[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> consider, however, a slow pipe between systems, one or more mounting
> filesystems via nfs over a fast connection. the lan connection to
> the nfs is negligible versus the rsync connection from server to
> server.
Oh, I'd agree with that. But the
1,25451,25970), ".\n" '
"There are some who call me Tim?"
David Bolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@lists.samba.org on 09/25/2001 05:08:58 PM
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject: RE: Does RSYNC
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 07:08:58PM -0400, David Bolen wrote:
...
>
> To be honest, the only thing rsync offers over a straight copy over
> NFS is the recursive comparison of timestamp/size to determine files
> to copy. That might still be worth it, but you're definitely not
> going to get any b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> yes, but I recommend you add the -W option, unless it's likely that
> you have a lot data changing within the files and a slow pipe.
I wouldn't even put any caveat on it. Since rsync is going to have to
read the entire file anyway just to compute
yes, but I recommend you add the -W option, unless it's likely that you have a lot
data changing within the files and a slow pipe.
Tim Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D
Longmont, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect withi
Yes, but remember that the rsync protocol is optimized for low bandwidth
networks and high bandwidth "disks". When you go over NFS you are
increasing the access time for the "disks", and especially if you are
copying between two NFS mounts on the same machine you've got very high
bandwidth for t
Beautifully. That's how I have been backing up our NetApp filer.
Jacob
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:41:16PM -0700, Karl Kopper wrote:
>
> Does rsync work over an NFS mount?
>
> --Karl
>
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer
