Message-
> From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:28 PM
> To: Madole, Dave BGI SF
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: rsync 2.5.5, "unexpected tag failures", Solaris 2.6 vs.
> 2.8, "--b locking-io"
The problem is in your use of "-e rsh"; --blocking-io is assumed if
the -e value is equal to the RSYNC_RSH define which is usually "remsh"
on solaris but maybe it isn't on solaris 2.8. The --blocking-io option
is required for most versions of rsh, but it's sometimes difficult for
rsync to know whe