https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #8 from Ben RUBSON ---
Wayne, I then just tested your patch, and it works as expected.
One thing perhaps, just to be sure.
I used an absolute partial-dir path during my tests.
It is not deleted after the partial file has been completed
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #7 from Ben RUBSON ---
Wayne, thank you very much for your detailed answer and for your patch
proposal.
Let me go through this and come back to you shortly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #6 from Wayne Davison ---
Created attachment 15941
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=15941&action=edit
A simpler patch that just uses in-place updates of partial-dir files when
possible
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #4 from Ben RUBSON ---
Hi Wayne,
Let's review & merge this new feature ?
Thank you very much !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting th
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #3 from Ben RUBSON ---
Thank you for your feedback Ferran !
I'm not sure about why this patch hasn't been landed yet :)
Regarding benefits of using this option in conjunction with --link-dest.
Well, certainly same benefit as without :
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
Ferran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pallares.fer...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Fer
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #1 from Ben RUBSON ---
Tested and still correctly works with rsync 3.1.3.
Thx !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.