No problem
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, 18:05 raf via rsync wrote:
> raf via rsync wrote:
>
> > T. Shandelman via rsync wrote:
> >
> > > Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day.
> > >
> > > But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy.
> > >
> > > Under the
raf via rsync wrote:
> T. Shandelman via rsync wrote:
>
> > Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day.
> >
> > But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy.
> >
> > Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output
> > as
T. Shandelman via rsync wrote:
> Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day.
>
> But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy.
>
> Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output
> as without that flag.
>
> I cannot tell you
.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, T. Shandelman via rsync wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:26:41 -0500
From: T. Shandelman via rsync
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Question/comment about -n (dry run) flag of rsync
Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day
Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day.
But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy.
Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output
as without that flag.
I cannot tell you how many times I sit and scratch my head long and
