DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4957] rsync with acl patch crashes with fuzzy option
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4957 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-10 09:55 CST --- ah, perfect. thanks for the confirmation and the hint about 2.6.9! if there is no issue with 3.0, you can probably close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
code 5 error
Hello rsync users I'm having the following problem could someone help me? Inicio do backup - Seg Set 10 14:45:07 BRT 2007 @ERROR: auth failed on module srvmail rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at main.c(1383) [sender=2.6.9] Fim do backup - Seg Set 10 14:45:07 BRT 2007 My confs http://rapido.mfplan.com.br -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: What is the different between these rsync command
On 9/9/07, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first two commands do exactly the same thing because the destination has a single colon, indicating rsync over a remote shell, and the default remote shell is ssh. All -e ssh does in this situation is explicitly restate the default. (If the source or destination is an rsync daemon, -e ssh does make a difference: it indicates a single-use daemon invoked over ssh.) Matt Unless it is a really old version of rsync where the default shell was rsh. Yue, what version of rsync are you using? -- Aaron W Morris (decep) -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4957] rsync with acl patch crashes with fuzzy option
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4957 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-10 21:00 CST --- excellent. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Batch mode scenario (use case)
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:17:05PM +, Suresh Govindachar wrote: Responding to the question of how to use the batch file /e/cmds/foo created via the command: rsync -a --only-write-batch=/e/cmds/foo /c/home/wer/work/ /e/gold to selectively restore a subdirectory of work/ such as some/path/projects/c_a into a new location such as /f/new_home/wer/work which has a copy of some/path/projects/c_a gotten from /e/gold but is otherwise empty, Matt wrote: Rsync currently doesn't provide a good way to do this. It would be great if sender filters could be used to control which file-list entries from the batch file are processed. For now, a hackish way to quickly recover a subdirectory is to --read-batch to a destination that has been set up specially so that the user cannot write to anything in the destination except the subdirectory to be recovered. Is there a specification for the format of the batch file? The batch file format is simply a dump of rsync's network protocol. That way, replaying the batch file is quite similar to performing the original sync, except for the bytes come from the file instead of from the socket. At least, that's the way it worked last time I looked, which was several years ago. -chris Might it be possible to write a script to read /e/cmds/foo and create a new batch file that would correspond to having been created while rsync'ing --only-write-batch of work/path/c_a with gold/path/c_a? Thanks, --Suresh -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: code 5 error
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:55:36PM -0300, infolistas listas wrote: @ERROR: auth failed on module srvmail That means that you didn't specify the right user and/or the right password to the rsync daemon transfer. The server's log will tell you exactly what was wrong, if you have access to it (that info is not provided to the user to make it harder to guess usernames). ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Batch mode scenario (use case)
On 9/9/07, Suresh Govindachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about the following scheme? open /e/cmds/foo do till end-of-file: begin-continue discard lines till there is a match to some/path/projects/c_a keep lines till there is a match to a directory outside c_a Note that the lines being kept could be data/commands corresponding to files inside c_a end-continue end-do write kept lines to new batch file This is a clever idea, but I think it would be very difficult to subset the batch file correctly since the rsync protocol is quite complex (and binary). For one thing, the new batch file would need to contain the protocol initialization and at least the relevant portion of the file list. You might be able to accomplish this by keeping everything until the first file transfer is logged, but that won't work if the sender used incremental recursion because the relevant portion of the file list will be randomly interspersed with file transfers. If you need to restore a subtree from a batch file, another thing you could do is make a modified copy of rsync just for the job with a strncmp thrown in to skip all file transfers except the ones in the subtree. Also, instead of a batch file, you might consider copying to a new destination with --compare-dest to the original; that gives you a tree of changed files from which you can easily restore files or subtrees. Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
CVS update: rsync
Date: Mon Sep 10 06:15:22 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22244 Modified Files: proto.h Log Message: Regenerated. Revisions: proto.h 1.347 = 1.348 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/proto.h?r1=1.347r2=1.348 ___ rsync-cvs mailing list rsync-cvs@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync-cvs
CVS update: rsync
Date: Mon Sep 10 06:15:25 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22274 Modified Files: hlink.c Log Message: - Simplified the flist-spanning gnum logic in match_gnums(). - Don't use hlink_flist in hard_link_check(). - Made the prev_name logic in hard_link_check() better. - Added an ndx arg to the finish_hard_link() call. Also, set the prev value of any prior entries to the first finished item (which ensures that any item that follows a re-shuffled item (which was waiting for a transferred file to finish) can find the FIRST+DONE item. Revisions: hlink.c 1.87 = 1.88 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/hlink.c?r1=1.87r2=1.88 ___ rsync-cvs mailing list rsync-cvs@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync-cvs
CVS update: rsync
Date: Mon Sep 10 06:15:28 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22332 Modified Files: generator.c Log Message: Added an ndx arg to all the finish_hard_link() calls. Revisions: generator.c 1.353 = 1.354 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/generator.c?r1=1.353r2=1.354 ___ rsync-cvs mailing list rsync-cvs@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync-cvs
