use that.
However, you haven't given your reasons for not wanting to include the
proposed option. I'm curious.
Frederik
--
http://ofb.net/~frederik/
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:46:57PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:33:27AM -0800, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > what would be nicer is an option to turn off the special
> > interepretation of terminal slashes in source paths.
>
> That would be easy en
be hard to code? Then I'd make an alias with this option, and
when I wanted to recover the functionality I'd just write:
3. rsync a/. h:
I think #3 does the same thing as #1, is this correct? Let me know if
this is a reasonable suggestion.
Thanks,
Frederik
--
http://ofb.net/~frederik/
-
