Re: Improved output (dry run)

2019-04-14 Thread Kevin Korb via rsync
Having dry-run not act like the same command without --dry-run would make less sense than people occasionally running it and discovering that they need more options. -v doesn't show things it didn't touch. So, it touched them for some reason. Without --itemize-changes you are left in the dark

Improved output (dry run)

2019-04-14 Thread darkdragon via rsync
Please improve (default) output for *--dry-run*. Specifically, it would be nice to imply *-v* since dry runs without displaying anything make no sense. Further (independently from dry run), it would be nice to have an option to hide directories which did *not* change. The need to *grep* results