2010/2/14 Uri Simchoni uri_simch...@hotmail.com
So I rewrote the main data pump loop of the patch to use non-blocking IO,
and am attaching the new patch.
Thanks! I've done a little cleanup and committed the improved patch. Sorry
for being super slow to get that done.
..wayne..
--
Please
Hi,
I've been working with Casey Marshall's SSL patch, and couldn't get it to work
reliably - the transfer would abort pretty quickly. So I rewrote the main data
pump loop of the patch to use non-blocking IO, and am attaching the new patch.
An rsync program using this patch is interoperable
Hi,
Look into this
http://www.netbits.us/docs/stunnel_rsync.html will help you more.
thanks,
bharthix
Daniel Teklu wrote:
How do I set up rsync over ssl between two unix servers?
Thanks in advance.
-Daniel
--
S.Bharathi Raja,
AU-KBC Research Centre,
M.I.T. Campus
How do I set up rsync over ssl between two unix servers?
Thanks in advance.
-Daniel
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
out with the error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fma]$ rsync -a
--ssl-ca-certs=/usr/share/ssl/certs/caCert.pem
rsync://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/gatekeeper/fma/ samba-test/
SSL: error:140940E5:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:ssl handshake failure
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 5 bytes: phase unknown
A while back, I asked if there had been any consideration in making
rsync support direct ssl (as opposed to just ssh). I've been looking
around for a secure way (e.g. encrypted, so passwords are never in
the clear, and even content is obscured from sniffers) to allow a
set of limited-trust users
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:00:46AM +, M. Drew Streib wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connect,
say SSL, if rejected either fall back or fall out, and if accepted
then away we all
that there
| is no way anyone accessing via SSH could execute any other command.
I'm curious. What's insufficient about the command= authorized_hosts parameter?
| I'm quite confident rsync will work over stunnel. But I don't know if
| there is any effort to standardize a different port number for rsync
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:47:15AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
That way we could do SMTP over SSL etc etc transparently: clients connect,
say SSL, if rejected either fall back or fall out, and if accepted
then away we all go.
Is there some technical reason for not doing things this way?
space
different than the /etc/passwd space, and absolutely ensuring that there
is no way anyone accessing via SSH could execute any other command.
I'm quite confident rsync will work over stunnel. But I don't know if
there is any effort to standardize a different port number for rsync
over
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:41:19PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
I'm finding even less on rsync and SSL. I would have imagined someone
would have done something with this already, but apparently not. So
I guess I need to ask and see for sure: has anyone worked on issues of
using rsync via SSL
I'm finding even less on rsync and SSL. I would have imagined someone
would have done something with this already, but apparently not. So
I guess I need to ask and see for sure: has anyone worked on issues of
using rsync via SSL, such as with stunnel? I want to have encrypted
access, either
12 matches
Mail list logo
