https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
>> I am looking for a way to start one rsync command with multiple destinations.
>> My use case:
>> I have one (slow) usb drive which should be synced to two other
>> harddrives. It would be great if rsync could read one file which is to
>> be copied to both hard drives only once, so the slow usb c
On Thu 29 Jan 2015, Johan Kröckel wrote:
> I am looking for a way to start one rsync command with multiple destinations.
> My use case:
> I have one (slow) usb drive which should be synced to two other
> harddrives. It would be great if rsync could read one file which is to
> be copied to both har
I am looking for a way to start one rsync command with multiple destinations.
My use case:
I have one (slow) usb drive which should be synced to two other
harddrives. It would be great if rsync could read one file which is to
be copied to both hard drives only once, so the slow usb connection is
us
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
--- Comment #5 from Dave Yost ---
This is not about running them in parallel.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Korb ---
If you want to run them in parallel then use gnu parallel. It would keep the
specified unmber of jobs running until it runs out of new jobs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for th
How would this be different/better than
rsync options source {dest1 dest2 dest3}
? (The brackets cause bash to repeat the command line for each argument
inside the brackets.)
The only thing I can see is what Kevin pointed out about figuring out
which transfer was involved if an error condition re
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
--- Comment #3 from Dave Yost ---
What I'm after is an argument syntax that supports copying to multiple
destinations.
It's fine by me if rsync executes a multiple-destination command via multiple,
sequential copies.
I am not advocating an incomp
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Korb ---
These would be separate rsync (and ssh) connections. What use case would
justify bundling them together into a single rsync session? The only benefit
over multiple exections of rsync would be a lack of per-sessi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
--- Comment #1 from Dave Yost ---
Something like this would be useful:
rsync foo s1: --add-destinations s2:dir s3:dir
or
rsync foo s1: --to s1: s2:dir s3:~
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
Bug ID: 10963
Summary: rsync to multiple destinations
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
11 matches
Mail list logo
