Re: [Acl-Devel] mask ACL

2003-04-02 Thread Buck Huppmann
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:09:32PM -0500, Buck Huppmann wrote: yes, my bad. sorry. before i throw out more babies with the bathwater, though, anybody know if any other systems besides HP-UX and Solaris (for default ACLs, at least) require a MASK/CLASS_OBJ when there are no

Re: [Acl-Devel] mask ACL

2003-04-02 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
On Thursday 03 April 2003 05:26, Buck Huppmann wrote: On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:09:32PM -0500, Buck Huppmann wrote: yes, my bad. sorry. before i throw out more babies with the bathwater, though, anybody know if any other systems besides HP-UX and Solaris (for default ACLs, at least)

Re: [Acl-Devel] mask ACL

2003-04-01 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
Hello Eric, I am taking Buck and the rsync mailing list into the CC. Buck is the author of the rsync patch, he may know more on that problem. On Wednesday 02 April 2003 00:16, Eric Chen wrote: From my understanding, the effecive rights mask 'limits the effective rights granted to all groups

Re: [Acl-Devel] mask ACL

2003-04-01 Thread Buck Huppmann
yes, my bad. sorry. before i throw out more babies with the bathwater, though, anybody know if any other systems besides HP-UX and Solaris (for default ACLs, at least) require a MASK/CLASS_OBJ when there are no non-USER_OBJ/GROUP_OBJ/OTHER entries? thanks, Eric C., for finding this out -- To