On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:32:23PM -0500, A.Weston wrote:
include.txt contains:
+ /local/bin/
+ /local/etc/
- *
That trailing exclusion is too all-encompassing. Try this instead:
+ /local/bin/
+ /local/etc/
- /local/*
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
this my scenario:
all commands are local
rsync -a file1 file2
cp -l file2 file3
chown some_other_existing_user:group file1
rsync -a file1 file2
now file2 and file3 are both hard links and
permissions are shared in both, versus rsync creating
new file2.
Desired behavior is to create new file if
go on file size?
The archive in question is a several hundred GB linux distro archive so I'd
rather not have to redownload it :)
Cheers,
Mark.
- --
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ Trusted Information Management
Trusted Solutions and Services group
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED
other than the timestamp being different.
If rsync is used with -a, the timestamps _shouldn't_ be different.
If I use -av -I, will it ignore the timestamps and only go on file size?
Yes.
The archive in question is a several hundred GB linux distro archive so I'd
rather not have
, will it ignore the timestamps and only go on file size?
Yes.
Ok I'll try using that
The archive in question is a several hundred GB linux distro archive so
I'd rather not have to redownload it :)
Oops...
I tried to move a local Debian mirror (with daily snapshots that has
unchanged files
uld behave in terms of ctime file
attribute. Or could this problem be nfs/kernel issue or something else
? Does rsync change ctime for all files under the same directory
trees ?
Thanks in advance,
yasushi
Original Message
Subject:
question for file attribu
Sorry again, one more thing.
We tested rsync with -a/-t option, but it does not save ctime file
attribute.
Original Message
Subject:
[Fwd: question for file attributes (atime, ctime)]
Date:
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:17:15 -0400
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:17:15AM -0400, Yasushi Okubo wrote:
What we are having problem is that when rsync gets kicked off and
transfers one file to the destination, this action changes ctime of
all files in the same directory and sub directories on the
destination side
Rsync only preserves
Hi,
I looked though documentation and also checked last 9 months of
archives, but could not find the corresponding information. We are
having an issue with incremental backup with arkeia. Arkeia checks if
ctime/mtime of the file are changed, if so, it backs up.
I realized that when I ran
Title: Environment variable question
Hi,
I'm trying to run a command as follows:
rsync -Lcav temp.txt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:\$DATESPATH/dat
The above returns the following err:
mkstemp /dat/.temp.txt.oYaO9U failed: No such file or directory
$DATESPATH is a variable defined in 'datauser's
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
If I then run it again, I get the following [a different hashed file]
I didn't see that in my just-run test. I did notice a problem with the
code not removing an existing destination file prior to trying to hard
link a hashed file
One thing that the link-by-hash patch needs is an additional close();
without that, I quickly ran into too many open files.
--- hashlink.c.old 2004-09-24 10:59:12.0 +0200
+++ hashlink.c 2004-09-24 10:59:20.0 +0200
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@
}
The --link-by-hash patch is a bit defective, I think.
If I run the following command:
rsync --link-by-hash=/tmp/hash 192.168.1.1::mirrors/ps1 /tmp
I get the following output:
(1) linkname = /tmp/hash/0fb9ca1a/3cc6ec7f5a2de3a0235b585f/0
link-by-hash (new): /tmp/ps1 -
On Wed 22 Sep 2004, Erik Jan Tromp wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:21:31 +0200
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had hoped to use it both for my rotating backups for my (unofficial)
slackware mirror.
Hmmm... For a slackware mirror I expect that it would be fine.
To my eyes,
On Wed 22 Sep 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:54:32AM -0400, Erik Jan Tromp wrote:
Are there plans to make --link-by-hash pay attention to file externals?
The issue has come up before:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-February/008630.html
I don't know of
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 04:14:27PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 22 Sep 2004, Erik Jan Tromp wrote:
rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/unpacked/rsync/patches/link-by-hash.diff
Unfortunately that seems to have tabs expanded, and at one point a
line was wrapped.
The unpacked files are taken
:07 orig+owner.group
-rw-r--r-- 5 erik users 395 2004-09-14 17:07 orig+time
(The 5th link being the hash file itself)
My question is simple enough. Are there plans to make --link-by-hash pay attention to
file externals?
Erik
--
Registered Linux User Number 140066
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin
On Wed 22 Sep 2004, Erik Jan Tromp wrote:
I had noticed the --link-by-hash patch a short while back decided it was time to
experiment with it. Sadly, its behaviour is considerabely different from what I
expected - to the point that I find it unusable in its current form. I had hoped to
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:21:31 +0200
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had hoped to use it both for my rotating backups for my (unofficial)
slackware mirror.
Hmmm... For a slackware mirror I expect that it would be fine.
To my eyes, a mirror implies a duplicate fileset
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:54:32AM -0400, Erik Jan Tromp wrote:
Are there plans to make --link-by-hash pay attention to file externals?
The issue has come up before:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-February/008630.html
I don't know of any plans for changing the --link-by-hash patch,
On Fri 10 Sep 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
As indicated in the rsyncd.conf man page, the command should be this:
rsync stream tcp nowait publish /usr/bin/rsync rsyncd --daemon
Ah, I searched the rsync man page for 'inetd' and didn't find
anything... As it's about usage of rsync,
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 12:21:43PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Ah, I searched the rsync man page for 'inetd' and didn't find
anything...
The --daemon option mentions inetd, and its text tells you to read the
rsyncd.conf manpage for more details. I think having the daemon-mode
specific details
at the same time, which also is spawned by
inetd, and works, so that should not be the option?
Using rsync as standalone daemon works fine with the same settings, so my
question is:
is there an issue with rsync being called by inetd or are we missing
something?
I would be grateful for some help
On Fri 10 Sep 2004, Kick Claus wrote:
we would like to use rsync (2.6.2 manualy patched and recompiled) in daemon
mode spawned by inetd (Solaris 5.8 Environment).
Hmm, I don't know whether this is supported...
rsync stream tcp nowait publish /usr/bin/rsync rsyncd --daemon --port 1234 .
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:35:30 +0200
From: Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Paul,
we would like to use rsync (2.6.2 manualy patched and recompiled) in
daemon
mode spawned by inetd (Solaris 5.8 Environment).
Hmm, I don't know whether this is supported...
Hm, then lets simply wait for
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:05:37PM +0200, Kick Claus wrote:
rsync stream tcp nowait publish /usr/bin/rsync rsyncd --daemon --port 1234 .
As indicated in the rsyncd.conf man page, the command should be this:
rsync stream tcp nowait publish /usr/bin/rsync rsyncd --daemon
(I changed
only got around 100K files, you'll be fine (does not calculate
for me though, 1TB and 100K files - they should be 10MB each, not exactly very small
:) ).
- Original Message -
From: Sai Nanduru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, August 22, 2004 6:50 pm
Subject: Question about
Hi there,
I would like to ask a quick question to the experts on
this mailing list. If it has already been answered
please pardon me (and point me to the location where I
can view the answer).
I have a need to setup a mirror for an NFS file system
exported from a NetApp Filer device (based on BSD
not calculate
for me though, 1TB and 100K files - they should be 10MB each, not exactly very small
:) ).
- Original Message -
From: Sai Nanduru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, August 22, 2004 6:50 pm
Subject: Question about suitability of rsync utility
Hi there,
I would like to ask
I'm am currently setting up a simple backup system using rsync. I am
backing up users home directories to a central backup machine, and then
exporting those backups via NFS back to their host machines.
I had this set up and working under Linux (kernel 2.4.21) but have since
decided to give Mac OS
Chris Heller writes:
I ran into a problem today when I tested the system for the first time.
I am rsyncing from a remote Linux host using the following options to
rsync: -avv --rsh=ssh stuff here --exclude-from=path to exclude
file --delete.
The problem is when the files are moved over to
Is there a way to get rsync to estimate the net change of disk space usage
for a transfer? I can get the gross amount of files to be transferred using
--stats, and if I use -v I can see a list of files to be deleted. But
then I'd have to mangle the filenames to the target path (prepend some
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:01:39AM -0600, Brashers, Bart -- MFG, Inc. wrote:
If it's easy, maybe this would be a good addition to rsync --stats. List
the size of the files deleted, and perhaps the net change in disk usage.
Yes, an addition like that sounds like a good idea to me. It will
-
From: Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Guo jing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: A question about connection refused
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:01:41PM +, Guo jing wrote:
I install rsync in computer and run it as a daemon
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: A question about connection refused
I install rsync in computer and run it as a daemon successfully, but when
I
run rsync command on another end to connect it. There is a error.
The output is :
opening tcp connection
I install rsync in computer and run it as a daemon successfully, but when I
run rsync command on another end to connect it. There is a error.
The output is :
opening tcp connection to 192.168.0.43 port 873
rsync: failed to connect to 192.168.0.43: Connection refused
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:01:41PM +, Guo jing wrote:
rsync: failed to connect to 192.168.0.43: Connection refused
Did you start an rsync daemon on 192.168.0.43? If not, there is nothing
there to receive the connection. Perhaps you meant to use a single
colon instead of a double
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Matt Vorwald wrote:
(60) SendBuffer: Error fd = 95 peer socket closed
This is not a message from rsync, so you'll have to look elsewhere. A
quick google search indicates that it might have come from a special
Novell-modified rsync for Netware, so you
I have 2 servers. Both have my home directory on a common file server mounted as
/home/wally. I have 2.6.2 in my home directory in
/home/wally/rsync/rsync-2.6.2 and I am doing a push from one file server to another.
My command line has /home/wally/rsync/rsync-2.6.2/rsync as its command. I have
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:22:45AM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
Could it be simply using rsync and using an older rsync that
happens to be installed and in the path??
That's the normal case if you don't use the --rsync-path=/PATH/rsync
option to tell rsync what program to run. It is easy to
: Re: question
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:22:45AM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
Could it be simply using rsync and using an older rsync that
happens to be installed and in the path??
That's the normal case if you don't use the --rsync-path=/PATH/rsync
option to tell rsync what program to run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
i looked in google , faq etc but didnt found a answer.
sorry if i overseen something.
how i can auth. via a hostkey without make a config in ~/.ssh
normaly ssh has support with ssh -i /keyfile is there any way to combine it
via rsync , with
rsync -e ssh -i key ..etc
Thanks for your answer!
Yes,my question is that if we can get a good result when the file is
changing while it is being copied by rsync
In my test, if the file is being augmented while it been copied using
rsync.I can get a normal copy on the other end and the result file is the
same as what
On 7 Jun 2004, Guo jing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your answer!
Yes,my question is that if we can get a good result when the file is
changing while it is being copied by rsync
In my test, if the file is being augmented while it been copied using
rsync.I can get a normal copy
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:47:47AM +, Guo jing wrote:
As you said, if the source file reduced and the blocks were occupied by
other files there will be a file with other file's content and a abnormal
end on the other end.
No, the OS doesn't work that way. Rsync will instead copy lots of
hello
i looked in google , faq etc but didnt found a answer.
sorry if i overseen something.
how i can auth. via a hostkey without make a config in ~/.ssh
normaly ssh has support with ssh -i /keyfile is there any way to combine it
via rsync , with
rsync -e ssh -i key ..etc etc does not work
thx
I had this problem trying to script an unattended backup. (rsync 2.6.1
on cygwin)
I found that if you need to pass command line arguments to ssh you need
to use:
rsync --rsh=ssh -i key
Using -e, if I remember it correctly, just tries to execute a command
called ssh -i key which, obviously,
rsync -e ssh -i key ..etc etc does not work
The best thing you can do is to use -vv to see what command rsync is
running and then try a similar command (e.g. use rsync --help instead
of the server command) to see what is going wrong with your ssh setup.
Also, avoid a path that requires
hello
a.) ssh with key alone works fine (ssh -i key host command)
b.) i try too the method like from braunsdorf (write e shells cript with
ssh commands then rsync -e script)
maybe i just to stupid for the rsync commands here what i need or ?
rsync -e scriptname (content of script)
in scripts
ssh
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 09:58:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rsync -e scriptname (content of script)
in scripts
ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa /home/mysql host:/usr/src
This is very hard to decypher, but it looks like you may have put rsync
options in your ssh script. Also, don't use '~' -- it
On 31 May 2004, Guo jing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I am a student in China.I like the linux and usually use the rsync to
backup my documents. Last week when I use it,I find a question I want to
discuss with you.
The condition is like this: The source file that I want to rsync
hello,
I am a student in China.I like the linux and usually use the rsync to
backup my documents. Last week when I use it,I find a question I want to
discuss with you.
The condition is like this: The source file that I want to rsync to
another computer is 129M before I start the rsync
On Mon 24 May 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
output. Finally, I applied a modified version of the patch that Paul
just reminded us that Debian is using, though I decided to limit the
write size to bwlimit * 512 rather than bwlimit * 100 (at least for
now, but feel free to argue that a different
On Fri 21 May 2004, Wallace Matthews wrote:
Since --bwlimit depends upon sleep(1 second), I repeated the experiment with a file
that was 383 Megabyte so that when I am running unthrottled it takes significantly
longer than a second (ie. ~50 seconds) to complete. I get the same bi-modal
On Fri 21 May 2004, Markus Gaugusch wrote:
Imagine this happenings:
10:00: file a.txt gets uploaded to ftp server
10:01: file a.txt is rsynced to samba server
10:02: file a.txt gets deleted from samba server (after rsync run)
10:03: file would again be synced :(
Now I think that I need a
On Mon 17 May 2004, Greger Cronquist wrote:
I'm wondering if the following is rsync-related or an issue with my
supposedly synchronous internet connection:
I have a server running an rsync daemon. When I simultaneously pull and
push files to this server using two separate processes on
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 17 May 2004, Greger Cronquist wrote:
I'm wondering if the following is rsync-related or an issue with my
supposedly synchronous internet connection:
I have a server running an rsync daemon. When I simultaneously pull and
push files to this server using two
I agree with Paul. It's almost certainly hour WAN link. My own at home
often gives sustained downloads in excess of 2Mbps, This seems to be
throttled by the cube of the difference between upload speed and 16kbps.
When I get up to 10kbps up, it's still useable. At 12, it's like a 21,400
I think this would be an excellent addition to rsync and could find many
applications for it myself. However like Markus I haven't the time or
the programing knowledge to make it myself.
just wanted to get my two cents worth in,
Matt
Markus Gaugusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/21/04 04:10PM
Hi,
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
I can repeat this time after time. If --bwlimit is 4000 (ie. 4005,
4025, 4050,5000,7500,1,10) real is in the same range as 4001.
If --bwlimit is 4000 or under (ie. 3725, 2000, 1000, 100) real is in
the same range as
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:54:42PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
I'm looking into some of the old bwlimit patches to see about
improving this.
Here's a potential patch to make --bwlimit better. This started with
Roger's idea on accumulating delay until we have enough to make a sleep
call without
I am doing some benchmarking of rsync. I am using the --bwlimit= option to throttle
down rsync to predict its operation over slow communications links. I am using rsync
2.6.2 from the release site without any patches. I downloaded the release rather than
pull from the CVS tree.
I have 2
Since --bwlimit depends upon sleep(1 second), I repeated the experiment with a file
that was 383 Megabyte so that when I am running unthrottled it takes significantly
longer than a second (ie. ~50 seconds) to complete. I get the same bi-modal behavior
but with different values for 4000 and 4001
Hi,
I need to solve a specific problem and I think that I need an extension to
rsync for this to work :)
I have an FTP server in the DMZ and a samba server in my intranet. The ftp
server has an incoming directory, where people can put uploads and it is
also running rsync in daemon mode.
The
Hi:
I really want to know how rsync works.
Once it synchronize a file. Does rscync first create a temporary in the
remote machine first and then rename it? Or it direct write the difference
into the dest-file?
Could you please tell me what will happen to the dest-file when a rsync
process
That is it. The destination file is unaffected until rsync completes its
replacement, then the directory entry is repointed at the new file and the
reference to the old inode freed.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once synchronize a file. Does rscync first create a temporary in the
remote machine first and then rename it? Or it direct write the difference
into the dest-file?
Could you please tell me what will happen to the dest-file when a rsync
process interrupted by some problems(network problem
Hi all,
I'm wondering if the following is rsync-related or an issue with my
supposedly synchronous internet connection:
I have a server running an rsync daemon. When I simultaneously pull and
push files to this server using two separate processes on the client
(different directories), I get
Hi all,
I'm wanting to make weekly backups of host qin to host elijah. I set a
crontab to run a script that effectually executes this rsync command:
rsync -ave ssh --exclude-from=excludes.txt --delete /
elijah:/home/backup/qin
host qin is running gentoo linux with rsync version 2.5.6.
host
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gianluca gattelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/31/2004 05:34 AM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Timeout question
Hi.
I've got 2 Fedora Linux (a Master and a Slave) with RSYNC-2.5.7. I need to
keep Master
Hi.
I've got 2 Fedora Linux (a Master and a Slave) with RSYNC-2.5.7. I need to keep Master synchronized
every 5 minutes (mounting a remote directory with NFS on Slave).
It runs correctly.
To simulate a problem, I try to disconnect the lan cable.
From the shell of Slave:
rsync -a -v
Hi,
It would have been a simple script with the extension I proposed
(create batch without patching,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09757.html).
Alternatively, you can use librsync's rdiff. That lets you can save the
patch information to a file and then transmit it only if it's
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:59:41PM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
It would have been a simple script with the extension I proposed
(create batch without patching,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09757.html).
Fwiw, I think adding this extension is a good idea.
--
Jos Backus
hi,
So I have two machines that rsync over an ADSL network. This works fine,
except on certain times when we get too much new data. They it takes
far too long to backup this way.
What I would like to do is have the output from rsync go to a USB drive,
so I can just take to the backup server
suggested, or it
could be a network-related issue if one or both of the machines in question
is a Windows box.
Jim Salter
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hello,
I have more info on my specific problem.
pop 1) RedHat 7.3, fs1 fs3
pop 2) BSD/OS 4.3.1 www files
rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27
fs1 -- fs3 500kB/s
fs1 -- fs3 420kB/s
fs1 -- www20kB/s
fs1 -- www20kB/s
files -- www 2.9 MB/s
files -- www 4,4 Mb/s
Hello,
I seem to be having a performance problem with rsync.
I have done some testing of rsync and ftp. If I do
a transfer (either way) with ftp, I get about 500 Kbytes/sec.
Using rsync to do the same transfer (either way) I only get
about 50 Kbytes/sec. I am only testing straight file
copies.
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:05:25PM -0500, Rick Frerichs wrote:
Hello,
I seem to be having a performance problem with rsync.
I have done some testing of rsync and ftp. If I do
a transfer (either way) with ftp, I get about 500 Kbytes/sec.
Using rsync to do the same transfer (either way) I
Hello
Regarding ownership on the destination:
rsync's man page indicates that when synchronizing files to a remote host,
-o implies the --numeric-ids option, which makes perfect sense aince the
named users/groups may not exist on the destination host. The problem I
have is that the files
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 01:19:06PM -0500, acct svcs wrote:
The problem I have is that the files created on the destination still
appear to be owned by the local user (server1) on the rsync server.
Which is the user you told rsync to run as. If you want any other
user(s) to own the files, you
PROTECTED]
To: acct svcs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about file ownership on destination
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:05:41 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from binome.blorf.net ([216.228.9.89]) by mc12-f8.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 29 Dec
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 05:23:21PM -0500, acct svcs wrote:
AFAIK, the daemon is running as root.
Quoting from the rsyncd.conf file you cited:
uid = server1
gid = server1
Comment-out these lines.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 03:26:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 05:23:21PM -0500, acct svcs wrote:
AFAIK, the daemon is running as root.
Quoting from the rsyncd.conf file you cited:
uid = server1
gid = server1
Comment-out these lines.
He is also
it should be reasonably secure.
Thanks for helping out Wayne.
joe
From: Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: acct svcs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about file ownership on destination
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:26:53 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from
I'm not sure how that could be considered a security issue on rsync's
part - if rsync wasn't running as root, how would it be able to set uid
and gid arbitrarily?
acct svcs wrote:
After your suggestion I did discover a solution, though. I had to
explicitly assign uid and gid to root in
Hello everyone I just found out this great tool. I need to use it to get access to
DSBL zones. in their website it says
Can I run my own DSBL DNS secondary?
DSBL provides direct rsync access to our zones. To retrieve one of the zones, install
rsync and run the following command:
rsync
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 04:15:00PM +0200, Serhan T?RKMENLER wrote:
when I run #rsync -t rsync.dsbl.org::dsbl/rbldns-list.dsbl.org
will I download this file ? I can view the directory but I cant
download? What am I doing wrong?
You left off the trailing . arg to tell it where to put the copy.
Corey McGuire wrote:
Would something like find -type d -exec rsync {}/* server::mod/{}/. \; work
for you?
At least, something elong those lines...
Correct me whilst Im probably wrong... but it touches one of those
questions I lowly sysadmin ponder about: would rsyncing on a per file
you have to
(a) reduce the transfer frequency, and (b) resign yourself
to have your i/o subsystem running flat out *all the time*.
Also, with the monilithic scan, the filesystem can easily
change between the scan being done, and the actual directory/file
in question being copied. Might
deletes. Or maybe the better approach would be to
invest in a real cluster filesystem.
Also, with the monilithic scan, the filesystem can easily
change between the scan being done, and the actual directory/file
in question being copied. Might it not be better all round
to walk the tree
Would something like find -type d -exec rsync {}/* server::mod/{}/. \; work
for you?
At least, something elong those lines...
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:21:34PM -0500, Chao,Eisen R. wrote:
Hi All:
I thought the default behaviour for Rsync was that it would only
overwrite
destination files that have a lesser date than the source file. Instead
No. Rsync _replaces_ the destination file. And if --times
is enabled
Hi All:
I thought the default behaviour for Rsync was that it would only
overwrite
destination files that have a lesser date than the source file. Instead
I
have this:
Source
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[/csapps115/IBMHTTPD/content-external/cna/html/meet]: ls -al meet.html
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:16:11PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote:
I know this subject has been discussed time and time again, but
everytime I think I've figured it out, I get stuck again.
Here is the file structure, root is /:
/var
/etc
/otherdir1
/otherdir2
I want to rsync the following:
Hi,
I have a Maildir store (about 500 GB) on a linux
(redhat 8) server which I am trying to mirror to
another identical server. I have 4 GB of ram on both
machines. I am using rsync 2.5.5. At present the
machines are on the same lan (100Mbit).
Everytime I run the rsync, it runs for a short
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 06:42:17AM -0700, Zachary Denison wrote:
Hi,
I have a Maildir store (about 500 GB) on a linux
(redhat 8) server which I am trying to mirror to
another identical server. I have 4 GB of ram on both
machines. I am using rsync 2.5.5. At present the
machines are on
Hi Wayne...
OK, it works now.
So, would it be correct to say that the source is the path of the --include-from
file?
Thanks again,
Loris
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:43:44PM +0100, Loris Serena wrote:
The command was actually split on two lines by the mailer! ;-(
I
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:00:32AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
/tmp/rsync-include-file:
+ /testrsync1/
+ /testrsync2/
+ /testrsync3/
- /*/
Oops, that last line should have just been this:
- /*
... without the trailing slash.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
To: Max Kipness
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question on --include-from option.
Hi Max!
Done that, still no joy... ;-((
ppukweb2% more rsync-include-file
/tmp/loris/testrsync1/
/tmp/loris/testrsync2/
/tmp
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:43:44PM +0100, Loris Serena wrote:
The command was actually split on two lines by the mailer! ;-(
I know, that still doesn't give you a destination since the
--include-from option is just a filter on the source. If the
ppukweb8:/tmp/loris is your actual destination,
301 - 400 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
