Hi,
I'm using rsync for a couple of things but I am at a point where I could not find a
solution for my problem.
this is what I want to do:
rsync only the files i_* from a directory from machine A to machine Bi and delete them
from machine B if they on longer exist on machine A.
so I use
These all look fine, but somewhere along the line they got mangled so
that they won't apply properly. Would you mind please sending them to
me as an attachment or something? (Yes, I'm lazy ;-)
--
Martin
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:01:59AM +0100, Palmans Pepijn wrote:
Hi,
I'm using rsync for a couple of things but I am at a point where I could
not find a solution for my problem.
this is what I want to do:
rsync only the files i_* from a directory from machine A to machine Bi
and delete
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 02:35:53PM -0500, David L Nickel wrote:
Next week are going to start using rsync live to mirror our primary and
secondary web servers. I am still trying to iron out a couple of bugs, any
help would be much apprecitated.
Here is my rsync.conf file on my primary web
check this out: echo rsync -azv --stats -e ssh --delete i_* user@host:/dir/.
it expands to sync -azv --stats -e ssh --delete all existing i_* files
user@host:/dir/ It won't mention the ones that are gone.
rsync the directory/. including i_* and excluding * (the order matters).
rsync -azv
It looks like Martin just put this fix into CVS because he turned on -Wall
on gcc and noticed a warning message.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 09:34:27PM -0600, John Malmberg wrote:
Probably, but that just means that there was an addtional bug in the
original code.
At this phase,
From www.cygwin.com (did you even look there?).
ftp://mirrors.rcn.net/pub/sourceware/cygwin/contrib/rsync/rsync-2.5.1-2.tar.bz2
Tim Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D
Longmont, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect within
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 08:55:24PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I'm having second thoughts about merging the rsync+ / batch mode patch
into the main rsync release. It adds a lot of extra paths to the
code. I can see it will be useful for a few people, but I'm not sure
it's sufficiently general
Thanks.
From www.cygwin.com (did you even look there?).
Yes I did, but couldn't find it, and I didn't want to do a full cygwin
install (I did that two years ago, debugged and solved a problem with rsync
running on netware volumes). At that time there were people offering their
win32 binaries
I created a user on the machine I am attempting to mirror.
I when I run rsync with this user I get the following errors
receiving file list ... link_stat www : No such file or directory
done
client: nothing to do: perhaps you need to specify some filenames or
the --recursive option?
rsync
Aack, I just noticed that the --whole-file option was accidentally changed
to --whole when the option parsing mechanism was switched to popt before
rsync 2.5.0. I just put a fix into the rsync CVS, but anybody who wants
that option to work with all versions of rsync is going to have to use -W
On Tuesday 15 Jan 02, Carlos Gutierrez writes:
ftp://mirrors.rcn.net/pub/sourceware/cygwin/contrib/rsync/rsync-2.5.1-2.tar.
bz2
Thanks for the direct link.
In case anybody needs it, here is a ZIP with rsync and cygwin dll.
http://www.sca.com.mx/ftp/rsync.2.5.1-2.zip
*Sigh* Please don't do
Ok, you're talking about ssh, and you're talking about a rsyncd. Except
in rare cases, you don't use ssh to access rsyncd. I'm guessing you're
doing something like
rsync -e ssh remotehost:www localdestinationdirectory
(-e ssh isn't needed if $RSYNC_SSH=ssh). drop the -e ssh and use TWO
It sounded like he had a working installation already, and just needed to
add rsync to it. I did mine by compiling it in (though i wonder if the
one you supply might not have that annoying conection reset by peer
error or whatever it was). I tried rerunning setup once, just checking
the
Good catch.
Tridge suggested the other day that it's bad to make -W the default
for local transfers, because it makes behaviour kind of less
reproducible: people who test rsync locally will see possibly
different bugs when running it over the network. I'm inclined to
agree, but I'm not sure.
15 matches
Mail list logo
