On 27-Feb-2009, at 21:16, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:20 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a
faster way
How much speed do u get to backup these files? Average?
I would thing that rsync 3.x would make a large difference on
lewis butler wrote:
On 27-Feb-2009, at 21:16, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:20 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a
faster way
How much speed do u get to backup these files? Average?
I would thing that rsync 3.x would make
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, lewis butler wrote:
On 27-Feb-2009, at 21:16, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:20 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a faster way
How much speed do u get to backup these files? Average?
I would thing
On Fri 27 Feb 2009, Mag Gam wrote:
I have to rsync 200k files which range in size from 5kb to 800kb. Is
there an optimal way to do this using rsync? or shall I use tar for
this?
Just do it, there's no reason why it shouldn't work.
Paul
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a faster way
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Paul Slootman paul+rs...@wurtel.net wrote:
On Fri 27 Feb 2009, Mag Gam wrote:
I have to rsync 200k files which range in size from 5kb to 800kb. Is
there an optimal way to do this using
1. On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:20 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a faster way
How much speed do u get to backup these files? Average?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Paul Slootman paul+rs...@wurtel.net wrote:
On Fri 27 Feb 2009, Mag
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Mag Gam magaw...@gmail.com wrote:
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a faster way
http://rob.sun3.org/misc/parallelizing-rsync-processes/
--
RPM
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To
