Hi,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 06:39:53PM -0700, drsalists wrote:
>
> You could probably use CIFS, NFS or sshfs. ??It wouldn't be as fast, but the
> memory requirements should be less.
Sorry, I don't understand how to sync over NFS or sshfs without rsync. Can
you explain this please? I don't want
org Cc: Subject: Re:
Memory consumption for rsync -axv --delete
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:54:14AM +, John Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using rsync for many years and never had any kind of problem.
> Lately I am running out of RAM trying to do an incremental backup to a box
> th
Thank you.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 02:58:49AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You will have an old backup dir and a new backup dir. The new one
> will contain all the current stuff. The old one will contain what was
> current the last time you ran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You will have an old backup dir and a new backup dir. The new one
will contain all the current stuff. The old one will contain what was
current the last time you ran rsync. Just rm -rf the old one. Or
keep a few. Or a few dozen.
On 03/27/2016
Thanks I'll look this up. There is still the issue of how to get the target
box cleaned up since I can no longer run --delete.
/jl
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 02:49:02AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You miss-understand the purpose of --link-dest.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You miss-understand the purpose of --link-dest. Yes, it gives you
multiple complete backups, but each only consumes the disk space
needed to store files that are unique to that backup. Files that are
the same in 2 backup runs are actually the same
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:16:47AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:
> If you were using --link-dest to make multiple backups you wouldn't
> need --delete because the target is always a new empty directory (with
> - --link-dest pointing to the previous backup run).
The source is around 200G and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you were using --link-dest to make multiple backups you wouldn't
need --delete because the target is always a new empty directory (with
- --link-dest pointing to the previous backup run).
So, you get the benefit of having multiple backups to
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:54:14AM +, John Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using rsync for many years and never had any kind of problem.
> Lately I am running out of RAM trying to do an incremental backup to a box
> that only has 2G of RAM. The entire directory structure I'm mirroring is
>
On Fri 25 Mar 2016, John Long wrote:
>
> I have been using rsync for many years and never had any kind of problem.
> Lately I am running out of RAM trying to do an incremental backup to a box
> that only has 2G of RAM. The entire directory structure I'm mirroring is
> about 200G of files. A
Hi,
I have been using rsync for many years and never had any kind of problem.
Lately I am running out of RAM trying to do an incremental backup to a box
that only has 2G of RAM. The entire directory structure I'm mirroring is
about 200G of files. A minority of subdirectories have many files.
Is
11 matches
Mail list logo
