You da boss.
And thanks for looking into this, it'll save other folks heartache in
the future.
Scott
Dave Dykstra wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:11:40PM -0400, pyxl wrote:
>
>>Well,
>>
>>Looking at the source for 2.5.5, I'm only seeing mention of it under the
>>--numeric-ids flag in rsyn
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:11:40PM -0400, pyxl wrote:
> Well,
>
> Looking at the source for 2.5.5, I'm only seeing mention of it under the
> --numeric-ids flag in rsync(1); --owner doesn't make mention of it at all.
> What you quoted must be in CVS (I'd look, but I don't know how to do a
> remot
Well,
Looking at the source for 2.5.5, I'm only seeing mention of it under the --numeric-ids
flag in rsync(1); --owner doesn't make mention of it at all. What you quoted must be
in CVS (I'd look, but I don't know how to do a remote CVS checkout yet, and am too
lazy to learn at this moment).
Her
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:24:20PM -0400, pyxl wrote:
> Well, it's definitely not in either of the man pages - and those should
> be the canonical documentation of rsync's behavior. But it's a small
> bug (with big teeth!).
>
> Corey Stup wrote:
>
> > pyxl wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Tr
Well, it's definitely not in either of the man pages - and those should
be the canonical documentation of rsync's behavior. But it's a small
bug (with big teeth!).
Corey Stup wrote:
> pyxl wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Tripped over a documentation bug. I'm guessing the behavior I've
>> found is
pyxl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Tripped over a documentation bug. I'm guessing the behavior I've found
> isn't a bug in itself as it's kind of implied by chroot (unless the
> /etc/passwd db is read *before* you do the chroot call), so I'm calling
> it a documentation bug.
I pointed out the same th
