Ah yes, I recall thinking that your patch should go in, but I thereafter
forgot about it. I've gone ahead and committed your change since it was
very simple and similar to what we used to do in 2.5.5, only with a
better heuristic. I'm planning to look into Thorild Selen's patch as--text
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:29:58PM +0200, Thorild Selen wrote:
It's not enough just checking the last char to see whether something
is an address: [...]
Yeah, good point. I've checked in an improved version of the test based
on your suggestions (which I finally got around to looking at in
Wayne Davison writes:
My patch leaves out the IPv6 logic if INET6 is not configured into rsync.
Sounds reasonable.
I've checked-in the appended patch. See if you like it.
Looks good to me. I'll report to the Debian bug tracking system that
these issues are now fixed in CVS upstream.
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:07:02PM -0500, John Van Essen wrote:
I had submitted a similar bug report and small patch on April 10:
There were no followups to it at the time.
Ah yes, I recall thinking that your patch should go in, but I thereafter
forgot about it. I've gone ahead and committed
Greetings,
As previously reported by me to the Debian bug tracking system:
--
An access list in rsyncd.conf may contain hostnames as well as
addresses. It may contain several patterns to match against.
address_match (in
Sorry, I missed that an address should be able to contain a slash
(used with netmask) and a % and some more stuff too if it's a scoped
IPv6 address. Here's a new patch.
Thorild Selén
Datorföreningen Update / Update Computer Club, Uppsala, SE
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Thorild Selen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
As previously reported by me to the Debian bug tracking system:
--
An access list in rsyncd.conf may contain hostnames as well as
addresses. It may contain
