[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-09-10 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-27 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 andras.porj...@ericsson.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-27 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #18 from andras.porj...@ericsson.com 2011-08-11 15:09:06 UTC --- I found something strange. (You can say it is another bug) So running rsync with a double dot arg /a/sourcedir/././dirtree/to/transfer will cause the sourcedir to be copied

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-27 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #19 from Wayne Davison way...@samba.org 2011-08-27 19:18:24 UTC --- Ouch, the dot dir was indeed coming from the current directory, not the relative path prefix. In my testing those 2 directories happened to have the same ownership and

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-10 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 andras.porj...@ericsson.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-10 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-09 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 andras.porj...@ericsson.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-09 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 andras.porj...@ericsson.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #6 from andras.porj...@ericsson.com 2011-08-08 10:29:54 UTC --- and also, using the /a/sourcedir/././something syntax and a non-existent /a/sourcedir will not work as planned. rsync will create /a/sourcedir, but instead of setting the

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #7 from Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net 2011-08-08 12:31:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) If I do rsync -R sub/foo sub/bar dest/, I could make the exact same argument that sub is not being sent,

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #9 from andras.porj...@ericsson.com 2011-08-08 15:09:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) I cannot imagine any use for avoiding attribute preservation on that particular directory. That's weird, because that

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #10 from Wayne Davison way...@samba.org 2011-08-08 15:20:39 UTC --- ./file2 dest.(In reply to comment #5) The created /a/sourcedir structure on the receiver side [...] it wont work on a There is no created a on the receiver side in

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #11 from Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net 2011-08-08 16:45:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) That's weird, because that has been the desired behavior in all the cases I have ever used the option. If I'm copying a particular

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 --- Comment #12 from Wayne Davison way...@samba.org 2011-08-08 17:00:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) how is /path/to/./foo/bar/ any less a specification of . than of ./foo ? Because the first /./ is spec'ed to be a separator for the

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-08-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-07-31 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Wayne Davison way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 8336] --implied-dirs should include the file-list root by default

2011-07-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336 Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|parent dir permission |--implied-dirs