On 23 Mar 2002, Kim Jongtae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I see the rsync source and rsync makes hashing table and search hashing
table tag_table to find the index of array struct sum_buf , which is a
element of struct sum_struct.
According to the source code, variable last_i is
On 21 Mar 2002, Berend Tober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uid = nobody
gid = nobody
use chroot = yes
read only=yes
max connections = 2
log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log
hosts allow = 192.168.123.3
hosts deny = *.*.*.*
[home]
On 21 Mar 2002, jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please CC me. I'm not subscribed.
Attached is a patch against 2.5.4pre1 CVS current to add the
--link-dest option so rsync will create hardlinks for
unchanged regular files to a directory on the destination.
This is like --compare-dest
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0800, jeremy bornstein wrote:
The encryption program I'm using, gpg, includes a small bit of header
information with the encrypted file, thus changing the size. Gpg is a
public key encryption program which at least includes the numeric key
ID of
On 11 Mar 2002, Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is on Red Hat 7.1. or 7.2. Looks like I'll have to wait a while on this
update. Thanks anyway.
You should not need to run autoconf unless you edit configure.in,
because we ship ./configure and config.h.in.
--
Martin
--
To
On 20 Mar 2002, jeremy bornstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Dykstra wrote:
Wouldn't encrypting the file with gpg change the timestamp as well as the
size, so rsync would still copy the file?
It certainly does--which is why I reset it afterwards.
Although the backup script I use is
On 19 Mar 2002, Paul Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I filed this as bug 4150 http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/
Jitterbug, good, but I don't think anybody is really maintaining
it at the moment. (For example, there are 733 messages in incoming.)
I wonder if it would be better to just
On 19 Mar 2002, Zoong Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
On my Alpha box running Tru64 5.1, rsync-2.5.4 compiled by GNU gcc
3.0.1 anh GNU make 3.79.1 has this size: 4562848.
The same version of rsync compiled by Compaq C compiler V6.3-028 and
Compaq make has this size: 655424.
It is
On 15 Mar 2002, Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have already sent this once, but since the problem persists here
it is again.
Thanks.
Your patch was merged, but after the 2.5.4 release. Is CVS head OK?
(look at cvs.samba.org)
An other part of the patch adds DESTDIR
--
Martin
---BeginMessage---
While testing a frontend to rsync, we have been bitten by rsync eating
all the memory of the host. We have found that it was due to rsync
trying to write an error and then failing to write the error and
trying to report that it fails to write the error and so on.
This does not demonstrate that test(1) is broken.
I should have left off the '(1)'.
Apparently different systems support different options. I suppose the
best portable test for symlinks will be
if test -L $f || test -h $f || /bin/test -L $f || /bin/test -h $f
then
echo is a link
fi
On 14 Mar 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not seen this, and I would appreciate a simple set of steps to
reproduce it. I touched that code recently so I guess I should fix it.
I tried
rsync -av 'host:`echo dir1/*`' dir2
and that didn't do it.
Since we seem to have
On 14 Mar 2002, Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
timeconfig-3.2.5-1.i386.rpm
158253 100% 160.48kB/s0:00:00
timidity++-2.10.4-2.i386.rpm
9309389 100% 397.71kB/s0:00:22
tix-8.2.0b1-67.i386.rpm
456809 100% 437.78kB/s
On 14 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure you get a million and one requests for changes to rsync. I thought
I would put my bid in and sugest that a feature to perform a unix style
diff of files that are found to be different would be useful for
administrators that use rsync to
On 14 Mar 2002, Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
rsync-2.5.4
I'm getting these errors:
Thanks for sending the log. That really helps.
Are you perhaps running 'make test' as root? That would probably
explain the failure of daemon-gzip-download and daemon-gzip-upload,
which have
People might find this entertaining and/or useful:
http://www.gnu.org/manual/autoconf-2.52/html_chapter/autoconf_10.html
With the help of Jos Backus I just discovered the answer to
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync-cvs/2002-January/001271.html
is that Sun's test(1) is breathtakingly
On 12 Mar 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we would add an option to do that functionality, I would vote for one
that was more general which could mask off any set of permission bits and
possibly add any set of bits. Perhaps a chmod-like syntax if it could be
implemented
On 12 Mar 2002, Rusty Carruth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get the following error running rsync 2.5.2 on AIX 4.3 in combination
with SSH Secure Shell 2.3.0.
rsync -e ssh myuserid@localhost:/tmp
myuserid's password:
/bin/ksh: rsync: not found.
unexpected
On 12 Mar 2002, C.Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The command I am using is:
rsync -avx --hard-links --links --ignore-errors --perms --devices
and the permissions on the source are not appearing on the destination
and the destination ssh-account has no root-rights.
Perhaps you mean
On 13 Mar 2002, Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply Greg.
As you suggested, I have typed in:
rsync /tmp/sheepb.jpg RH72TB::testmodule/
and it just does a CR-LF with no errors, but the file is not on the server
hard drive. I wonder where it has gone? :-))
Now try
rsync
It seems the patch we merged into rsync 2.5.3 is not correct and -z is
not reliable. I'll do another release shortly.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On 11 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having serious problems with the current 2.5.3 release under
Debian testing and the 2.4.19-pre2 Linux kernel.
As you can see from the appended build log, I get many compiler
warnings. More seriously, when I install and try to use the
resulting
On 5 Feb 2002, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:30:51PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
rsync includes a slightly modified and incompatible version of zlib.
(PhD-project over-optimization...) To update to a newer zlib would
require merging those changes across
On 6 Mar 2002, Kim Scarborough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using it to backup files from one computer to another, and it
works exactly as I thought it would, except that it seems to be
copying entire files over when they've change rather than the
differences.
What specifically leads you
link_stat upeg_web/ : No such file or directory
client: nothing to do: perhaps you need to specify some filenames or the
rsync error: partial transfer (code 23) at mainc(23)
I think you're hitting a bug in 252 Would you mind please trying
253pre1 and letting us know if that fixes the crash?
On 27 Feb 2002, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble getting rsync to output the log into common log format.
My web statistics program Webalizer (www.webalizer.org) wants the logs in
Common Log Format (httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html).
That sounds like a cool
On 27 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get those warnings but not those undefined symbols. They're coming from
lib/getnameinfo.c when INET6 is defined, and I use --disable-ipv6 on all
the platforms I compile on so I didn't notice it. You could try using
that. Other than
On 26 Feb 2002, Lancashire, Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that
./configure --with-included-popt
It should have detected that automatically. Can you please look in
config.log for some indication of why it did not?
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
On 22 Feb 2002, Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following module defined in rsyncd.conf:
[updates]
list = no
hosts allow = foo
path = /ext/updates
exclude = incoming
From host foo, if I run:
$ rsync -arHvn --delete bar::foo /ext/updates
then the
On 21 Feb 2002, David Bolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure Cygwin itself has a 2GB (32-bit) limitation for files.
Large file (64-bit) support for Cygwin has come up in various ways
repeatedly on the Cygwin mailing list but it generally ends up at the point
where if someone is
On 21 Feb 2002, Oliver Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after some searching i didn't came up with an answer so please excuse if this
is a total newbie question.
My problem:
I have server A which has a big (500G) database like file. On server B i
want to have a copy of this file
I just tried running Splint across rsync. (Splint is the C-checking
lint tool previously called LCLint.)
In default mode it gives 2552 (!!) warnings for rsync alone, not
including zlib or popt. In -weak mode, it gives 390. Of course, the
vast majority will not be real errors, but from past
(1) --no-detach
OK, already fixed. --no-fork would be good to add in the future -- it
can be handy for debugging.
(2) ctrl-c
Fixed recently by Colin Walters.
O_TEXT and O_BINARY
Good.
It might be cleaner to #ifdef on O_BINARY or something that will also
work on MSVC++.
+#ifdef
rsync rsync.h alta::ro
rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(151)
Connection reset by peer often means the remote rsync crashed.
If you see this message when the only problem is that the remote
module is read only,
On 19 Feb 2002, Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:23:04PM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
Available now from samba.org and all mirrors. Please report bugs,
compilation problems, etc. If there are no major issues I think I
will put this out as 2.5.3 shortly
Apparently the getaddrinfo stuff breaks something on RH5.2. I guess
that is not a common platform anymore, but there's a machine here that
people care about. I'll try and patch it.
--
Martin
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting,
On 20 Feb 2002, Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently the getaddrinfo stuff breaks something on RH5.2. I guess
that is not a common platform anymore, but there's a machine here that
people care about. I'll try and patch it.
Apparently this is a known bug. If you have
On 12 Feb 2002, C. Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
the --perms --owner --group --devices options do not work.
What is wrong ? Does anyone have an answer ?
$RSYNC -a --copy-links --ignore-errors --stats --progress --recursive
${RSYNCSERVER1}::${USER}/
In what way do they not
Why the sleep() call?
On 16 Feb 2002, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: socket.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/socket.c,v
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -u -r1.74 socket.c
+++ socket.c 16 Feb 2002 23:08:47 -
On 18 Feb 2002, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
Why the sleep() call?
I guess the point is that the fork() probably failed because the
server is overloaded, and therefore there is no point trying to accept
another connection again immediately. I
Here's an interesting discussion of somebody's experience using
BitKeeper on a free-as-in-speech project
http://www.mit.edu/afs/athena/user/x/i/xiphmont/Public/critique.html
--
Martin
On 7 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see a lot of messages have RSYNC_NAME : put on the beginning, including
FINFO messages. I really don't think they belong on FINFO messages at
all. I looked into it because I noticed it printing a symlink prefaced by
rsync: which
On 5 Feb 2002, Jack McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Brother tells me that Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:58:04AM -0600, Jack McKinney wrote:
If I change the status on the first message in the box (reply to it, delete
it), then the ENTIRE mailbox is re-copied. Not
On 4 Feb 2002, Jack McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I read my email on my laptop, and it is sometimes necessary to
login to a central server to read my email (firewall issues). What I do is
to peridocally sync with the central server (which we'll call server) by:
rsync -e ssh
On 6 Feb 2002, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. I like that one as well. Here's an implementation. This patch
adds the configure option --with(out)-blocking-io and defines a new
variable that gets put into config.h: DEFAULT_BLOCKING_IO.
OK, that's good. Thanks.
The code
On 6 Feb 2002, Jack McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#!/bin/sh
eval `ssh-agent`
ssh-add
rsync foo bar
rsync qux zump
..
kill $SSH_AGENT_PID
As I indicated, I do not want to use ssh-agent.
For religious reasons?
--
Martin
On 29 Jan 2002, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch (apologies for the size) updates zlib/* to the files that ship with
zlib 1.1.3.
rsync includes a slightly modified and incompatible version of zlib.
(PhD-project over-optimization...) To update to a newer zlib would
require
On 30 Jan 2002, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back I argued for adding a --with-rsh=CMD option to configure
and got some general agreement that it would be a good thing (especially
for systems that don't have rsh at all). However, the changes were
never integrated into
On 23 Jan 2002, Jamie Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...It all appears to work, but I'm not satisfied - dates dont seem
to change on files?
What do you mean?
Also, what version and platform is this?
--
Martin
This option will be in the rsync distribution from 2.5.2 onwards.
Thankyou,
--
Martin
On 25 Jan 2002, Martin A. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody here shed any light for me on whether or not the --server
option is here to stay?
Yes it is.
I guess it would be OK to have a manual section that says they're for
internal use only.
--
Martin
On 25 Jan 2002, Kenneth Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I have several Linux machines running the Debian unstable distribution.
Until recently I used rsync version 2.4.6 without any problems, but after
upgrading to version 2.5.1 (using apt-get) rsync fails.
The command that produces
I filter using the List-Id field for all email and it works well --
email specifically to me ends up in my main mailbox, because it might
be urgent.
Even if your mail client isn't that smart, you in most programs that
have any kind of filtering it would be possible to do something like
TO
On 24 Jan 2002, Nitin Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Mr. Martin,
I am dead sure that none of the process was running which was creating files on
that file system. Further, our process are not creating any files having last
extension as 0003. Kindly provide us with the solution of the
These all look fine, but somewhere along the line they got mangled so
that they won't apply properly. Would you mind please sending them to
me as an attachment or something? (Yes, I'm lazy ;-)
--
Martin
Good catch.
Tridge suggested the other day that it's bad to make -W the default
for local transfers, because it makes behaviour kind of less
reproducible: people who test rsync locally will see possibly
different bugs when running it over the network. I'm inclined to
agree, but I'm not sure.
On 14 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked Martin to explain how to do this on the rsync web page or better yet
put a prompt for it there but he hasn't said he would or not.
Right, we should do that.
Pipermail is not ideal. I particularly hate the way it splits up
threads
On 13 Jan 2002, Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As noted by Chris Boucher in bug 3750 one open missed the ifdef to add
binary to the win32 compile.
Fixed. The patch was backward, though: you should list the old
file first an the new file second when generating diffs.
Thanks,
--
Martin
This looks like too much pain to justify the switch at the moment.
I'm going to at least hold it over for a while. Sorry for any
inconvenience.
--
Martin
On 9 Jan 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dave,
It works now. Thanks a lot.
Is there any benchmark comparision of transfer rates between ftp, rcp or
rsync. Thanks again.
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync/tech_report/
rsync is most useful if there is already an older version of the file
on
On 7 Jan 2002, John E. Malmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the default warning level, some of the failures are silent, but can
cause incorrect code to be generated.
In particular, malloc() will be substituted for the built in alloca()
macro, unless Tru64 has the alloca.h header file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Linux, running 'rsync --daemon' as root bypasses some security
restrictions, allowing access to otherwise inaccessible files.
Well, I can see why you think this is confusing, but I think rsync's
behaviour is reasonable and consistent with Unix's security design.
I'm going to go ahead and move the source tree from CVS to BitKeeper.
Please don't make any commits to CVS until you hear from me. It's
fine to make checkouts.
--
Martin
If you only run released (rather than development) versions of rsync
then you can skip this message.
rsync's source tree has been converted from CVS to BitKeeper. This message
contains brief instructions for people who want to track development or
make contributions. I think it should take
On 6 Jan 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can use -a so far. Why options do not work?
# ./rsync --daemon
rsync: --daemon: unknown option
rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(793)
# rsync --help
Segmentation Fault - core dumped
Did you do make install or put rsync in
On 4 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I don't see anything in the send queues so that's not likely to be the
problem. It doesn't seem likely that anybody else would be able to easily
reproduce your setup. I suspect your Internet Sharing setup since you have
also
On 4 Jan 2002, Mike Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin,
Is there a binary for rsync for NCR MP-RAS ver 3.0 running on Intel PIII
Hardware?
I've never heard of that. What is it?
I can't seem to be able to compile the source codes either even though I have C
compiler
Here is what I
On 4 Jan 2002, Mike Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
./configure -host=i685-ncr-sysv4.3
configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't use --host.
If a cross compiler is detected then cross compile mode will be used.
configure: Configuring rsync 2.5.1
checking build system
On 22 Dec 2001, Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am on a developpers list for mandrake: cooker@ and the rsync-servers
broke which resulted in a lot of very unhappy people cause their rsync
directories got empied.
Sorry about that...
rsync should never delete local files just because the
On 20 Dec 2001, Mack, Daemian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is, why does it work? Are you indeed copying
between two NTFS
filesystems, with rsync running under Windows cygwin on
both sides? I
would have thought that would result in matching timestamps
granularity on
On 6 Dec 2001, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will also pound a little bit more on the rsync+ bits. Two more small nits:
rsync.1: -f, --read-batch=FILE read batch file
rsync.yo: -f, --read-batch=FILE read batch file
Here, FILE should be EXT, as it specifies the
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:33:56 -0600
Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it bother anybody else that -v prints directories twice? It
first prints all affected directories and files in recursive order and
then prints new directories again. I can't recall noticing that rsync
always did
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:30:54 -0600
Tim Shubitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
I've recently become an rsync user and have installed it on a
LinuxPPC box to sync up to another machine. So I set things up and went
to try and start rsync on the Linux box the software does nothing except
On 4 Dec 2001, JD Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a new version of my rsync-server-over-remote-shell patch:
This looks good. My main reservation is that it makes it even harder
to explain how rsync works, but I think the increase in flexibility
justifies it.
I'd like to get some of
On 17 Dec 2001, Kapoor, Nishikant X [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse me for my ignorance but is this flag referring to the files with
same filename on source and destination ? If the destination file has
the same size as that of one on source but a different name, would it
still skip it ?
At
On 17 Dec 2001, Ed Santiago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rsync 2.5.0 still has a bug where it hangs under some circumstances.
The hang is beyond my abilities to track down.
The other thing you absolutely need to send is the output of
netstat -ta
while the program is running. If netstat on
Mailman has been upgraded; please ignore this message.
--
Martin
On 14 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody else getting sick of our list getting spammed?
There is a spam filter in place, but it's not perfect.
Foreign language spam is even more arrogant than English -- what
fraction of internet morons want to buy toner cartridges in Polish?
--
On 14 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
open_socket_in was attempting to try all the protocols returned from
getaddrinfo(), but only if a corresponding call to socket() returned one of
three *NOSUPPORT errno codes. A Redhat 6.2 system was observed returning
EINVAL instead so it never went
On 14 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified Files:
options.c
Log Message:
When INET6 is not defined, meaning that IPv6 is not supported, need to
initalize the global_opts.af_hint to AF_INET or systems such as Linux that
have a native getaddrinfo() because they support IPv6
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An additional hard link to an existing file takes only directory
space, which, if it's not enough of an addition to that directories
existing data to cause the filesystem driver to add another
allocation to the directories data space, takes up no more
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While potentially a useful option, you wouldn't want the protocol to
automatically always check for it, since it would preclude rsync on
This extension need not break any existing mechanism; if the hash of
the receiver's copy of the file doesn't
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just confirmed that data corruption can occasionally occur with
rsync 2.5.0 when the -z option is used.
Please keep the two directories that caused the problems, if they have
not already been overwritten.
Are you sure you're running 2.5.0 at both
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just ran into the same corruption problem with 2.5.1pre3. Again, it
only happens when I use large checksum block sizes (65536) *and*
request compression (-z).
My apologies, this fix went in after 2.5.1pre3. Would you please try
either using CVS
On 10 Dec 2001, mike harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if it were possible with rsync to
exclude certain lines in a file before it syncs them
up to update the diferrences. I have files on two
systems that the first 10 lines are unique to each
system but the rest of the lines in
Incidentally, here's an interesting BitKeeper demostration/tutorial:
http://www.bitkeeper.com/demo/
--
Martin
On 7 Dec 2001, Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't take this path - ownerships on symlinks are a pretty
meaningless concept
Right. For just this reason I just changed the regression test to use
an included tiny ls, rather than the system's ls, because on some
systems the
On 6 Dec 2001, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a list of cosmetic changes I'd be willing to make to the code in order
to make it more consistent, which stylisticly it currently is not.
- separate function definitions by 2 newlines
- put spaces after commas in arg lists
- put
On 21 Nov 2001, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:54:18AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Here's a patch, based on Max Bowsher's patch. If deemed useful I will supply
the man patch as well.
--no-detach patch committed.
--
Martin
rsync://samba.org/rsyncftp/preview/
rsync 2.5.1 (sometime in 2001?)
ENHANCEMENTS:
* --progress and -P now show estimated data transfer rate (in a
multiple of bytes/s) and estimated time to completion. Based
on a patch by Rik Faith.
* --no-detach option, required
On 5 Dec 2001, Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's set to localhost because this is going over an stunnel. Yes, I did
try it without the stunnel and same results. How can I debug this. This
is 2.4.6 on both sides because 2.5.0 just fails completely for uploading
and
Andrew and I thought it might be an interesting experiment to move
rsync to using BitKeeper rather than CVS for source code control.
For a project with rsync's size and activity CVS is actually fine, but
it would be a nice toe in the water with BitKeeper to get some
practical experience before
On 5 Dec 2001, Juan J. L?pez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave:
With archive bit I mean a MS-DOS file attribute (like read
only, system or hidden). When the archive attribute of a
file is set, that file is presumed to be changed after the last
backup and then must be copied again. The
On 4 Dec 2001, SUMIKAWA Munechika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be sufficient for us to just read into a byte array large
enough to hold all reasonable IPv6 encodings, and then cast it as
appropriate? I have not had a chance to follow this idea through yet.
I don't think at most
On 4 Dec 2001, SUMIKAWA Munechika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
client_addr(), client_name() always fails for IPv6 connection sice in
most of system,
sizeof(struct sockaddr_in) sizeof(struct sockaddr) sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6)
you should use sockaddr_storage for getpeername(). here is
I see rsync has this in rsync.h
#ifndef HAVE_LCHOWN
#define lchown chown
#endif
So on Linux lchown changes the ownership on a symlink, whereas chown
on a symlink will change the ownership of its target. man lchown says
In versions of Linux prior to 2.1.81 (and distinct from
On 30 Nov 2001, Thomas J Pinkl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing:
bit length overflow
code 4 bits 6-7
in the output of rsync 2.5.0 between two Red Hat Linux systems.
One is RH 6.1 (kernel 2.2.19-6.2.1, glibc 2.1.3-22), the other
is RH 7.2 (kernel 2.4.9-13, glibc 2.2.4-19). Both
Does anybody care about supporting non-English message locales in
rsync? (Do all sysadmins speak English? :-) Would anybody contribute
translations if we had the framework?
--
Martin
On 2 Dec 2001, Heikki Vatiainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled and tried rsync 2.5.0 but could not get the server
running. loadparm.c:string_set() now calls free() which it did not do
in 2.4.6 and this free() tries to free memory that was not allocated
with malloc.
Thankyou for the
On 30 Nov 2001, Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch for rsync 2.5.0 to fix the make check option.
Thankyou, commmitted.
--
Martin
201 - 300 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
