On 9 Dec 2002, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really a better FAQ editor process seems more useful. Isn't
> this the purpose of a CVS and commit privileges -- set up one
> or more trusted editors with rights, and delegate that aspect.
Anybody who wants to maintain the FAQ-O-Matic al
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> - misunderstandings of how to use rsync (operator error)
> - massively incomplete reports (e.g. just "it fails", without any
>error message.)
> - architectural limitations (e.g. upfront scan)
> - other junk entries
> Too many people fail to realize
