Re: rsync 2.6.0 - suspected memory leak bug

2004-01-21 Thread Kelly Garrett
Wayne Davison wayned at samba.org writes: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:16:34PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: As far as i can tell Under inetd each connection should get independant rsync process(es) which all exit so there would be no rsync processes running unless there is an active

Re: rsync 2.6.0 - suspected memory leak bug

2004-01-21 Thread Kelly Garrett
Jim Salter jim at jrssystems.net writes: IANALG (I Am Not A Linux Guy - FreeBSD is my *nix of choice), but could this possibly be related to the mem:remap Linux kernel bug that was recently discovered? Jim Salter It just might have something to do with this. I have come to the

Re: rsync 2.6.0 - suspected memory leak bug

2004-01-21 Thread Kelly Garrett
Jim Salter jim at jrssystems.net writes: What kernel are you using, and if it's not at least 2.4.x, have you considered simply trying a newer kernel? Jim Salter jim at jrssystems.net writes: IANALG (I Am Not A Linux Guy - FreeBSD is my *nix of choice), but could this possibly

rsync 2.6.0 BIG memory leak

2004-01-20 Thread Kelly Garrett
Greetings all, I have downloaded and built rsync 2.6.0 on our HP ProLiant DL380-G3 servers (2 Hyperthread processors, 4 GB RAM, 840 GB Hard Disk, etc. etc.) running Red Hat 8 with the latest errata kernel (2.4.20-28smp) and updates from HP for RH8. rsync is run in daemon mode from xinetd.