On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:33:43AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:33:06 -0800, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd suggest also changing the last line of the function:
> >
> > -return file_compare(&f1, &f2);
> > +return file_compare(f1p, f2p)
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:04:34AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:11:54 -0800, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:04:19AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:36:03PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> One complicating factor of getting rid of dev+inode in the flist_struct
> is that some of the old-protocol code uses these values to fix a bug in
> directory deletion order in protocols prior to 19. I'd suggest that we
> just dump su
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:04:19AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:46:52PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> [ snip ]
> >> This seems like a good way to go to me.
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 05:11:04PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:18:30PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > It puts us back into the business of doing a link lookup for every
> > regular file.
>
> Ah yes, I missed that. Adding a flag would be suf
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:34:49AM -0600, Max Kipness wrote:
> Hope this isnt' too off topic...
>
> I have a tree structure on one server similar to the following:
>
> /Current
> /01-04-2003
> /01-03-2003
>
> etc...
>
> /Current holds the most recent rsynced data, and the date directories
>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:44:37AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Your changes are almost identical to mine, so I will address only the
> m
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:46:52PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:12:16PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > - init_hard_links() sets nlinks in file_struct.
>
> I assume you mean by counting adjacent runs of identical inodes after
> the sort is done (while
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 05:34:04AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:23:17 -0800, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:30:03AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> >
> > I'm noodling on the idea of purging the hlink_list of
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:44:37AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:35:03AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
>
> >> I've modified hlink.c to use a list of file struct pointe
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:30:03AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:35:03AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> > I've modified hlink.c to use a list of file struct pointers instead of
> > copies of the actual file structs themselves, so that will save memory.
Minor corrections...
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:35:03AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> Lester,
>
> You articulated your situation clear enough for me. Thanks.
>
> I'll address your issue about when rsync is running locally for /vol/N
> to /vol/N_mirror syncing, it exhausts all of the RAM and sw
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:35:03AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> Lester,
>
> You articulated your situation clear enough for me. Thanks.
>
> I'll address your issue about when rsync is running locally for /vol/N
> to /vol/N_mirror syncing, it exhausts all of the RAM and swap.
>
> If you haven'
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:16:55PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:51:07PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > The question is, should link-dest make the decision based on the
> > source uid/gid or based on the uid/gid the file winds up with.
>
> I think it
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:02:16PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 07:34:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I assumed numeric id's are not used unless explictly asked for.
>
> As I expected, the code is not dealing with the IDs properly when
> running as a non-root user
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:56:44PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I assume that older versions of rsync would still exhibit the problem
> > > (since we have a patch relating to this in the upcoming 2.6.0).
> >
&g
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:23:30PM -0800, Doug Floer wrote:
> I'm running into a problem rsynchronizing over an rsh connection on the same
> subnet. I get variations of the "unexpected tag" error, consistently failing
> within io.c at line 298:
>
> unexpected tag 88
> rsync error: error in rsync
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:10:08PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 07:34:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The numeric id's are different, but I assumed numeric id's are not used
> > unless explictly asked for.
>
> Internally we use ID numbers, but the code tries to tr
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:27:21AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi --
>
> I'm experiencing problems when using rsync between two different machines.
> Details follows:
>
> Both machines are running 2.4.23, rsync versions on both are identically
> configured versions of 2.5.7:
>
> rsync
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 03:26:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 05:23:21PM -0500, acct svcs wrote:
> > AFAIK, the daemon is running as root.
>
> Quoting from the rsyncd.conf file you cited:
>
> uid = server1
> gid = server1
>
> Comment-out these lines.
He
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:55:19PM -0500, Cristian Gafton wrote:
>
> I have been trying for quite a while now to understand why is the
> flist.c:f_name() function implemented using static buffers. Anyone care to
> comment?
>
> The immediate problem is that any call to f_name overrides the previ
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 02:06:59PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:48:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > Sounds good to me. Should this be sent to rsync-announce?
>
> I had been assuming that just the announcement of the final 2.6.0
> release would go
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:32:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had
> been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally
> decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give
> folks a final opportunity
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:45:52AM +0100, alain content wrote:
> Right,
> Renaming does not touch the file - it only changes the directory
> modification date.
>
> And you are absolutely right. Panther preserves case but is insensitive to
> case in file names :
> ls
> >...
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 ac ac
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Manuel Mollar wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry if this is well known.
> Suposse I am transferring a large (by now) file, say 1Gbyte with --partial:
> rsync -e ssh -a --partial 1gbfile server:
> If process is interrumpted, temporary file is renamed to good filename
>
modification
> datestamp) when you rename it?
>
> -J
>
> jw schultz wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 12:28:06PM +0100, alain content wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>I found this surprising behavior with rsync (version 2.5.7 protocol
> >>version 26
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 12:28:06PM +0100, alain content wrote:
> Hi,
> I found this surprising behavior with rsync (version 2.5.7 protocol
> version 26) on Mac OS X (Panther, 10.3.2) :
>
> Suppose you have a folder "Source" containing a file named "abc", and its
> backup as folder "Clone", cre
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 03:48:24PM -0500, tabris wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Noted in the readme that rsync is licensed under GPL, and have some
> questions about this.
>
> Reading through a couple different places on the internet, of people
> wondering why ther
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:35:09AM -0800, Hannes Kocznar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm transfering a whole linux root dir (+ subdirs) to a backup location.
> I tried -avr and -avrc switches.
> My problem is that rsync somewhat seems to transfer nearly everything (2960
> files!) while only maybe 10 or 15 we
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:00:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How can I find out what files wheren't transferred If I have error:
>
>rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at
> main.c(1045)
>
> running rsync?
>
> I've tried "rsync -v[v][v]" but had no suc
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:14:05PM +0100, Sayan wrote:
> Ron DuFresne wrote:
> >sure avoid all perm/user issues by making the whole server suid. seen
> >kids do that when they tired of having to su - root on their linux systems.
> >
> this command is only one line extracted from a script. Syncing
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Sayan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently setting up a backup script for the /home directory of a
> server. I send all the files on a remote machine through LAN connection
> using rsync to optimize bandwidth usage.
>
> The script is run as root on the serve
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:45:50AM -0800, John Davis wrote:
> Here's my command copied from a shell script:\
>
> rsync --verbose --progress --stats --compress --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh
> --recursive --times --perms --links \
> /home/* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/remotebackups/
>
> Here's some (a small part) of
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:37:40AM -0800, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> I notice that devices are not hardlinked when using the --link-dest
> option, for instance:
>
> rsync -aH --link-dest=../bar/ foo/ baz/
>
> When foo/zero is a device, baz/zero is not a hardlink to bar/zero. How
> come?
Becau
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:14:56PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Fri 19 Dec 2003, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> > Please test this and let me know if we have any remaining issues to work
> > through before the final release. Thanks,
>
> One tiny little nit, when compiling on alpha, I get the follo
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 03:06:20PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> J.W.
>
> The memory error was a correctable logged at 15:30 PM, with the
> apparent time on the rsync issue being 23:00.
>
> It would be nice to see everything tie together but I don't see
> it this time (I've have pushed the same c
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:14:21PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Hello rsync list,
>
> I am running a Solaris 8 system and have rsync 1.6.2 protocal 14 installed.
> We have updated (wed 17-dec) to the latest Solaris 8 recommended patch set.
>
> When performing an rsync of two local UFS partiti
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:23:37AM -0500, Michael J. Lynn wrote:
> I am attempting to use rsync to backup a Win98 laptop to a FreeBSD 4.8
> backup server. I have experienced the same problem at roughly the same
> point in the process on two occations. The laptop contains ~2.7Gb of data.
> On the
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:30:27PM -0600, Elvar wrote:
> Hi all, I ran across a few threads on google regarding FreeBSD's rsync mknod
> problem but I didn't find any good fix. I was wondering if anyone knows more
> about this and a good fix. Here's an example of the output.
There has been a patch
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:34:45AM +1100, Tomasz Ciolek wrote:
> Scotty
>
> As far as I know rsync build a list of files and attributes + checksums
> in memory. This can cause a large memory footprint while running the
> process, so 72MB of data for 4.2 million files is only about right,
> dependi
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:12:31PM -0500, Steve Howie wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Rsync has been churning away for 45 mins, presumably bulding an in-core
> list of files to be copied to the destination. This is a very very large
> filesystem we are copying locally - approximately 4.2million files
> (We
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:31:13AM -0800, james houston wrote:
> I would like to have my computer at home and my
> computer at work to share the same bookmarks. My idea
> was to have each of the computers sync with a server's
> bookmark file. If the client has a newer file than the
> server it woul
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:43:40AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jw schultz writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:18:15PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hard-link handling
&g
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:53:22AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Tue 16 Dec 2003, jw schultz wrote:
> >
> > I remember this as well and the root of the problem was not
> > that rsync didn't wait long enough but that ssh was not
> > resetting the tty for
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:27:42PM +0900, Charles Nadeau wrote:
> Max Kipness wrote:
>
> >> Another option is to upgrade to the CVS version (available in
> >> the near future as version 2.6.0) and use the --files-from
> >> option to specify your files (since it already parses the
> >> names one pe
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:05:50AM +0900, Charles Nadeau wrote:
> Max Kipness wrote:
>
> >> > I am trying to rsync folders/files hosted on a Windows machine to a
> >> > Linux machine. Many of the directory names have spaces in them.
> >> > How can I list them in a file so that the --include-from o
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:25:51PM -0400, Wesley Joyce wrote:
> I am having a problem with rsync hanging after completion. The command I
> am using is: rsync -vaz --delete /banproc/ backenp650:/banproc (thanks jw
> for the syntax correction)
>
> There were 56 deletions on the destination and ~
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:02:26PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:42:58AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 06:42:29PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > > Below is a revised file with a TOC at the top.
> >
> > Cool, looks lik
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:33:29PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:45:12PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > I've noticed (at least when using -e ssh) that if ssh prompts for a
> > password or such, and you hit ctrl-c, you're more often than not left
> > with a tty with screw
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:53:54PM -0400, Wesley Joyce wrote:
> I am having a problem with rsync not deleting files on the destination that
> no longer exist on the source. The command I am using is: rsync -vaz
> --delete /bantemp/* backenp650:/bantemp
I assume the files at issue are directly i
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:18:15PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK, first pass on TODO complete.
>
> > PERFORMANCE --
>
> > T
I changed the description to be a reporting error since that
seemed to be what the bug was.
Martin, do you concur with John's assessment? If so i'll
queuue it for removal after i commit the reorg.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:51:16PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 200
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:42:58AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 06:42:29PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > Below is a revised file with a TOC at the top.
>
> Cool, looks like you did a very thorough edit pass (as compared to my
> quick once-over). The
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:37:38AM -0800, Penelope Fudd wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I'm attempting to copy/sync a development directory on my laptop to our
> web server, and for some reason dot-files are being copied but not
> deleted.
>
> Command line:
> rsync -rvva --delete-after -e ssh ./ server.com:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Jürgen Albinger wrote:
[reformatted -- excessively long lines]
> Hi All
>
> We sync our Novell-Servers Version 6 with the Parameter
> *avz to our Backupsrv. When a file is changed or it's
> new, the file where sync to Backupsrv, the Archive-Flag is
> se
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:29:36PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:11:41PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > It would be worthwhile to add a note in INSTALL to advise people of
> > the --with-rsh configure option.
>
> I would not currently recommend that
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:51:25AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:51:08AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > I made one pass through the TODO and INSTALL files looking for outdated
> > info. I'd appreciate some other eyes giving these a quick scan.
>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:51:08AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:03:28AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
>
> > The one thing i really would have liked to have seen in a version bump
> > would have been changing the default remote shell to ssh instead of
>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:51:08AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:03:28AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > I wish we had a better handle on the cygwin hang and craigb-perf but i
> > don't want to slow things down.
>
> It sounds like Cygwin might
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:57:05AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:32:07PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> > would you care to take the bull by the horns and produce a release
> > candidate for 2.5.8 so that the rsync enthusiasts on the rsync mailing
> > list can give it a w
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:54:34AM -0500, Tim Boyer wrote:
> I'm running rsync 2.5.7 on Data General dg/ux 4.20, and just noticed that
> the --delete command is not deleting.
>
> # />ls -la /test
> total 5
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root other 512 Dec 13 10:46 .
> drwxr-xr-x 37 root root
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:49:51PM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've found a need to list the files to transfer in a files since
> our command lines got too long. Anyway, the attached patch
> implements reading from a file with two command line options.
>
> The first is from-fil
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:48:24PM +0200, Vasil Kolev wrote:
> Hi to all,
> I've looked at the archives, asked google, and found no solution, so
> that's why i'm asking this here. I thought that this should be solved in
> some way, but surprisilngly, it looks like it isn't...
>
> I'm running a d
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:54:25PM -0500, Vu Huynh wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> My name is Vu Huynh. I'm currently work for Atmel Corporation. We're
> using Rsync v2.5.7 to rsync design kits between our remote sites. It works
> fine for all small kit directories. However, there is 1 BI
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:11:27PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I've merged the security fixes that were released in version 2.5.7 into
> CVS. I also made similar changes to the malloc() calls that are new in
> the CVS version. This version has received very minimal testing, but it
> looks good
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:16:02PM -0800, Izzy Kindred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The rsync man page shows example invocations that use the
> "--server" option. I could not find documentation for this option (a)
> in the man page (b) in the HTML man page on the website (c) in the
> "--help" help.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:03:50PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2003, at 12:25 PM, jw schultz wrote:
> >>>Sounds like another OSX bug.
> >>
> >>Indeed, it seems that the utime() call in darwin fails with EPERM if
> >>the target is not ow
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:28:19AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:24 PM, jw schultz wrote:
>
> >>But I did some more investigation and have a bit more information:
> >>
> >>(1) This happens only if I don't own the destination directory
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:58:39PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2003, at 6:27 PM, jw schultz wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:30:55AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
> >>On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:52 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:57:00PM -0800, tim wrote:
> Forgot to mention this:
>
> server: rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26
> clients: rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24
Almost nobody can comment on the behavior of rsync versions
from the previous millenium. There have been too ma
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:30:55AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:52 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:27:37AM -0800, James Berry wrote:
> >>But the directory inode doesn't need to be updated. It is up to date.
> >
> >If the modified time of the directory i
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:07:42PM -0500, Corey Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using rsync for a long time to send web files from a development
> server to a production server. It worked great
> until a few days ago when I upgraded the firmware on the Linksys BEFSR11
> Router that the pro
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:21:34PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
> Passing the -t option to rsync seems to cause -v to show each directory
> that is considered, while -v without -t doesn't.
>
> Is this a known bug or intended feature? Or is there a way to defeat
> this? I'd like -v to show the files
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 04:15:13PM -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
> I'm getting an error trying to pull a file with ssh/rsync:
>
> $ rsync -e 'ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa' [EMAIL PROTECTED]::www/index.html index.html
> rsync: unable to open configuration file "rsyncd.conf": No such file or
> directory
> rsy
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 05:44:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using rsync to backup Maildir directories. Since it is very active,
> some files are deleted (and some are added as new mail arrive) from the
> time that the list of files are collected and the time of the actual
> operation.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:00:27PM +0800, Leaw, Chern Jian wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have a filesystem containing a symbolic link.
> pglc0003> ls -l |grep TA
> lrwxrwxrwx1 cleawadm26 Nov 19 17:23 TA ->
> /pgadm1/adm/cleaw/tempArea
>
> I'd like to copy the symbolic link TA to the /tm
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:11:31PM +0100, Kleiner Hampel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i am syncing 2 directorys with rsync.
> There is nothing to do (i didn't changed anything).
> Here is the output:
>
> building file list ... done
> wrote 371 bytes read 20 bytes 782.00 bytes/sec
> total size is 5062161
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:39:50PM +1300, Paul William wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible for different users to sync their home directory's (which
> reside on the same server) using rsync. By that I mean that usera will
> using rsync to sync /home/usera and userb will sync /home/userb on the
> s
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:58:11PM -0500, Daemian Mack wrote:
> I've got an rsyncd.secrets file with 59 accounts in it. Almost all
> these need to be enabled concurrently. My rsyncd.conf thus has an auth
> users field with upward of 50 values. I'm starting to wonder at what
> point I'll have
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:52:53AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 06:04, jw schultz wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:14:56AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> [...]
> > I had thought so too but now i'm less sure.
> >
> > I put it u
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:30:53PM -0800, Pete Wenzel wrote:
> The rsync 2.5.6 TODO file mentions the need for hard link test cases.
> Here is one in which a linked file is unnecessarily transferred in full.
>
> # Setup initial directories
> mkdir src dest
> dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024 count=10
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:04:48PM +0200, Johan wrote:
> Hi,
> rsync version 2.5.6 protocol 26.used in mdk 9.2
> I have some difficulties..
> As user internet...in console..
> command...
> rsync -auvr /home/internet/tstrsync1/ /mnt/win_d/tstmdk1/ 1> auvr-me.txt 2>
> auvr-me.err
>
> results
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:14:54PM +0100, Nazar Hassan wrote:
[reformatted -- please use shorter lines]
> Hello,
>
> I use rsync in the company to make a backup every 4 hours.
>
> but I would like to do in a way like this, that the rsync
> make a backup of the changed files until one mont
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:44:54AM -0600, daniel wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:53:10AM -0600, daniel wrote:
> > > Thank you for clarifying the issue with regard to the fact that the
> > > exclude pattern is relative to the destination path.
You are welcome.
> >
> > No, it's relative
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:46:38AM +0100, Dirk Pape wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Thanks for your fast answer to my problem. I am now happy to have a clear
> position from the developer of rsync (though I am not very happy with the
> position itself ;-).
>
> --Am Dienstag, 25. November 2003 12:14
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:14:56AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?wrote:
> >?On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:49:45AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> >>?
> >>?Aside from numerous other weaknesses that have crept into
>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 06:24:27AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. Hopefully someone can shed some light on this:
>
> We've got a production server with _LOTS_ of files on it. The system is a dual
> XEON with 4GB of RAM. During the evening, the load is very low. Linux shows
> (via 'top'
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:20:16PM -0500, Jim Salter wrote:
> > over ssh on windows. Rsync apparently works OK as a daemon
> > on whendoze and when accessing an rsync daemon.
>
> Actually I'm using Rsync as a client under cygwin / win2K to access rsync in
> daemon mode on a FreeBSD 5.1 server. T
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:28:38PM -0500, Jim Salter wrote:
> Has any progress ever been made towards fixing the problem
> causing rsync processes to hang in the cygwin environment?
> I've tried just using Unison in the windows environment,
> since it has a native port, but, um. Unison is probably
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:03:42AM -0500, Gavin Durman wrote:
> Whenever a Windows XP
> system opens a file on the NW server, and then saves the changes, the
> date/time stamp doesn't change,
That is a serious bug. It isn't an rsync problem per se.
If the file sizes don't change to work around
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:59:27PM +0800, Sethu Subramanian Rengarajan wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to change the rsync default port to something other than 873. I
> changed in the rsyncd.conf file. But, still it listens to 873 only.
>
> How to fix this issue.
Given that rsyncd.conf doesn't have a
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:08:12AM -0800, Pier Paolo Glave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use rsync to backup a linux filesystem
> to a windows server.
> I followed the hints that I found at
> http://www.tiarnan.phlegethon.org/rsyncntdoc.html to
> run rsync on windows, and it works quite well.
>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:35:09PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> If the rsyncd.conf has a line such as:
>
> log file = /var/log/rsync/log
>
> and /var/log/rsync doesn't exist or isn't a directory (or the log file
> can't be opened for any other reason), then there's no warning
> whatsoever, as rs
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:14:46PM -, Haisam K. Ido wrote:
> but I do have the recursive option on
>
> -rvaz
Then you procede to exclude all subdirs not matching *.lis
READ the "EXCLUDE PATTERNS" section a few more times
and/or read the list archives.
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:02:56PM
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:30:32PM +, Alun wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I've only just joined this list, but I can't find any mention of this
> idea anywhere else, so I thought I'd just post here before getting too
> deep into programming and possibly reinventing the wheel.
>
> Here at Aber, we
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:02:56PM -, Haisam K. Ido wrote:
> Why does'nt this work?
>
> rsync -rvaz --include="*.lis" --exclude='*' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/ .
> receiving file list ... done
> client: nothing to do: perhaps you need to specify some filenames or the
> --recursive option?
Looks
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:15:03PM -0600, Rich Winkel wrote:
> Hi, I hope this hasn't been asked before ... I couldn't find it anyway.
>
> To the best of my knowledge, without the -c option rsync judges file
> differences based on date stamp and file size. This speeds things up
> of course but ca
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:44:18AM -0800, cam wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Can anyone give me a hint on how to specify an IPv6 address in an
> rsync address literal - the colon character is already used to
> seperate the host name from the remote directory AFAICT... I get, e.g.
>
> rsync -Cavb 3ffe:50
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Joe Batt wrote:
> Would it help if rsync detected whether it is run as root or not and
> enable or disabled these features automatically (with warnings). I've
> wasted lots of time trying to get rsync to work in userland due to
> safety checks like this (m
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:52:22PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ... This fix is also in CVS (along with several others).
>
> As another poster pointed out recently, it's been a long time since
> 2.5.6 was released (Jan 28 2003
101 - 200 of 980 matches
Mail list logo
