RE: rsync 2.5.5, "unexpected tag failures", Solaris 2.6 vs. 2.8, "--b locking-io" workaround

2002-12-05 Thread Madole, Dave BGI SF
Message- > From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:28 PM > To: Madole, Dave BGI SF > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: rsync 2.5.5, "unexpected tag failures", Solaris 2.6 vs. > 2.8, "--b locking-io"

Re: rsync 2.5.5, "unexpected tag failures", Solaris 2.6 vs. 2.8, "--b locking-io" workaround

2002-12-05 Thread Dave Dykstra
The problem is in your use of "-e rsh"; --blocking-io is assumed if the -e value is equal to the RSYNC_RSH define which is usually "remsh" on solaris but maybe it isn't on solaris 2.8. The --blocking-io option is required for most versions of rsh, but it's sometimes difficult for rsync to know whe