On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
-f -s *.no_send -f -r *.no_delete -f - *.no_send+no_delete
I for one would be delighted to see this functionality in a
full release of rsync.
Hi Wayne,
I've just finally upgraded to rsync 2.6.4, and I saw that the
patch you made was
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
-f -s *.no_send -f -r *.no_delete -f - *.no_send+no_delete
Does that give any additional useful behaviour?
Sure. Having a rule be server-side only allows you to mark just some of
the rules with a --delete-excluded behavior and make it the
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:24:35PM +, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
Sure. Having a rule be server-side only allows you to mark just some of
the rules with a --delete-excluded behavior and make it the default when
--delete is specified.
I meant over and above what my patch did.
The
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:16:59PM +, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
-f -s *.no_send -f -r *.no_delete -f - *.no_send+no_delete
Does that give any additional useful behaviour?
Sure. Having a rule be server-side only allows you to mark just some of
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
The patch below adds a --ignore option to rsync, which means
--exclude-but-dont-delete-even-if-we-specified--delete-excluded.
Firstly, let me compliment you on the patch -- it was very complete.
(Aside: it helps to attach the patch instead of
