-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unfortunately rsync has no concept of newly created.
On 08/24/11 15:38, Saman Ghannadzadeh wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if it's possible to make the --delete option to not
delete files that have been newly created on the destination site but
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Kevin Korb wrote:
Unfortunately rsync has no concept of newly created.
--updateskip files that are newer on the receiver
doesn't prevent deleting for files not existing on source side?
On 08/24/11 15:38, Saman Ghannadzadeh wrote:
Hi all,
I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --update skips files that are newer on the target than the source. If
the file does not exist on the source then there is no concept of newer.
- --delete deletes things that are on the target but not the source (and
not excluded). It can't be
On 1/13/07, Tino Schöllhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rsync -v --delete --times /var/subversion/ myhost.de:backup/subversion/
The backup works fine - but file which are deleted from the source
*aren't* deleted from the destination as I expected.
You need the -r option (--recursive) to make
Hi,
thanks. Now it works. Of course you are right: Synching worked without
-r als long as I specified the files explicitly.
It would really help if the documentation would be updated and point out
that --delete works only with the -r option. As I can see there are a
lot of people out there
On 1/13/07, Tino Schöllhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would really help if the documentation would be updated and point out
that --delete works only with the -r option. As I can see there are a
lot of people out there who have problems with that option.
Version 2.6.7 and later of the man
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 02:14:39PM -0300, Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
if in the sender side server i delete a directory with files and
directories into it after run rsync is not removing that
directory/files on the receiver side.
I can only guess here since you don't supply any details of your run,
Sorry...i forgot the detailshere is the info...
im running:
rsync -vrplogDtzH --stats --delete-during --partial --timeout=500 --exclude-from=/root/rsyncexcludedfiles
--files-from=/root/rsyncincludedfiles..
and the includedfiles list have some wildecards but the files that has not
Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
rsync -vrplogDtzH --stats --delete-during --partial --timeout=500
--exclude-from=/root/rsyncexcludedfiles
--files-from=/root/rsyncincludedfiles..
and the includedfiles list have some wildecards but the files that has not
been deleted wasnt in the wildcard
Hi,
Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I had a free moment to work up a fix, and here it is. It was
pretty simple.
I'm sorry to wake this up again, but it seems not to be so simple to
fix at all :)
I've stumbled over this while noticing that the rsnapshot backup of my
root-filesystem
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
This is a different bug that was recently fixed: using --relative with
a root (/) filesystem and --delete was also failing to delete. The
latest CVS source and recent nightly tar files have this fixed. Here's
the bug (which has
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:57:51PM -0400, Lenny wrote:
rsync -a --delete --numeric-ids --relative --delete-excluded -v src/ dest/
The problem is caused by the source dir being src/ instead of src
when --relative is specified (this causes a problem internally because
the starting directory is
OK, I had a free moment to work up a fix, and here it is. It was
pretty simple.
..wayne..
--- flist.c 30 Mar 2005 17:31:35 - 1.291
+++ flist.c 27 Apr 2005 19:14:17 -
@@ -655,6 +655,9 @@ static struct file_struct *receive_file_
if (flags XMIT_TOP_DIR) {
On Fri 29 Oct 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a bit paranoid, but had to ask-- How safe is it to use the --delete option?
ie, when using it locally (or via a mounted network volume), will I
*ever* have to worry about my actual source files being delete
mistakenly (instead of dest.
thanks, that's what I wanted to hear (:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:22:16 +0200, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri 29 Oct 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a bit paranoid, but had to ask-- How safe is it to use the --delete option?
ie, when using it locally (or via a mounted
15 matches
Mail list logo
