Just did a successful rsync -- problem was with reiser filesystem.
Moved all files off the raid, ran reiserfsck with --rebuild-tree (fix-fixable
was not enough), ran rsync after rebuild finished -- no problems.
There were a number of files that the rebuild-tree found that weren't attached
Craig, I'd like to get your patch into the 2.5.6 patches directory.
Could you please make sure it applies cleanly onto version 2.5.6pre1 (see
news on http://rsync.samba.org home page if you haven't been following
the mailing list) and repost it?
Thanks,
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at
Hi,
I don't want to start another --files-from war, but I am attaching
an updated version of my patch to allow you to specify a list
of files to transfer. The normal rsync syntax allows you to specify
a list of SRC files to transfer on the command line. This patch
adds some new options to allow
2.5.6pre1 bombs on Sunos4 gcc with these errors
popt/popthelp.c: In function `singleOptionDefaultValue':
popt/popthelp.c:137: invalid operands to binary +
popt/popthelp.c:141: invalid operands to binary +
popt/popthelp.c:145: invalid operands to binary +
popt/popthelp.c:149:
This is a patch to add an --rsync-exclude option to rsync-2.5.6cvs.
File names in .rsync- (or .rsync+) are excluded (or included) from the file
lists associated with the current directory and all of its subdirectories.
This has advantages over --cvs-exclude for backing up large file systems
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:03:23PM -0500, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
Greetings -
In trying to get rsync-2.5.6pre1 working on DYNIX/ptx, I found I
needed to pass ac_cv_lib_inet_connect=no to configure in order for
it actually create a properly configured config.h file.
Hi,
I got the following error messages when ran rsync2.5.5 on
Solaris5.9, I have used this version for a long time
until this week, I got the following errors:
ERROR: out of memory in string_area_new buffer
rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(232)
rsync:
Is it possible to do live backups of a running DB with rsync???
I was just talking to livevault.com they (only on win boxes) say they
can grab changes from a client's live DB sync them remotely.
It sounded like BS to me, but I'm neither a DB guy or sync'ing expert.
Steve Mallett
--
To
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:24:04AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
2.5.6pre1 bombs on Sunos4 gcc with these errors
popt/popthelp.c: In function `singleOptionDefaultValue':
popt/popthelp.c:137: invalid operands to binary +
popt/popthelp.c:141: invalid operands to binary +
On Tue, 2003-01-14 15:44:26 -0400, Steve Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it possible to do live backups of a running DB with rsync???
I was just talking to livevault.com they (only on win boxes) say they
can grab changes from a client's live DB sync them
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 22:46, Florian-Daniel Otel wrote:
Aaron,
Aaron Morris writes:
rsync is just doing what your are telling it to do. Update if the file
is changed or does not exist on the remote side and delete if it no
longer exists on the local side.
Yes, I can RTFM, and,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:02:44AM -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
I am attaching an updated version of my patch to allow you to specify
a list of files to transfer.
Cool. I'm looking into making this work when fetching files. Towards
that end, I'd like to suggest an alternate command-line
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:21:29PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:02:44AM -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
I am attaching an updated version of my patch to allow you to specify
a list of files to transfer.
Cool. I'm looking into making this work when fetching files.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:32:41PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I haven't looked at the implementation, but comments on the user
interface:
1. Yes it should take a filename or - as a parameter.
2. I don't like the idea of skipping the SRC spec. Paths should be
relative to the
Aaron W Morris writes:
Truth to be told, after a bit of thinking I _might_ accept the fact
that --update ignores the timestamps on (sub)directories. Because
if it didn't, if any file was touch-ed remotely after the last rsync
than all subdirs, up to and including to the top dir,
Hi,
This is perhaps a stupid question. I apologize in advance if it's already
been covered, but I'm stumped...
I'm using rsync to backup some file systems to a remote host.
The transport is openssh-2.9.9p2.
The problem does not occur when the transport is rsh.
I'm invoking rsync as follows:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Steve Mallett wrote:
Is it possible to do live backups of a running DB with rsync???
I was just talking to livevault.com they (only on win boxes) say they
can grab changes from a client's live DB sync them remotely.
It sounded like BS to me, but I'm neither a DB
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:48:31AM -0700, John Bowman wrote:
This is a patch to add an --rsync-exclude option to rsync-2.5.6cvs.
File names in .rsync- (or .rsync+) are excluded (or included) from the file
lists associated with the current directory and all of its subdirectories.
This has
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:20:43AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:24:04AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
2.5.6pre1 bombs on Sunos4 gcc with these errors
popt/popthelp.c: In function `singleOptionDefaultValue':
popt/popthelp.c:137: invalid operands to binary +
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:11:20AM -0800, Jennifer Lu wrote:
Hi,
I got the following error messages when ran rsync2.5.5 on
Solaris5.9, I have used this version for a long time
until this week, I got the following errors:
ERROR: out of memory in string_area_new buffer
rsync error:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:32:41PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
1. Yes it should take a filename or - as a parameter.
2. I don't like the idea of skipping the SRC spec. Paths should be
relative to the SRC. If somebody wants to use full paths they
can always have a SRC of /.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:44:26PM -0400, Steve Mallett wrote:
Is it possible to do live backups of a running DB with rsync???
I was just talking to livevault.com they (only on win boxes) say they
can grab changes from a client's live DB sync them remotely.
It sounded like BS to me, but
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:57:51PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:32:41PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
1. Yes it should take a filename or - as a parameter.
2. I don't like the idea of skipping the SRC spec. Paths should be
relative to the SRC. If
Hi,
I'd like to know if RSYNC work on a Sun Cobalt
RaQ550. Does someone trid it? If yes, please let me know if I can take contact
with you.
Stephane
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:35:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Absolute paths are bad news here. Especially when dealing with an
rsync daemon.
Yes, this is something that needs to be dealt with for daemon mode since
it does not appear to have been possible to specify multiple filenames
to pull
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:41:22PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:35:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Absolute paths are bad news here. Especially when dealing with an
rsync daemon.
Yes, this is something that needs to be dealt with for daemon mode since
it does not
FYI, pulling multiple files from a daemon currently supported (well, it
works). Given a package of foo you can specify:
rsync -av 'remote::foo/file1 foo/file5' /tmp
It appears the daemon does proper splitting based on either white-space,
or possibly the current value of $IFS in the daemon's
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:02:58PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Up till now rsync hasn't touched anything outside of the paths
specified on the command-line. Changing that would mean access to
rsync via ssh would no longer be restricted, just disabled.
Are you saying that some people have special
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:15:02PM -0600, Lee Eakin wrote:
FYI, pulling multiple files from a daemon currently supported (well, it
works). Given a package of foo you can specify:
rsync -av 'remote::foo/file1 foo/file5' /tmp
Oh! I had left off the repeat of the module name when I tried to
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:39:49PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:02:58PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
Up till now rsync hasn't touched anything outside of the paths
specified on the command-line. Changing that would mean access to
rsync via ssh would no longer be
Please pardon my butting in again. I am not a developer, but I am very
interested in this option because I've need it in the past and had to work
around the lack of it with include/exclude options (I wanted to sync only
a few files from a large directory, and needed it to work via the daemon
for
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:01:47PM -0600, Lee Eakin wrote:
Please pardon my butting in again. I am not a developer, but I am very
interested in this option because I've need it in the past and had to work
around the lack of it with include/exclude options (I wanted to sync only
a few files
---begin quoted text---
From: jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:07:58 -0800
Nope. The files-from contents needs to passed on stdin otherwise
we would hit command-line length limits. That is why i'm
stressing the fact that allowing paths not within the source
or
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:15:42PM -0600, Lee Eakin wrote:
---begin quoted text---
From: jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:07:58 -0800
Nope. The files-from contents needs to passed on stdin otherwise
we would hit command-line length limits. That is why i'm
From: jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:33:46 -0800
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:15:42PM -0600, Lee Eakin wrote:
---begin quoted text---
From: jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:07:58 -0800
Nope. The files-from contents needs to passed on
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:15:47AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
The first rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at:
...
* Updated included popt to the latest vendor drop, version 1.6.4.
(Jos Backus)
Latest version of popt is 1.7:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:59:47PM -0500, Scott Evans wrote:
Known issues that will probably need to be resolved before the final
release:
[...]
Is there any interest in trying to hunt down the linux - cygwin
rsync hanging problem I'm consistently seeing before this
37 matches
Mail list logo
