On 10-09-10 21:13, Hans Troost wrote:
So my exclude-files contains:
.*
the include file contains:
.kde4/share/apps/kabc/distlists
.kde4/share/apps/kabc/std.vcf
Result:
1. Success: 2 .kde4/share/apps/kabc-files
Are you sure about that part ? '.*' ('H, .*' as seen by sending rsync)
should
On 09.09.2010 02:05, Michal Soltys wrote:
On 10-09-09 01:07, Craig Bell wrote:
1) 1st delete pass, honoring global (on B or sent from A, if rsync was
executed on A) and per directory (on B) rules of what to protect/delete
(see --filter's options R P)
2) 2nd transfer pass
To be a bit more
On 10-09-09 20:17, Craig Bell wrote:
Michal Soltys wrote:
As stated, I would prefer this, however I do not have enough space to keep
two editions of the files.
I must delete as I go along, however I don't want to delete everything up
front, and risk exposure.
My workaround was to run
On 10-09-09 01:07, Craig Bell wrote:
Hello, I use rsync v3.0.7 with --delete-during, but it appears to act more like
--delete-before. I've checked the docs and list archives, but I am still discovering
some of the subtleties of rsync, and I can't see where I'm going wrong. There's an
Backup options are concered with files from what I can see after some
tests. Extra directory (--backup-dir) is an addition to keep things more
tidy. I guess the idea was to have some sort of protection against
careless rsync invocation, etc. - not as a solution for incremental
backups. I don't
listserv.traf...@sloop.net wrote:
I've done quite a bit of looking, but I haven't found an answer that
answers this question.
Environment:
cygwin on Windows
rsync 3.0.4
Using a native windows sync tool, a sync of the source to the
destination takes perhaps 5 minutes. (~24G, 80K files) However
Fabian Cenedese wrote:
I also use cwrsync but the few cases where the path was too
long I just shortened the source. Of course that may not be
possible for you.
bye Fabi
Remember about cygwin1.dll with utf8 support (using unicode win32 api).
Side effect of it is that the paths are limited
drc...@yahoo.com wrote:
But the scheduled backups never happen. I must be doing something wrong, but
can't figure out what.
All help would be gratefully appreciated. Not sure if this is an rsync issue or
a FreeBSD / Crontab issue.
Cron might be ignoring $PATH, so the scripts called don't
Carney Mimms wrote:
I am now able to ssh from remote to local and local to remote without
passwords using RSA keys, but if I run the script without sudo, i.e.
Sudo /usr/local/bin/rsync ... It can’t copy files that need root
permissions. If I leave out the sudo and run the script after becoming
Harry Putnam wrote:
I must be seriously misunderstanding the man page coverage of
--compre-dest. My take was that if a file in compare-dest=dir
matches a file in SOURCE/ then it won't be transferred to DEST/.
I tried this test. (d1 has single files and 2 subdir with files)
cp -a d1 d1a
Either way - as a workaround, you could drop delete-excluded, and
then just finalize the thing with something like: find /bar/ -depth
-name .rsync-partial -exec rm -rf {} \;
I meant more like: -name .rsync-partial -prune -exec .
Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam wrote:
Makes sense. And
Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam wrote:
... then without -f 'R .rp/', dst/.rp is not removed. With -f 'R .rp/',
it is removed but if dst/a is updated then we have the same issue (exit
with code 23). This is entirely consistent with your strace i.e. code
23 whenever there are two separate
Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a bug, but after reading the manual, this does
not seem like expected behavior. I'm using the following rsync command
to approximate an atomic update (I can't use --link-dest as hard links
in hfsplus filesystems are fubar
Steve Lefevre wrote:
I'm using cygwin to backup files from a windows machine to a unix host
with rsync. I originally uploaded the bulk of the files using a
windows ftp client, and then planned on doing updates nightly with
rsync.
This can also be important, especially regarding how the ftp
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi again
I have a directory logfiles and inside it it has lots of sub
directories. Inside it there are lots of .gz, .txt and .sql files
I want only .sql files to be rsynced to the destination host
is there a way to achieve it using rsync utility
Assuming you won't
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
I want only .sql files to be rsynced to the destination host.
when i do rsync -avz oldUnicelFiles hostB:/home/kaushal
--include-from=include.txt
it rsync all the files under oldUnicelFiles, I mean even .gz and .txt
files too.
~/oldUnicelFiles $ ls
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi
I do rsync -avz oldUnicelFiles hostB:/home/kaushal
--exclude-from=exclude.txt
but it rsynced the excluded files too
my exclude.txt file contains
/home/kaushal/oldUnicelFiles/*.gz
/home/kaushal/oldUnicelFiles/*.txt
Any
Etienne D wrote:
Hi !
I would like to know if it's possible for Rsync to automatically mirror a
folder and it's content from one deamon to another. (or one client to a
deamon) Basically I want users to drag and drop files in a folder and Rsync
to mirror these files as soon as it sees them. A
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
It's not a folder that Windows will allow me to delete, so
consequently rsync will attempt to do that and fail. Adding
--exclude=Network Trash Folder has absolutely no effect what so ever.
Any suggestions?
You could use --ignore-errors - with this, rsync
Matthew Monaco wrote:
What is the difference between exclude and hide in the filter rules?
Normally, 'hide' is interpreted only by the sender and the files will
never show up in the file list sent to the receiver. 'Exclude' is both
'hide' (sender) and 'protect' (receiver) - so files that
Administrator wrote:
Hi,
[cut]
Number of files: 2
Number of files transferred: 1
Total file size: 584742598 bytes
Total transferred file size: 584742598 bytes
Literal data: 584742598 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 118
File list generation time: 0.002 seconds
File list transfer
Hedley J. Phillips wrote:
Question 2:
The time taken to run the command is the same with or without the
switch. Why is this? I would expect the command with the no whole file
switch to run faster as it only has to transfer a portion of the entire
file.
Do you mean precisely the same, or
Matt McCutchen wrote:
(It would have made my life easier if you had replied directly to that
message so I didn't have to search for it.)
Ahh yes - it was an old thread back from June - I kinda did, but the
question was a bit weird different and the thread ended.
Either way, sorry.
If I
A good while ago I asked about difference between --delete-during/delay
and --delete-after, when per-directory files are updated (all is
perfectly clear for me here), but during the discussion there was a hint
made by Wayne, that the outcome can differ in more situations:
It is useful for
Few remarks:
Greg Shenaut wrote:
--delete-excluded: delete files no longer present any excluded files
Yes.
You can achieve the same with 'H' or 'R' instead of '-', without having
to specify --delete-excluded. 'H' is sender-only exclude, 'R' is
receiver-only include.
In your case:
Wayne Davison wrote:
Diffs are always welcomed. Please feel free.
..wayne..
Allright, tiny update to the rsync.yo file.
I haven't included information about backup/suffix case you mentioned,
as I'm not sure about the details yet.
--- rsync.yo.org2008-05-17 18:45:28.0
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:58:34PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote:
have per-dir filter files being updated, its works the same as
--delete-after (if we disregard certain backup-file cases where the
suffix is not excluded), just more optimally.
You mean - the difference
becca23 wrote:
I'm using the rsync protocol to keep a windows and linux system mirrored. I
have set up the rsync and ssh to run properly, but I would like to know if
there is an option, whether in the rsync command or placed in the
rsyncd.conf file where I can call a script that runs each time
becca23 wrote:
Would you do this using the ssh -s option?
Just regular command, like ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'ls -al /'
also, would this run the script before or after rsync completes?
That depends on your needs.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
Hello
I've noticed today, that --delete-delay introduced in 3.0.2 is not
functionally equivalent of --delete-after (I was under impression it
should work this way).
Looking at following example:
/src
/src/testfile
/src/.rf
/dst
/dst/testfile
.rf consists of following lines:
S, .rf
H, *
Wayne Davison wrote:
per-dir rules set right for both the on-going copying, and a late delete
scan). I don't think this is likely to change any time soon, but it
would be nice to have a way of doing something like early per-dir filter
copying or something.
..wayne..
Oki, thanks for
31 matches
Mail list logo
