What should be the official behaviour here?
I must admit some of my scripts probably have both
trailing and non-trailing /. But just played around
until it was mirroring into the correct directory.
Lachlan.
At 18:20 07/11/02 -0500, you wrote:
It appears that the trailing slash in the source
I think this day light savings time stamp issue also affects
Win98 as well - at least on a Win98 PC I use.
Rsync insists on updating all the files fully.
Shouldn't it just be resetting the times on the files
if the files are the same size - or am I missing
something here?
Lachlan.
Your
Yo,
Just a word of the bleeding obvious on the following problem I reported
previously:
(if someone else did reply - it got lost in the few 100 spam Emails I
get a day)
In the /etc/rsync.conf - under the relevant module area - it was a
matter of setting the uid and gid to root.
uid = root
Hi,
Is there a network interface listen command for rsync
so that for a system with multiple network cards and
multiple IP addresses - rsync will only be visible
on a defined interface and defined IPs?
Like in samba?:
e.g.,
bind interfaces only = True
interfaces = eth0 193.xy.zz.aa
I'm thinking of how to backup an entire server (server A) to a
remote area (server B) using rsync.
My initial thought was to have a shell account on server B, then have a
cronjob running as root on server A that uses rsync to send all the files
over to the shell account on server B.
Then I
trying to setup a rsycd server
[root@gimli adm]# cat /etc/rsyncd.conf
#uid = cvs
#gid = cvs
log file = /var/adm/rsync.log
use chroot = no
max connections = 4
syslog facility = daemon
pid file = /var/run/rsyncd.pid
[website]
path = /bravenet1/home/cvs/website
comment = whole website area
What versions of rsync are you using (latest?). What systems and
what compiler did you use?
Lachlan.
n/m figured it out apparently i need 2 ::
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote:
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 18:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Might there be a good set of tutorials on the web on
how to do this while minimizing the risk of exposing
systems as a consequence? (setup of private/public
identity files that minimize the risk of hackers getting
passwordless access to other remote machines).
I must admit hating the
As for implementing ssh inside of rsync, I'd like to continue to reiterate
what a bad idea I think that is. Security is enough pain without worrying
about every program carrying its own security model and implementation (and
possible exploits).
What if such a feature was an optional module that
Not fully understanding the ramifications of chroot (as a Linux newbie)
I don't really know whether limiting someone's access by chrooting is
any more effective than limiting his access based on privileges provided
to his account.
Re: rsync, ssh, security and keeping hackers out. (just my 2
Hi,
Not sure if this was answered in the recent flurry of postings but
what is the status on putting a cut-down version of ssh inside
rsync to allow an "easy" encryption option?
Lachlan.
Lachlan M. D. Cranswick
Geochemistry - Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University
PO Box 1000,
11 matches
Mail list logo
