Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-23 Thread devzero
for comparison. this will use much cpu, though regards roland -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: 23.09.07 04:11:43 An: Kenneth Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: rsync@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: compression of source and target files On 9/21/07

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-23 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 9/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i can transfer remote files to a local dir and they are being compressed on the local side Good, so it basically works. +Use of --dest-filter automatically enables --whole-file. I suppose the patch could be changed to allow delta

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-23 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:10:18PM -0700, Kenneth Simpson wrote: Sorry, I neglected to mention the source is uncompressed but we need to compress the target file because we're running out of disk space and the files are highly compressible. The BackupPC program has the ability to store files

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-23 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:34:30AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: On 9/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i tried --checksum but it didn`t work as expected. In a future release (probably one past 3.0.0) I'm hoping to add a DB accessing protocol that will allow quite a few extended

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-22 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Kenneth Simpson wrote: Chuck Wolber wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Kenneth Simpson wrote: Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync still work correctly? It'll still work

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-22 Thread roland
- From: Kenneth Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: rsync@lists.samba.org Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:24 PM Subject: compression of source and target files Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-22 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 9/21/07, Kenneth Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I neglected to mention the source is uncompressed but we need to compress the target file because we're running out of disk space and the files are highly compressible. You might try the experimental patch

compression of source and target files

2007-09-21 Thread Kenneth Simpson
Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync still work correctly? Any help would be appreciated. -- Ken -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting,

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-21 Thread Kenneth Simpson
Chuck Wolber wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Kenneth Simpson wrote: Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync still work correctly? It'll still work correctly, but compressing a compressed

Re: compression of source and target files

2007-09-21 Thread Chuck Wolber
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Kenneth Simpson wrote: Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync still work correctly? It'll still work correctly, but compressing a compressed file can actually make it