Compaq and IBM computers starting from $125 !!!

Title: Message Your email address was obtained from a subscribed service, Reference # 4060-6106If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please Click Here This email was intended to be received in HTML format. If you did not receive this email in the proper form, Click Here

2 errors when running rsync

I'm kinda new to rsync, and decided to mirror openssl.org. When running the command below, as suggested by openssl.org, I get the following.. rsync -rztpv --delete rsync://ftp.openssl.org/openssl-ftp/ /home/ftp/pub/openssl/ I get the output: - receiving file list ... opendir(inco

Re: new rsync release needed soon?

On 1 Aug 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another change that I think really ought to go in is something like > the one at > > http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2002-February/006371.html > > to get the correct error codes out of rsync. But first I think we > really need

Re: rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at main.c(925)

Hi, Sorry I didn't want to fill my original mail up with too much info :-\ Rsync on the Linux box is exactly the same version also compiled from source. SSH on Solaris Box: SSH Version Sun_SSH_1.0, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. SSH on Linux Box: OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x

Re: daemon-server via SSH (was Re: new rsync release needed soon?)

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:08:36PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > I think the way JD did it was the compromise we agreed on: if a userid > > is specified only with userid@hostname, it should be used for both > > purposes, but if the -e command includes -l

Re: daemon-server via SSH (was Re: new rsync release needed soon?)

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > I think the way JD did it was the compromise we agreed on: if a userid > is specified only with userid@hostname, it should be used for both > purposes, but if the -e command includes -l it should override the > login userid only. OK, that makes sense. I'

Re: daemon-server via SSH (was Re: new rsync release needed soon?)

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:25:50PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote: ... > One thing that did not work for me is the "hosts allow" and presumably > "hosts deny": it says "@ERROR: access denied to testdir from unknown ()". > There was code on the server side that's reads $SSH_CLIENT for the IP > address a

Re: Connection refused

> >> rsh is good: >> >> [g3p:~] smith% rsh -l a1012 sv1.domain.com >> Password: >> {[EMAIL PROTECTED]:65} >> >> rsync not good: >> ... > > actually, "rsh" is not good enough. it's asking you for a password, > which means without user/pwd authentication it won't run. > Being it's a secret whe

Re: new rsync release needed soon?

Another change that I think really ought to go in is something like the one at http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2002-February/006371.html to get the correct error codes out of rsync. But first I think we really need to hear from Tridge why he put that code there in the first place. M

Re: daemon-server via SSH (was Re: new rsync release needed soon?)

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:54:29PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > The patch that I'd most like to see get in JD Paul's patch for using > > SSH and daemon mode together. > > I've completed my mods to get this updated to the latest CVS version and > then

Re: Large File Support on AIX 4.3.3

Large file support on 2.5.5 is also not working for HP/UX 11.0. I get the same error.. And rsync reports that 64 bit files are compiled in. aurora:/ # rsync rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others Capabilities: 64

Large File Support on AIX 4.3.3

I've been trying to get rsync to work on AIX 4.3.3 with files > 2GB. I've looked through the archives and saw reference to this, etc. on HPUX but have not been able to come across a solution for AIX. I've tried compiling with the following flags without luck: "-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_

hi there

Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00F2_23I34L5M.N2565R86"

[bug] copying remote files to forbidden directory

Hello, [ please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed here. ] we were bitten by another rsync bug of the same nature as was discussed in http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2002-May/007399.html alexm@rack8:~$ rsync -az -e ssh rack6.domain.ru:/etc/passwd /var/tmp/forbiden-dir/ mkstemp .passwd.oPlFQm

Re: rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at main.c(925)

What does your command line look like? Are you running the same version on the Linux box? It might also help to know the version of SSH on both ends. - Dave Dykstra On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Dogsbody wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm new to this group so please be gentle, I have scoure

Re: rsync: omit summary with a single -v

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:09:04PM -0700, Peter E. Popovich wrote: > I'm having a similar-but-different issues when scripting multiple rsyncs. > I'd like to do a dry run each with the -n option, display the aggregated > output and prompt the user for approval before proceeding. In testing, > I'v

Re: Patronizing the exclude * option

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:44:26AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: ... > To the list in general: > Wasn't there a --files-from option someone was working on? Yeah, I promised to work on it quite some time ago but I haven't been able to get it to the top of my priority list and I don't see any change to

Re: Patronizing the exclude * option

>Maybe --include=*/ --exclude=* ? > >Of course, that will sync the entire directory tree, but without >files that are >not explicitely included. >Ugly, but won't waste much transfer time. Seems I have a working script now... #!/bin/sh # name of script: subdirname # This script takes a root dir

Re: new rsync release needed soon?

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:02:03PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: ... > Talking syntax reminds me of another patch that I think should go in: > the one that makes rsync accept rsync:// syntax in the destination, not > just the source. Anyone disagree with that? I agree with it. Remember to add the

Re: Connection refused

>rsh is good: > >[g3p:~] smith% rsh -l a1012 sv1.domain.com >Password: >{[EMAIL PROTECTED]:65} > >rsync not good: >... actually, "rsh" is not good enough. it's asking you for a password, which means without user/pwd authentication it won't run. for example, try this: smith% rsh -l a1012 sv1.

Connection refused

I'm sure this has been asked a zillion times so I searched for hours before posting this. How can there be so little documentation on this. Point me to what to read. rsh is good: [g3p:~] smith% rsh -l a1012 sv1.domain.com Password: {[EMAIL PROTECTED]:65} rsync not good: [g3p:~] smith% rsync

Re: Patronizing the exclude * option

Maurice Volaski wrote: > I need to get around the requirement of --exclude=* to have all the > parent directories of the files and directories that are to be > included. So given the file.. > > /startdirectory/subdirectory1/subdirectory2/filetobecopied > > I need to include > / > /subdirectory1 >

ADV: Harvest lots of E-mail addresses quickly !

Dear rsync ,    Want To Harvest A Lot Of Email   Addresses In A Very Short Time? Easy Email Searcher  is  a  powerful  Email  software   that  harvests general Email lists from mail servers   Easy Email Searcher can get 100,000 Ema