Hi Carson,
Do you have any update on this?
Thanks,
Nitin
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You could folllow the detailed instructions from Mike Bombich at
http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html
I am a beginner and the instructions are so clear that I was able to
get the job done.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or
it you have to rename it again, if
you
use solution 1... which can be a pain in the neck.
--Rob
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote:
is rsync --version reporting the wrong version number, or am I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did
it you have to rename it again, if
you
use solution 1... which can be a pain in the neck.
--Rob
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote:
is rsync --version reporting the wrong version number, or am I
to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did
+0100, Kurt wrote:
is rsync --version reporting the wrong version number, or am
I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did:
download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra
patches
folder?)
in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install
--version reporting the wrong version number, or am I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did:
download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches
folder?)
in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install
--version reporting the wrong version number, or am I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did:
download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches
folder?)
in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install
://connect.homeunix.com/lbackup/developer/rsync_hfs
Hope this helps.
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote:
is rsync --version reporting the wrong version number, or am I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did:
download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why
Hi -
is rsync --version reporting the wrong version number, or am I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did:
download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches
folder?)
in Terminal I ran: ./configure, make, sudo make install
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote:
is rsync --version reporting the wrong version number, or am I to
stupid to properly install rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac?
Here is what I did:
download and extract rsync-3-0-5 (btw: why is there an extra patches
folder?)
in Terminal I ran
, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Eberhard Moenkeberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Madhavan Chari wrote:
We want to use the rsync 3 for incremental file transfer of our File
system
from one box to another, however there are about a million files
to be copied, so just wanted to know
Hi Everyone,
We want to use the rsync 3 for incremental file transfer of our File system
from one box to another, however there are about a million files
to be copied, so just wanted to know by any one of your's previous
experience with rsync 3, will these many files get copied at first time
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:44:06 +0530, madhavanchari wrote:
We want to use the rsync 3 for incremental file transfer of our File system
from one box to another, however there are about a million files
to be copied, so just wanted to know by any one of your's previous
experience with rsync 3
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Madhavan Chari wrote:
We want to use the rsync 3 for incremental file transfer of our File system
from one box to another, however there are about a million files
to be copied, so just wanted to know by any one of your's previous
experience with rsync 3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5505
Summary: rsync 3.x reporting excluded files as error
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5505
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
So,
It might be a little late to rock this boat, but I just was turned on
to rsync 3.
So, Apple's changes to rsync to support metadata has -E as:
-E --extended-attributes copy extended attributes,
resource forks
This was done in OS X 10.4, in April of 2005.
It looks like
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:23:16PM +, Josh Durham wrote:
It looks like rsync 3 though is moving -E to -X, and changing what -E does:
Rsync has used the -X option for xattr data in the patches since the
beginning. The xattrs.diff first appeared in the patches dir in mid
2005, but existed
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:18:59AM +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Easy to understand and fix (after 3 minutes inside a debugger):
Much appreciated! Thanks for the patch. I've checked in the fix.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
$ ./rsync distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.Fr::
Erreur de segmentation
Easy to understand and fix (after 3 minutes inside a debugger):
Index: socket.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/socket.c,v
retrieving revision 1.130
diff -u -b -B -w -p
Hello,
As soon as I find a little time I will try to manually apply Apple's
extended attributes patches (that apply to the 2.6.3 version) to the
trunk rsync 3. I say manually as I already noticed some differences
that would make a patch impossible.
There is a clash with the -E option
Looking at the current code in CVS, it appears that rsync does not
currently support ACLs or XATTRs for Solaris ZFS filesystems (at least
not completely - I'm not sure how UFS/ZFS auto ACL format conversion
works). It shouldn't be too hard to add support, especially as ZFS now
uses NFSv4 ACLs.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:58:38AM -0700, Carson Gaspar wrote:
Looking at the current code in CVS, it appears that rsync does not
currently support ACLs or XATTRs for Solaris ZFS filesystems
Does Solaris 10 not use posix ACLs and xattrs? I've only tested rsync
on solaris 8 and 9 (some time
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:58:38AM -0700, Carson Gaspar wrote:
Looking at the current code in CVS, it appears that rsync does not
currently support ACLs or XATTRs for Solaris ZFS filesystems
Does Solaris 10 not use posix ACLs and xattrs? I've only tested rsync
on solaris
just fyi, with help from the YODL-ers (thanks Frank Karel!), here's
what _works_ for me with to build the
icmake-v700
yodl-v204
prereqs to rsync3 on osx 10.4.87.
# ICMAKE #
cd /path/to
rm -rf icmake*
wget
was visiting Dublin and
he mentioned there had been some thinking about an rsync 3. One
feature being considered was allowing users to supply arbitrary rules
for what to do when a file is missing, based on file suffix etc. Did
anyone follow up these ideas?
John
26 matches
Mail list logo
