rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd .
lots of stuff works, but then
dvd/setdir/www/web_admin-1.0-noarch-001.tgz
1306806 100%3.34MB/s0:00:00 (xfer#927, to-check=1004/2734)
dvd/setdir/xlibs/
deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gstreamer-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
deleting
Hi,
I'm using the following command to move files from a to b:
rsync -a --remove-source-files --ignore-existing /path/to/dir1/
/path/to/dir2 logfile
dir2 isn't empty so I only move files from dir1 to dir2 that don't exist
already.
Every so often rsync stops in the middle and doesn't continue
Hi,
I've been trying to use --checksum-seed to speed up backups . I have
a
homebrew script which creates incremental backups using hardlinks. To save
disk space I turn on --checksum so that when file's mod-times change rsync
doesn't create a new file (breaking the hardlinking) unless
Hi,
I am using cwrsync ver 2.1.5 over SSH to connect to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and facing
some problems and not sure how to go about it. Below is the full text of the
result when I run the batch file. Was wondering if anyone has seen any
similar issue. Any thoughts/help is much appreciated.
I've been using rsync to back-up user files on samba shares. The idea was
to capture the file changes from day to day work, back all changes and new
files to a server with limited access. If someone wanted to delete the
files, there would be a back-up of their work.
While checking logs the
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:51 -0400, Naveen Sajjan wrote:
I am using cwrsync ver 2.1.5 over SSH to connect to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and facing some problems and not sure how to go
about it. Below is the full text of the result when I run the batch
file. Was wondering if anyone has seen any similar
Hi there,
I've been googling around and yet could not find if there's a decent
solution to avoid OS cache while copying files with rsync. It would be
good if that worked both on client and on server side.
If not some rsync patches (or features in upcoming releases), maybe
you know of some
Hello,
i use rsync from Windows to rsync on Linux via ssh and get IO Errors
and connection unexpectedly closed errors on almost every sync run.
Can anybody give me some hints on how to track down the problem?
thx, Chris
2008/10/11 09:41:04 [13744] rsync to backup// from UNKNOWN (w.x.y.z)
Hello again,
now i also tried to sync from an 32bit linux machine to a 64bit linux
machine and i got the same error message reported on the server side,
so i think it isn't a problem due to different operating systems.
the last log messages are:
client:
Hello,
i see lots of error messages with io.c(1123) showing up, but i don't
know where to get the exact revision of this io.c file?
Can anybody tell me where i can find the CVS repository for example
rsync 2.6.9 to get the exact revision of the mentioned file for
debugging purposes?
thx, Chris
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 22:39 +0200, Chris Joelly wrote:
i see lots of error messages with io.c(1123) showing up, but i don't
know where to get the exact revision of this io.c file?
Can anybody tell me where i can find the CVS repository for example
rsync 2.6.9 to get the exact revision of
Naveen, please CC rsync@lists.samba.org so that others can help you and
your messages are archived for others' future benefit.
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 15:47 -0400, Naveen Sajjan wrote:
I just used the rsync -av hostname and I was able to connect.
hmm...Didn't seem to use SSH.
I guess that means
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:02 -0400, CSights wrote:
I've been trying to use --checksum-seed to speed up backups . I have
a
homebrew script which creates incremental backups using hardlinks. To save
disk space I turn on --checksum so that when file's mod-times change rsync
doesn't
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:47 -0500, Mark Busby wrote:
I've been using rsync to back-up user files on samba shares. The idea was
to capture the file changes from day to day work, back all changes and new
files to a server with limited access. If someone wanted to delete the
files, there would
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 17:10 -0500, Paul Mantz wrote:
Does there exist a formal specification of the protocols, or is the
only way to learn the protocol to reverse engineer it from the source
tree?
As far as I know, there is no specification other than the source tree.
Matt
--
Please use
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 21:19 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote:
I'm using the following command to move files from a to b:
rsync -a --remove-source-files --ignore-existing /path/to/dir1/
/path/to/dir2 logfile
dir2 isn't empty so I only move files from dir1 to dir2 that don't exist
already.
rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd .
lots of stuff works, but then
dvd/setdir/www/web_admin-1.0-noarch-001.tgz
1306806 100%3.34MB/s0:00:00 (xfer#927, to-check=1004/2734)
dvd/setdir/xlibs/
deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gstreamer-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
deleting
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 01:03 -0400, Franck Y wrote:
Quick Question i will have to download the source [to use a backup
dir] ?
It is already running on my system ? I have installed though a rpm ?
Your RPM-installed
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 23:20 -0400, Franck Y wrote:
I got the source and rebuild it since i needed the --backup-dir-dels
option.
I sucesfully compiled it within my remote and my host.
I have a little script that is working so i added the
--backup-dir-dels
rsync --owner --group
Would it be more efficient to use rsync to get filestats instead of
using the 'find' command? I would like to know how big a directory is
on a filesystem, but this directory has millions of small files. I was
wondering if rsync would be more efficient than find when using -n
options.
TIA
--
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 22:50 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
Would it be more efficient to use rsync to get filestats instead of
using the 'find' command? I would like to know how big a directory is
on a filesystem, but this directory has millions of small files. I was
wondering if rsync would be more
Great. Thanks matt. I was using the find method, but I want to find a
better way to get my directory sizes. I suppose a find -printf may
work.
If anyone else has suggestions please let me know.
TIA
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 00:28 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
Great. Thanks matt. I was using the find method, but I want to find a
better way to get my directory sizes. I suppose a find -printf may
work.
find -printf will give you the sizes of the directories (as lists of
entries) themselves. If you
23 matches
Mail list logo
