On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> The alternativ (if possible) is to doing the link separatly and then rsync,
> instead of letting rsync doing the linking.
> The end-result is identical
No, it's not identical in one aspect -- file attribute changes to files
with i
On 01/08/2013 07:17:15 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> You might find this useful:
> http://sanitarium.net/unix_stuff/rspaghetti_backup/diff_backup.pl.txt
> It is a script I wrote that diffs 2 backup directories and will tell
> you what is missing between them.
There's always some simple shell (bash) scr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You might find this useful:
http://sanitarium.net/unix_stuff/rspaghetti_backup/diff_backup.pl.txt
It is a script I wrote that diffs 2 backup directories and will tell
you what is missing between them. I can't say whether it will be
faster or slower th
Would be nice if the link-dest option could also be used, if someone
(like me) needs to log the backup history.
As you say, this can reduce the total runtime. It would make sense.
But thanks a lot. I think I can live with the cp -al solution.
Maik
--- Original Message from Matthias Schnied
On 08.01.2013 12:53, Maik Meier wrote:
>
> But I thought rsync tells me all modifications from "source" to
> "backup_new". I just want to write this information into a log-file. I
> know that the file, that is deleted in "source" is not deleted
> physically after rsyncing, because it still exists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is correct. Rsync isn't actually deleting anything therefore it
has nothing to report. It just isn't making a new link.
If you really want to see deletes you can revert to the old method
that was used before --link-dest where you cp -al the old
But I thought rsync tells me all modifications from "source" to
"backup_new". I just want to write this information into a log-file. I
know that the file, that is deleted in "source" is not deleted
physically after rsyncing, because it still exists in backup_old. But
the interesting information to
On 08.01.2013 12:23, Maik Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use rsync to make daily backups using hard-links in this way:
>
> rsync -av --delete --link-dest=../backup_old ./source/. ./backup_new
>
> Does someone know if this a bug, or ist this intended to be or am I
> wrong somethere?
I would th
Hi,
I want to use rsync to make daily backups using hard-links in this way:
rsync -av --delete --link-dest=../backup_old ./source/. ./backup_new
This works great, but the problem is, that rsync does not show correctly
what action it performs (-v option). It shows correctly all new and
changed fi
Hi,
I want to use rsync to make daily backups using hard-links in this way:
rsync -av --delete --link-dest=../backup_old ./source/. ./backup_new
This works great, but the problem is, that rsync does not show correctly
what action it performs (-v option). It shows correctly all new and
changed fi
10 matches
Mail list logo
