Re: Difference in behaviour with --backup

2003-02-28 Thread va_public [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If this isn't possible, perhaps because you want to have backup-dir on the src side, then I think your only alternative may be to perform your single-file copy as a recursive copy, using --exclude and --include arguments to narrow

Re: Difference in behaviour with --backup

2003-02-25 Thread Bennett Todd
Cc-ing this back to the rsync list. Vikas added some more info in an off-list mail to me, that straightened things out in my mind, pointing out that if the dst file is specified on the cmdline as a simple basename, because you've cd-ed to the target dir and are doing a pull, then rsync does just

Difference in behaviour with --backup

2003-02-24 Thread va_public [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I do rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/dir3 machine:/dir1/dir2/dir3 I get /dir1/dir2/Backup/dir3/... /Backup/dir3/dir4/... i.e. the tree under 'dir3' (my source tree) gets created under .../Backup. This is fine. But when I do the same thing

Re: Difference in behaviour with --backup

2003-02-24 Thread va_public [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], va_public [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I do rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/dir3 machine:/dir1/dir2/dir3 Sorry, yes, I did give the trailing '/' after my source dir name i.e. /dir1/dir2/dir3/ -- To unsubscribe