Re: --delete option

2004-10-30 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 29 Oct 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a bit paranoid, but had to ask-- How safe is it to use the --delete option? ie, when using it locally (or via a mounted network volume), will I *ever* have to worry about my actual source files being delete mistakenly (instead of dest.

Re: --delete option

2004-10-30 Thread johhhn
thanks, that's what I wanted to hear (: On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:22:16 +0200, Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri 29 Oct 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a bit paranoid, but had to ask-- How safe is it to use the --delete option? ie, when using it locally (or via a mounted

--ignore-times transfers all files every sync

2004-10-30 Thread Joost van den Broek
I'm using several Windows 2000 clients to sync their contents with an Linux rsync server. Since I found out that some files not always changes their mod-time and size, while they're actually changed, I decided to use the --checksum option. Unfortunately this option is very slow and requires

Re: --ignore-times transfers all files every sync

2004-10-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:28:44PM +0200, Joost van den Broek wrote: With [--ignore-times] enabled, all files get's transferred every sync. That's what that option does -- it turns off the quick-check algorithm and transfers all the files. There is also the --size-only option, but that wouldn't

Re: rsync through high latency connection

2004-10-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 07:03:43PM -0700, Rudy Moore wrote: I noticed in the feature list that rsync pipelines file transfers to minimize latency - does this only affect transfer of large numbers of files? It should be true of any transfer, but I'd estimate that the round-trip time gets