-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
So I reported a bug to the bugzilla,
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10527. No one seems to have
commented on it or categorized it, so I'm wondering if there is
something else I should do to report the bug? Or are people just busy?
Not being on the list, I didn't see this earlier.
Terry said
John wrote:
Possibly rsync can use ssh to forward a local port chosen the same way ftp
chooses a port fo active ftp. Then local rsync opens a connexion to
127.0.0.1:port at the local end, and ssh forwards the stream to rsync
On 1 Jun 2004, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The jitterbug link on http://rsync.samba.org/nobugs.html no longer works. I
suggest it either be fixed or removed.
Thanks, fixed.
You make bug-reporting needlessly difficult, I think. I dislike the need to
subscribe to a mailing
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Martin Pool wrote:
On 1 Jun 2004, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The jitterbug link on http://rsync.samba.org/nobugs.html no longer works. I
suggest it either be fixed or removed.
Thanks, fixed.
You make bug-reporting needlessly difficult, I think. I
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, John wrote:
That may be so, but I don't think this is one of them. rsyncx is bound to have
all rsync's bugs. Qute possibly some will be fixed first there, and it may be
they will add valuable new features. One that I think would be nice is an
automatic retry: I keep
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Paul Haas wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, John wrote:
That may be so, but I don't think this is one of them. rsyncx is bound to have
all rsync's bugs. Qute possibly some will be fixed first there, and it may be
they will add valuable new features. One that I think would be
John wrote:
Possibly rsync can use ssh to forward a local port chosen the same way ftp
chooses a port fo active ftp. Then local rsync opens a connexion to
127.0.0.1:port at the local end, and ssh forwards the stream to rsync running
as a daemon (on another randomly-chosen port? a user-specified
is
not growing very quickly, and there are far fewer developers available
to work on it.
There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ignored
so Martin turned it off.
Yes, I did. I think the system was broken by some kind of
infrastructure migration, and since nobody seemed
: the code is
not growing very quickly, and there are far fewer developers available
to work on it.
There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ignored
so Martin turned it off.
Yes, I did. I think the system was broken by some kind of
infrastructure migration
Quoting Dave Dykstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Having a well-maintained FAQ would also be valuable, to keep the noise
put into the bug tracking system down.
Out of curiosity, and at the risk of going off-topic, are there
particular Web content-management frameworks for FAQs / knowledgebases
people
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
- misunderstandings of how to use rsync (operator error)
- massively incomplete reports (e.g. just it fails, without any
error message.)
- architectural limitations (e.g. upfront scan)
- other junk entries
Too many people fail to realize that
On 9 Dec 2002, R P Herrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really a better FAQ editor process seems more useful. Isn't
this the purpose of a CVS and commit privileges -- set up one
or more trusted editors with rights, and delegate that aspect.
Anybody who wants to maintain the FAQ-O-Matic
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:42:35PM -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Have you considered using bugzilla for reporting bugs? Just curious.
I was looking on the rsync website and didn't see much in bug
reporting.
There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ignored
so Martin
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:42:35PM -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Have you considered using bugzilla for reporting bugs? Just curious.
I was looking on the rsync website and didn't see much in bug
reporting.
There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ignored
so
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 03:39:18PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Just to look at what it might look like i extracted the BUGS
from NEWS and OLDNEWS to try formulating a list. The
biggest problem with it is that the bugs are described
according to the fix instead of the symptoms. I've attached
it
If the model works thats fine but people who don't want to be on the
mailing list it's a nice way to look things up. I don't want to add
more complexity by adding bug tracking if what people are using today
is fine with them.
I think where we are at; is that we are just waiting for a volunteer
Have you considered using bugzilla for reporting bugs? Just curious.
I was looking on the rsync website and didn't see much in bug
reporting.
sri
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart
17 matches
Mail list logo
