RE: important caveat with Rsync on NT and dayligt savings time

2002-10-29 Thread wolfe-mcse
Howdy... Fortunately you posted the KB article number, and having read the article, I see you have a bit of a misunderstanding of what is going on. First off, NT/2000 uses a offset from GMT, which does not observe Daylight Savings Time (DST), for storing the time in the Event Log, and NTFS

RE: important caveat with Rsync on NT and dayligt savings time

2002-10-29 Thread bart . coninckx
No matter what my understanding's like: the timestamps on the files changed after last weekend, resulting in a mismatch between source and destination files. I've changed the clock to a timezone one hour ahead to compensate, did a F5 in a particular folder and miraculously the timestamps followed

Re: important caveat with Rsync on NT and dayligt savings time

2002-10-29 Thread jw schultz
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:06:26PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No matter what my understanding's like: the timestamps on the files changed after last weekend, resulting in a mismatch between source and destination files. I've changed the clock to a timezone one hour ahead to compensate,

Re: important caveat with Rsync on NT and dayligt savings time

2002-10-29 Thread Lachlan Cranswick
I think this day light savings time stamp issue also affects Win98 as well - at least on a Win98 PC I use. Rsync insists on updating all the files fully. Shouldn't it just be resetting the times on the files if the files are the same size - or am I missing something here? Lachlan. Your

RE: important caveat with Rsync on NT and dayligt savings time

2002-10-29 Thread wolfe-mcse
Howdy... The short answer is the DST issue affects volumes using the NTFS filesystem. The long answer is contained in the Windows KB article that was posted. I am looking at a solution for this problem, along with a few other issues, but the solution is a few months off from now. Wolfe --

Re: important caveat with Rsync on NT and dayligt savings time

2002-10-29 Thread bart . coninckx
If I understand the manpages correctly, if you use -t, the criterium for syncing files is the difference in timestamp, not in size. There are plenty of situations where the size of a file stays identical, while it's contents has changed. If you omit -t, all files are synced. Rgds, Bart

RE: important caveat with Rsync on NT and dayligt savings time

2002-10-29 Thread wolfe-mcse
Howdy... I have a printout of the manpage, and the -t states to transfer the modificaiton time along with the file. This is to place the same modication time on the file when it is transferred, rather than the current time. The easiest way to get around this issue is to use the -c or