Martin -
Thanks. I'll grab it and give it a try.
-- Scott
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:54:41PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 7 Mar 2002, Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using rsync 2.5.2 but have seen this with 2.5.1. My system is Red Hat
7.2 with the current errata updates.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:54:41PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 7 Mar 2002, Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using rsync 2.5.2 but have seen this with 2.5.1. My system is Red Hat
7.2 with the current errata updates. Using rsyncd with xinetd it seems as if
old processes never
Greetings,
I have searched through most of the rsync FAQ and can't find any similar
cases. I'm hoping someone in this mailing list may have done it in the
past and can shred lights on me.
First of all, I am not new to rsync and we have been using it to
move/mirror data across our internal
Ich werde ab 11.03.2002 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
25.03.2002.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Heinz Maier,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . (0211/61078-50)
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
Greeting.
I'm so sorry that I launched the previous email by mistake and before I
had a chance to complete it. Here is the summary of my previous
question.
We would like to use rsync to mirror the contents from our internal
staging server ( A) to the external website (B) at our ISP without
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I like link-dest, and the - for exclude-from/include-from was already
something I was planning to add one of these days along with the
--files-from option I still plan
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:41:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I like link-dest, and the - for exclude-from/include-from was already
something I was planning to add
I wrote:
Hopefully they will accept your patch and there will be a 1.1.4 release,
which also incorporates the infblock.c fixes. It would be bad to have
different (broken) versions of zlib out there when this can easily be
avoided.
http://www.gzip.org/zlib/ says
Version 1.1.4 fixes a
Through what method might rsync determine whether a file on the
destination is from the source and since deleted, or created on the
destination, when even you have no way of knowing. You would need a
complete history of both filesystems, every create, rename, move, insert,
delete, append,
It seems the patch we merged into rsync 2.5.3 is not correct and -z is
not reliable. I'll do another release shortly.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I'm having serious problems with the current 2.5.3 release under
Debian testing and the 2.4.19-pre2 Linux kernel.
As you can see from the appended build log, I get many compiler
warnings. More seriously, when I install and try to use the
resulting binaries over ssh, things bomb horribly, e,g:
On 11 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having serious problems with the current 2.5.3 release under
Debian testing and the 2.4.19-pre2 Linux kernel.
As you can see from the appended build log, I get many compiler
warnings. More seriously, when I install and try to use the
resulting
Unfortunately the zlib security fix was broken in 2.5.3. I think it's
fixed now in 2.5.4pre1. If you can, please try 2.5.4pre1 and see if
that will fix it; alternatively don't use -z.
So far, so good; 2.5.4pre1 seems to work correctly when 2.5.3 did not.
Since -z is so widely used, I suggest
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 08:45:44PM -0800, Jennifer Lu wrote:
I tried to compile rsync2.5.3 on Solaris5.7, and I still
got the same errors as Solaris5.8, can you please help
me to look at the problem? I got error messages:
Configure was run successfully, then I ran make,
I got:
14 matches
Mail list logo
