Re: Difference in vv output with --delete-exclude
On 10 Feb 2001, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happened to the nifty diagnostic output? Good question. I'll have a look at the source. What version are you running? I thought the include/exclude diagnostics for -vv were not released yet. -- Martin Pool, Human Resource Linuxcare. Inc. +61 2 6262 8990 [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://linuxcare.com.au/ Linuxcare. Putting Open Source to work.
Re: child daemons
It only spawns two when receiving, not when sending. The two recv processes are called the "generator" and the "receiver". One does signature generation and the other does file reconstruction. Using two processes makes the pipelining easier.
Re: Difference in vv output with --delete-exclude
Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 10 Feb 2001, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happened to the nifty diagnostic output? Good question. I'll have a look at the source. What version are you running? I thought the include/exclude diagnostics for -vv were not released yet. I'm running: rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24 Configuration: 64-bit files, socketpairs Of a few days ago. We may be talking about different things here. All I meant was the verbose output of using -vv gets shut off somehow by using the --delete-exclude flag.
