On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 03:21:51AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 20 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, by the way, even if the batch stuff accomplishes the same performance
gains, I would still argue that the --files-from type of behavior
that I implemented is a nice
Howdy,
It would be nice if there was a low-volume rsync-announce mailing list
for announcements of new releases and security-related information. This
would help casual users keep current on rsync without the relatively high volume
generated on the rsync list. Just a suggestion.
--
Marc
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 04:52:02PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to rsync and trying to configure it to run through either the daemon
or rsh (ssh is not avalilable). Doing an 'rlogin production' results in a
password prompt - which I want rid of, as we're basically going to have a
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:37:33PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I'll apply something like Jos's patch, with a modification to not
create another bloody global variable but instead stick it in an
options struct.
Good idea. Btw, Openssh also uses structs to pass options around.
People who work
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:39:23PM +0100, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
Hi there!
I'm quite happily using rsync.
There is only one case where I couldn't figure out how to use it
efficently:
I sometimes have large compressed files (either .tar.gz or .zip) that
I need to keep synchronized. The
Hello everyone.
I can't seem to get the --password-file= option to work correctly. I'm using
ssh as the transport. I've got the file 0600 and only the password with no
carriage return.
Can someone provide an example of use. Here is my try:
rsync -rtvvuz -e ssh --password-file=file
On 26 Nov 2001, Andrew J. Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand your point of view, but I think it is a mistake to
hold rsync's algorithm hostage to the directory tree traversal logic
built into the program.
IMHO, the basic file transfer algorithm of rsync is terrific, but
the
On 23 Nov 2001, Andre Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:05:32PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
How about adding a --no-detach option (to be used in combination with
supervise? If there's interest I'll provide a patch.
Yes, this is great. I wanted it today when trying to
