Dave,
I applied your patch for socket.c and recompiled the binary. The logs on the
server now show the following:
2002/01/24 11:30:41 [3132] rsync denied on module etc from unknown
(:::192.168.5.20)
2002/01/24 11:32:12 [3139] reverse+forward lookup for :::192.168.5.20
Sounds pretty useful. I think perhaps it would be better at the -vv level
though.
- Dave
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:23:21PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I think we should make rsync say something like this when -v is
specified:
rsync: Attempting connection using ssh -v samba.org rsync
Three copies of the spam? I'm not saying we should do anything illegal,
but it would be interesting to see what would happen if members of the
list who are in countries where they can get away with it were to destroy
and deface http://hop.clickbank.net with messages indicating that it was
Tim,
Currently I have rsync setup on hosta which syncs to
hostb. Rsync deletes whatever deleted from hosta and
copy and sync from hosta to hostb. Does rsync catch
changes made and sync hosta in case any changes are
made to hostb?
Please let me know.
Thanks
Raj
=
These are the items that iam interested in selling..
Could you help me with some details on the goods, history, origin etc.
are these worth anything and if so who would i contact with regards to
selling them? and the best way to sell them ie auction etc
APOLOGISE IF YOU HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED
These are the items that iam interested in selling..
Could you help me with some details on the goods, history, origin etc.
are these worth anything and if so who would i contact with regards to
selling them? and the best way to sell them ie auction etc
APOLOGISE IF YOU HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:41:36PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:05:15AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 04:37:53PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 17 Jan 2002, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you get a chance, could you please look at
rsync tries to make the files the same. If you include mode, that's that.
Perhaps you could modify generator.c for your own copy, to mask off the
suid and sgid bits, so the list would make them all look non-suid, source
and dest, and thus not try to set them, and not care that they're not
No. Rsync is unidirectional.
If you try to do it both ways, first, it's going to delete anything on
hostb that isn't on hosta, then make all the files on hostb just like
hosta. Then, if you try to go back the other way, all the changes on
hostb are already gone.
There is a product called
it's in syscall.c, not generator.c
You'll have to save the status of the lstat, modify the mode in st, and
return the lstat status. I don't know how to do it, though.
#if SUPPORT_LINKS
int do_lstat(const char *fname, STRUCT_STAT *st)
{
#if HAVE_OFF64_T
return lstat64(fname, st);
#else
Hello list members,
I notice here that the --server option is listed as undocumented.
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync/fom-serve/cache/88.html
My question is that the --server option is not documented, and I'd like
not to build functionality into one of my systems without trusting that it
Hello,
Rsync maintainers, could you evaluate the patches in Debian bugs #129135
and #124286? #129135 seems straightforward enough.
They are accessible at:
http://bugs.debian.org/129135
and
http://bugs.debian.org/124286
Also, I haven't gotten an evaluation of my patch for #128632 (previously
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:41:36PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
Fwiw, I'm currently working on getting rid of the automatically generated
filenames --write-batch creates, instead --write-batch should accept a suffix,
just like --read-batch. With that working I'll convert the suffix into a
prefix,
Hi there,
The s in the permissions isn't in reference to the setuid bit. It's
referencing the fact that those files are Unix domain sockets (if
they were setuid, the s would be in place of the user's x, ie
-rwsr-xr-x). The reason it is failing is because BSD's mknod
(which rsync uses to
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:22:58PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Yes, I'll look at doing some documentation. What about a paragraph titled
``About batch mode'' with a little explanation how it works, how it differs
from normal rsync operation and a small example?
Sounds like a good idea. Of
On 25 Jan 2002, Kenneth Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I have several Linux machines running the Debian unstable distribution.
Until recently I used rsync version 2.4.6 without any problems, but after
upgrading to version 2.5.1 (using apt-get) rsync fails.
The command that produces
16 matches
Mail list logo
