On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:13:00AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
There can be several partials in the partial dir for the same file,
resulting from more than one interruption.
No, there is only one partial file. Don't confuse a partial file with a
temp file, which are different things in
Wayne Davison (way...@samba.org) wrote on 22 August 2009 09:15:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:13:00AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
There can be several partials in the partial dir for the same file,
resulting from more than one interruption.
No, there is only one partial file. Don't confuse
Carlos Carvalho (car...@fisica.ufpr.br) wrote on 17 July 2009 02:13:
Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 16 July 2009 20:59:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:48 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
What's the purpose of --partial-dir then? I thought it was leaving the
partial transfer as
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:48 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
What's the purpose of --partial-dir then? I thought it was leaving the
partial transfer as path/partial/filename instead of
path/.filename.random. That's what it tried to do but this isn't fine
if it needs another move. If rsync is
Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 16 July 2009 20:59:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:48 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
What's the purpose of --partial-dir then? I thought it was leaving the
partial transfer as path/partial/filename instead of
path/.filename.random. That's what it
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 17:01 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Here's a running instance caught by ps (lines broken for readibility):
rsync --perms --times --timeout=3600 --stats --no-motd -hh --force
--hard-links -ii --links --partial-dir=.~tmp~ --recursive --exclude
some excludes
Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 15 July 2009 18:50:
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 17:01 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Here's a running instance caught by ps (lines broken for readibility):
rsync --perms --times --timeout=3600 --stats --no-motd -hh --force
--hard-links -ii
