https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
--- Comment #8 from Brian K. White br...@aljex.com 2011-06-06 15:36:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I've committed a change to 3.1.0dev git that allows a pre-xfer exec script to
send an error message to go with its non-zero exit status. This
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pollock andrew-samba-bugzi...@andrew.net.au
2011-06-05 16:24:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I've committed a change to 3.1.0dev git that allows a pre-xfer exec script to
send an error message to go with its
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 17:08 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
On 6/1/2011 3:26 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:57 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
I like the built-in idea as I don't happen to use rsync via inetd/xinetd
or any other on-demand starter.
It's not an actual
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
--- Comment #4 from Brian K. White br...@aljex.com 2011-06-02 21:47:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #1)
That's very cute, but not quite what I had in mind.
I just attached a proof of concept patch that I surprised
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pollock andrew-samba-bugzi...@andrew.net.au
2011-06-03 03:56:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #1)
That's very cute, but not quite what I had in mind.
I just
I like the built-in idea as I don't happen to use rsync via inetd/xinetd
or any other on-demand starter.
It's not an actual problem for me, today, but that's no excuse to avoid
doing the right thing once you recognize it.
--
bkw
On 5/31/2011 1:15 AM, samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:57 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
I like the built-in idea as I don't happen to use rsync via inetd/xinetd
or any other on-demand starter.
It's not an actual problem for me, today, but that's no excuse to avoid
doing the right thing once you recognize it.
And the
On 6/1/2011 3:26 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:57 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
I like the built-in idea as I don't happen to use rsync via inetd/xinetd
or any other on-demand starter.
It's not an actual problem for me, today, but that's no excuse to avoid
doing the right
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pollock andrew-samba-bugzi...@andrew.net.au
2011-06-02 04:34:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 6513
-- https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6513
Proof of concept patch
This is purely a proof of concept patch and
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pollock andrew-samba-bugzi...@andrew.net.au
2011-06-02 04:36:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
That's very cute, but not quite what I had in mind.
I just attached a proof of concept patch that I surprised myself by
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8188
--- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison way...@samba.org 2011-05-31 05:15:51 UTC ---
You could just setup something to echo a one-line message on the socket and
disconnect. If you're using xinetd, tweak the program to be anything that
outputs a message
12 matches
Mail list logo
