[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #41 from Mihnea-Costin Grigore --- The discussion about file systems like ZFS/BTRFS/etc. and their various snapshot mechanisms is off-topic relative to this feature request, since they are very different technologies used for different

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #39 from andy --- > This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc > are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. Funny I am doing exactly this, but I came to rsync looking for a backup for when ZFS fails.

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #38 from Claudius Ellsel --- This basically is some personal preference. I know that I can do this on btrfs (which is used on the system I want to back up from), also pretty easy with tools like snapper. Maybe it would be feasible to do

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #37 from elatl...@gmail.com --- The btrfs equivalent is a bit more rough but (link for rename); #./btrfs-snapshots-diff.py -sb -p /media/btrfs/v_1/s_1 -c /media/btrfs/v_1/s_2 | grep -E path=. | grep -v utimes | tail -n +2

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #36 from elatl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #35) > This is going off-topic On such an old bug with modern workarouds I think it's worth talking about. > backup drive is NTFS currently, which would

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #35 from Claudius Ellsel --- (In reply to elatllat from comment #34) >Yes you can easily access files on a COW-FS backup; it's a file system, that's >>what it's for. This is going off-topic, but my backup drive is NTFS currently,

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #34 from elatl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #33) Yes you can easily access files on a COW-FS backup; it's a file system, that's what it's for. If you want to review changes before backup you can just diff

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #33 from Claudius Ellsel --- Hm, those backups won't work on file level, though afaik. Thus I cannot easily access files on a backup drive for example. Also I want to use this as some kind of confirm stage a bit like committing with git

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #32 from elatl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #31) Yes any COW FS with "send/receive" will have inherent rename handaling, and will be faster than rsync because the diffs are inherent. With zfs one can even

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #31 from Claudius Ellsel --- To me and others it still seems relevant. I have to admit though that I haven't looked much into other solutions for backups like btrfs send/receive commands. I suppose that were the ones you meant? Note

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #30 from elatl...@gmail.com --- This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. --

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #29 from Claudius Ellsel --- As another motivation for this, I use rsync for backups and would like to be able to see whether files have just been renamed or were deleted and some others newly created (which currently cannot be

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 Claudius Ellsel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||claudius.ell...@live.de --- Comment #28

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann --- Hi, I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing sizes and modtimes on

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON --- ### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ? If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either a file that has an identical size and

Re: [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 + samba-b...@samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajo...@gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request > myself, I found everything here and basically have the

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #25 from Andrey Gursky --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 + samba-b...@samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajo...@gmail.com --- > Looking for this

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 + samba-b...@samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajo...@gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #23 from dajo...@gmail.com --- Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request myself, I found everything here and basically have the same use case. My version is that I am creating a regular backup of logs

Re: [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

Isn't this pretty much what specifying --fuzzy --fuzzy (twice) is supposed to do? Joe On 01/03/2015 04:23 PM, samba-b...@samba.org wrote: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #22 from elatl...@gmail.com --- Wow 10 years. Maybe one reason this has not been implemented

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #22 from elatl...@gmail.com --- Wow 10 years. Maybe one reason this has not been implemented is there are other options. For example I have been using a shell script as a wrapper to reduce the iteration of this bug, here is how it

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #21 from Petr Pisar petr.pi...@atlas.cz 2014-06-02 16:47:06 UTC --- There is a bug #8847 in the patchset when partial-dir cannot be created. The fix is described there. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #20 from kevin.la...@gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC --- I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master I

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #19 from Norman Freudenberg ko...@gmx.net 2014-01-04 22:56:00 UTC --- Hey as far I found out there are two patches which still note made it into the last official release? They are still buggy? Why didn't it made it to an official

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #18 from bug me not b...@mailinator.com 2012-12-08 10:05:46 UTC --- Has this issue been abandoned? It's been a while... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #15 from bugzilla.samba@zmi.at 2011-02-04 02:50 CST --- How to apply those 2 detect-renamed* patches? I did git clone git://git.samba.org/rsync.git and tried to patch -p1 patches/detect-renamed.diff but that doesn't

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #16 from ma...@sonadresse.com 2011-02-04 10:22 CST --- you don't need git to get the sources : http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/ and choose rsync-3.0.7.tar.gz and rsync-patches-3.0.7.tar.gz Ben -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #17 from bugzilla.samba@zmi.at 2011-02-04 13:43 CST --- Damn, that was too easy ;-) Thanks a lot. I'll test the new detect-renamed* patches now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #14 from ma...@sonadresse.com 2011-01-29 02:10 CST --- Hi Paul, As mentionned previously, two patches have been developped (detect-renamed.diff et detect-renamed-lax.diff)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #11 from phil.ganc...@gmail.com 2010-10-28 00:31 CST --- Here are some related discussions about this: http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg20283.html http://markmail.org/message/kmazkprjvred2r5a --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla.samba@zmi.at ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 sha...@shahar-or.co.il changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sha...@shahar-or.co.il ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-30 17:24 CST --- (In reply to comment #5) Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is incrementing the filename number at each rotation period

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-10 16:09 CST --- (In reply to comment #6) Is the patch not included in 2.6.9 or did I miss something? Correct, --detect-renamed still exists as a patch; it is not in the main version of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-21 14:06 MST --- Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz - httpd.11.gz). --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-07 07:25 MST --- There is now a patch named detect_renamed.diff in the patches dir that implements the basics of finding renamed files. This will probably go onto the trunk for the release

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-13 22:24 --- Note that the --fuzzy patch has made it into the CVS version. It only looks for renamed files in the same directory as the file being created, though, so it is not a

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 01:58 --- I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which is really