Re: 2.5.6 release

2002-11-06 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $B5HF#1QL@(B
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:45:02 -0800), jw 
schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:

  I think there really have been no commits since then:
  
http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/?sortby=date#dirlist
  
  We are all slackers and/or overworked. :-(
  
  I did see your Stratus (sp?) patch, and it looks harmless and useful.
  I have a lot on at the moment but I don't mind merging it when I or
  somebody else gets a chance.
 
 This might be a good time for tagging 2.5.6 perhaps.  A fair
 number of bugfixes have gone in, popt updates, and a few new
 features.  It has been stable for about 2 months.  Unless

Please apply my IPv6 ACL patch.
This is very important for ipv6-enabled environment.

Index: access.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/apps/rsync/access.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.1.1.1 -r1.4
--- access.c2002/09/06 04:49:10 1.1.1.1
+++ access.c2002/09/20 13:14:13 1.4
@@ -30,54 +30,163 @@
return (fnmatch(tok, host, 0) == 0);
 }
 
+static int match_binary(char *b1, char *b2, char *mask, int addrlen)
+{
+   int i;
+
+   for (i=0; iaddrlen; i++) {
+   if ((b1[i]^b2[i])mask[i]) {
+   return 0;
+   }
+   }
+
+   return 1;
+}
+
+static void make_mask(char *mask, int plen, int addrlen) {
+   int w, b;
 
+   w = plen  3;
+   b = plen  0x7;
+
+   if (w)
+   memset(mask, 0xff, w);
+   mask[w] = 0xff  (0xff(8-b));
+   if (w+1  addrlen)
+   memset(mask+w+1, 0, addrlen-w-1);
+
+   return;
+}
+
 static int match_address(char *addr, char *tok)
 {
char *p;
-   unsigned long a, t, mask = (unsigned long)~0;
+   struct addrinfo hints, *resa, *rest;
+   int gai;
+   int ret = 0;
+   int addrlen = 0;
+#ifdef HAVE_STRTOL
+   long int bits;
+#else
+   int bits;
+#endif
+   char mask[16];
+   char *a = NULL, *t = NULL;
 
if (!addr || !*addr) return 0;
 
-   if (!isdigit(tok[0])) return 0;
-
p = strchr(tok,'/');
if (p) *p = 0;
-
-   a = inet_addr(addr);
-   t = inet_addr(tok);
 
-   if (p) {
-   *p = '/';
-   }
-
-   if (t == INADDR_NONE) {
+   memset(hints, 0, sizeof(hints));
+   hints.ai_family = PF_UNSPEC;
+   hints.ai_socktype = SOCK_STREAM;
+   hints.ai_flags = AI_NUMERICHOST;
+
+   gai = getaddrinfo(addr, NULL, hints, resa);
+   if (gai) return 0;
+
+   gai = getaddrinfo(tok, NULL, hints, rest);
+   if (p)
+   *p++ = '/';
+   if (gai) {
rprintf(FERROR,malformed address %s\n, tok);
+   freeaddrinfo(resa);
return 0;
}
+
+   if (rest-ai_family != resa-ai_family) {
+   ret = 0;
+   goto out;
+   }
 
-   a = ntohl(a);
-   t = ntohl(t);
+   switch(resa-ai_family) {
+   case PF_INET:
+   a = (char *)((struct sockaddr_in *)resa-ai_addr)-sin_addr;
+   t = (char *)((struct sockaddr_in *)rest-ai_addr)-sin_addr;
+   addrlen = 4;
+
+   break;
+
+#ifdef INET6
+   case PF_INET6:
+   {
+   struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6a, *sin6t;
+
+   sin6a = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)resa-ai_addr;
+   sin6t = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)rest-ai_addr;
+
+   a = (char *)sin6a-sin6_addr;
+   t = (char *)sin6t-sin6_addr;
+
+   if (sin6t-sin6_scope_id 
+   sin6a-sin6_scope_id != sin6t-sin6_scope_id) {
+   ret = 0;
+   goto out;
+   }
 
+   a = (char *)sin6a-sin6_addr;
+   t = (char *)sin6t-sin6_addr;
+   addrlen = 16;
+
+   break;
+   }
+#endif
+   default:
+   rprintf(FERROR,unknown family %u\n, rest-ai_family);
+   ret = 0;
+   goto out;
+   }
+
+   bits = -1;
if (p) {
-   if (strchr(p+1,'.')) {
-   mask = inet_addr(p+1);
-   if (mask == INADDR_NONE) {
+   if (inet_pton(resa-ai_addr-sa_family, p, mask) = 0) {
+#ifdef HAVE_STRTOL
+   char *ep = NULL;
+#else
+   unsigned char *pp;
+#endif
+
+#ifdef HAVE_STRTOL
+   bits = strtol(p, ep, 10);
+   if (!*p || *ep) {
rprintf(FERROR,malformed mask in %s\n, tok);
-   return 0;
+   ret = 0;
+   goto out;
+   }
+#else
+   for (pp = (unsigned char *)p; *pp; pp++) {
+   if (!isascii(*pp) || !isdigit(*pp)) {
+   rprintf(FERROR,malformed mask in %s\n, tok);
+

Flaþ!..Flaþ!..Flaþ!.. Dünyanýn Ýlk Astroloji ve Gizli Ýlimler Portalý Açýldý...

2002-11-06 Thread Astromerkez


  

Dünya'nn lk Astroloji
ve Gizli limler Portalwww.astromerkez.com
  
  


Dünya'nn ilk
astroloji portal hizmete girdi. 
Haftalk maç yorumlar,
Bu Haftaki Fener-Galata Derbisinin sonucu
Gündemdeki konular, Deprem, Saddam ve
Sava, Seçimler, AB ve Türkiye'nin gelecei , 
R.Tayyip Erdoan'n ve Deniz Baykal' n astroloji haritalar ve karakter analizleri,

kiiye özel ücretsiz detayl günlük fal hizmeti,

Tüm burçlarn hiçbir yerde bulamayacanz detayl analizleri,

Tüm gizemli limler, Vefk, Remil, Ebced, Havvas,Ledün...

ifal dualar, Duann tesirinin bilimsel açklamas ve yaplan aratrma ve deneyler,


Manyetizma, Durugörü, Astral Seyahat, Meditasyon, Ruhu Bedenden Ayrma..
Ve Daha
Pek Çok Konu
Tüm
Dünya'da ilk defa ve sadece  
www.astromerkez.com
da 

  



--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


offline rsync

2002-11-06 Thread Franco Bagnoli
hello, I'm new to this list. 

here is my question: 

I would like to synchronize two computers (say the home one and the job
one) using zip drives or similar (cdroms, etc), since modem lines are
quite slow and expensive (in Italy). 

I though I could  produce the signature of files on home computer, store
it on a zip, go to job, run rsync to copy the missing or
altered files on the disk (possibly in zipped form) and produce the new
signature file, and repeat it once at home. 

I think this could also be seen as a backup system (on cdrom or
similia).

Is this feasible with rsync? Is there a better approach? 

Thanks. 

-- 
Franco Bagnoli (franchino) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata G. Sansone - Universita' di Firenze
Via S. Marta, 3 I-50139 Firenze, Italy. Tel. +39 0554796422, fax: +39 055471787
GPG Key fingerprint = 169D 9EA5 8FD3 7EDA E43A  9830 255F BCEC 0D63 3728

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



ÓòÃû×¢²á,ÐéÄâÖ÷»ú

2002-11-06 Thread webmaster

Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑ£º
ÄúºÃ£¡
ÕâÊÇÀ´×ÔÏÃÃÅÍòά¿Æ¼¼·¢Õ¹ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾µÄÎʺ¸ÐлÄúÊÕ¿´Õâ·âÓʼþ¡£ÎÒÃÇÕæ³ÏµÄÏ£
ÍûÄúÄܳÉΪÎÒÃÇÔÚ¹óµØÇøµÄÖØÒª»ï°é¡£ÎÒÃÇÊÇÒ»¼ÒÖÂÁ¦ÓÚ»¥ÁªÍøÐÅÏ¢·þÎñ¡¢µç×ÓÉÌÎñ·þ
ÎñºÍÆóÒµÓ¦Ó÷þÎñµÄ¸ßм¼ÊõÆóÒµ¡£ÎÒÃÇÓÐ×ŶàÄê´ÓʲÙ×÷ϵͳµÄ¾­Ñé,ÕâΪÎÒÃǵĿռä
Îȶ¨ÌṩÁ˱£Ö¤.ÎÒÃǵķþÎñ×ÚÖ¼ÊÇ:Îȶ¨Ñ¹µ¹Ò»ÇÐ!ÏêÇéÇëä¯ÀÀ:http://www.onway.net 
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] лл£¡
¡¡ÎÒÃÇΪÄúÌṩµÄÒÔÏÂÍøÕ¾¿Õ¼ä¶¼¿ÉÖ§³ÖÊý¾Ý¿â£¨CGI¡¢PHP¡¢MYSQL¡¢SQL¡¢ACCESS¡¢AS
P¡¢JSP£©£¬È«ÃæÂú×ãÄúµÄÐèÇó¡£Õ⽫»áÊÇÄú³¬ÖµµÄÑ¡Ôñ¡£

 1¡¢30M¿Õ¼ä£«30MÆóÒµÓʾ֣«1¸ö¹ú¼ÊÓòÃû£¬¹¦ÄÜÈ«Ã棬½öÊÛ240Ôª/Äꣻ
 2¡¢60M¿Õ¼ä£«60MÆóÒµÓʾ֣«1¸ö¹ú¼ÊÓòÃû£¬¹¦ÄÜÈ«Ã棬½öÊÛ280Ôª/Äꣻ
 3¡¢120M¿Õ¼ä£«120MÆóÒµÓʾ֣«1¸ö¹ú¼ÊÓòÃû£¬¹¦ÄÜÈ«Ã棬½öÊÛ330Ôª/Äꣻ
 4¡¢200M¿Õ¼ä£¨ÃÀ¹ú£©£«50¸öÓÊÏ䣫1¸ö¹ú¼ÊÓòÃû£¬¹¦ÄÜÈ«Ã棬½öÊÛ880Ôª/Äê¡£

 ¡°Îȶ¨Ñ¹µ¹Ò»ÇС±ÊÇÈ«ÌåÍòάÈ˵ķþÎñ×ÚÖ¼£¬ÎÒÃÇÖ£ÖسÐŵ£º
 1¡¢ÍòάÖ÷»úÈ«²¿²ÉÓÃÔ­×°Dell PowerApp»¥ÁªÍøÓ¦Ó÷þÎñÆ÷£»
 2¡¢ÍòάÖ÷»úÈ«²¿°²×°Õý°æTurbolinux»òMicrosoft²Ù×÷ϵͳ£»
 3¡¢²ÉÓÃÊÀ½ç±ê×¼µÄSNMP½øÐÐ24x7x365 ϵͳ¼à²â£»
 4¡¢ÍòάÖ÷»ú¿Í»§Ò»¸öÔÂÄÚ¿ÉÎÞÌõ¼þÈ«¶îÍ˿ÆäËü°´Êµ¼ÊÓà¶îÍË¿î¡£


 ×££º¿ªÐÄ£¡Ë³Àû£¡

 ÏÃÃÅÍòά¿Æ¼¼·¢Õ¹ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
 µØÖ·£ºÏÃÃÅÊйúó´óÏÃ40²ã
 µç»°:0592-5819328¡¢5815780¡¢5814120
 ´«Õæ:0592-5888462
 
























































---
·ÐµãȺ·¢Óʼþ,À´×ÔÈí¼þ¹¤³Ìר¼ÒÍø(http://www.21cmm.com)

½øCMMÍøУ(http://www.21cmm.com)£¬³ÉÏîÄ¿¹ÜÀíר¼Ò
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Re: offline rsync

2002-11-06 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:14:28AM -0600, Franco Bagnoli wrote:
 hello, I'm new to this list. 
 
 here is my question: 
 
 I would like to synchronize two computers (say the home one and the job
 one) using zip drives or similar (cdroms, etc), since modem lines are
 quite slow and expensive (in Italy). 
 
 I though I could  produce the signature of files on home computer, store
 it on a zip, go to job, run rsync to copy the missing or
 altered files on the disk (possibly in zipped form) and produce the new
 signature file, and repeat it once at home. 
 
 I think this could also be seen as a backup system (on cdrom or
 similia).
 
 Is this feasible with rsync? Is there a better approach? 

Rsync itself, no.

You could probably build something using librsync (another
project).

-- 

J.W. SchultzPegasystems Technologies
email address:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember Cernan and Schmitt
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Re: 2.5.6 release

2002-11-06 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:26:57PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:45:02 -0800), 
jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
 
   I think there really have been no commits since then:
   
 http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/?sortby=date#dirlist
   
   We are all slackers and/or overworked. :-(
   
   I did see your Stratus (sp?) patch, and it looks harmless and useful.
   I have a lot on at the moment but I don't mind merging it when I or
   somebody else gets a chance.
  
  This might be a good time for tagging 2.5.6 perhaps.  A fair
  number of bugfixes have gone in, popt updates, and a few new
  features.  It has been stable for about 2 months.  Unless
 
 Please apply my IPv6 ACL patch.
 This is very important for ipv6-enabled environment.
 

Rsync CVS has been stable for about 2 months.  This appears
to be new functionality.  We make the release and then you
can argue for inclusion in 2.5.7.  This patch has had no
discussion or justification.

Some of us are not familiar with IPv6.  I know i'm not.
Your earlier posting is the first i had heard of an IPv6
ACL.  I've heard of ACLs for filesystems and for system
resources but not for a networking layer such that a normal
networking program would need to know about.

Next time you submit your patch (in it's own thread) please
include a paragraph or two illuminating us IPv4 paupers what
it is.  I'm guessing it does have to do with rsyncd but it
seems odd to me there would be no changes in rsyncd.conf.


-- 

J.W. SchultzPegasystems Technologies
email address:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember Cernan and Schmitt
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Re: offline rsync

2002-11-06 Thread tim . conway
If you can keep two copies of everything, you can use the --write-batch 
and --read-batch (if they work)...
you sync your local mirror, take the batch files to the other system, and 
apply them to both copies there, then work there.  A the end of that run, 
you sync that sessions changes and take those batch files back.  You'll 
have to get them in sync in the first place, and again if you get them out 
of sync.

You mention zip drives...
why not have a drive on each system, and do all your work on one disk?

Also, you mention the cost of modem lines... you can't use a regular voice 
line?

How far apart are these two systems, physically?  Perhaps an 802.11 with 
waveguide antennae solution would give you what you a fast, free, mostly 
secure link.

Tim Conway 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] reorder name and reverse domain 
303.682.4917 office, 303.921.0301 cell 
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC 
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D 
Longmont, CO 80501 
Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, caesupport2 on AIM 
There are some who call me Tim? 




Franco Bagnoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/06/02 09:14 AM

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:offline rsync
Classification: 



hello, I'm new to this list. 

here is my question: 

I would like to synchronize two computers (say the home one and the job
one) using zip drives or similar (cdroms, etc), since modem lines are
quite slow and expensive (in Italy). 

I though I could  produce the signature of files on home computer, store
it on a zip, go to job, run rsync to copy the missing or
altered files on the disk (possibly in zipped form) and produce the new
signature file, and repeat it once at home. 

I think this could also be seen as a backup system (on cdrom or
similia).

Is this feasible with rsync? Is there a better approach? 

Thanks. 

-- 
Franco Bagnoli (franchino) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata G. Sansone - Universita' di Firenze
Via S. Marta, 3 I-50139 Firenze, Italy. Tel. +39 0554796422, fax: +39 
055471787
GPG Key fingerprint = 169D 9EA5 8FD3 7EDA E43A  9830 255F BCEC 0D63 3728

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Re: offline rsync

2002-11-06 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:14:28AM -0600, Franco Bagnoli wrote:
 hello, I'm new to this list. 
 
 here is my question: 
 
 I would like to synchronize two computers (say the home one and the job
 one) using zip drives or similar (cdroms, etc), since modem lines are
 quite slow and expensive (in Italy). 
 
 I though I could  produce the signature of files on home computer, store
 it on a zip, go to job, run rsync to copy the missing or
 altered files on the disk (possibly in zipped form) and produce the new
 signature file, and repeat it once at home. 
 
 I think this could also be seen as a backup system (on cdrom or
 similia).
 
 Is this feasible with rsync? Is there a better approach? 

rdiff, part of librsync. There is also pysync, but it's much slower (but
easier to understand/modify). 

-- 
--
ABO: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info, including pgp key
--
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



spam filter on rsync list

2002-11-06 Thread Martin Pool
#  0.40  0.40  156.153.255.237
#  0.40  0.307692  delivered-to
#  0.40  0.228571  for
#  0.40  0.164948  from
#  0.40  0.116364  lists.samba.org
#  0.40  0.080706  mbp
#  0.40  0.055292  nov
#  0.40  0.037553  palrel12.hp.com
#  0.40  0.025353  postfix
#  0.40  0.017046  received
#  0.40  0.011429  return-path
#  0.40  0.007648  rsync
#  0.40  0.005112  samba.org
#  0.40  0.003414  wed
#  0.40  0.002278  with

In response to rampant abuse, I have installed a new spam filter,
Bogofilter, on the rsync mailing list.  Experiments have indicated
that it should get a smaller rate of false negatives or positives than
the existing system.

If there are any problems, please mail me or the postmaster.

-- 
Martin
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V51.A

2002-11-06 Thread Hobson, Paul
Title: Rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V51.A





Hi


I am trying to compile rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V5.1A


The configure completed sucessfully however the make failed. The following is a copy of the configure and make output. Could you please provide advice as to why this is failing and hopefully resolution.

Just as a matter of comparison - rsync-2.5.4 make also fails, however, rsync-2.4.8 compiled sucessfully on this version of Tru64 5.1A

Thanks
Paul Hobson



phobson@itustb1:-) cd rsync-2.5.5
phobson@itustb1:-) ./configure
configure: Configuring rsync 2.5.5
checking build system type... alphaev67-dec-osf5.1
checking host system type... alphaev67-dec-osf5.1
checking target system type... alphaev67-dec-osf5.1
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking whether to include debugging symbols... yes
checking for remsh... 0
checking for broken largefile support... no
checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no
checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... no
checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no
checking ipv6 stack type... unknown
checking for library containing getaddrinfo... no
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes
checking for library containing opendir... none required
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... no
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking sys/fcntl.h usability... yes
checking sys/fcntl.h presence... yes
checking for sys/fcntl.h... yes
checking sys/select.h usability... yes
checking sys/select.h presence... yes
checking for sys/select.h... yes
checking fcntl.h usability... yes
checking fcntl.h presence... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking sys/unistd.h usability... no
checking sys/unistd.h presence... no
checking for sys/unistd.h... no
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking utime.h usability... yes
checking utime.h presence... yes
checking for utime.h... yes
checking grp.h usability... yes
checking grp.h presence... yes
checking for grp.h... yes
checking compat.h usability... no
checking compat.h presence... no
checking for compat.h... no
checking sys/param.h usability... yes
checking sys/param.h presence... yes
checking for sys/param.h... yes
checking ctype.h usability... yes
checking ctype.h presence... yes
checking for ctype.h... yes
checking for sys/wait.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes
checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes
checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes
checking sys/filio.h usability... no
checking sys/filio.h presence... no
checking for sys/filio.h... no
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/socket.h usability... yes
checking sys/socket.h presence... yes
checking for sys/socket.h... yes
checking sys/mode.h usability... yes
checking sys/mode.h presence... yes
checking for sys/mode.h... yes
checking glob.h usability... yes
checking glob.h presence... yes
checking for glob.h... yes
checking alloca.h usability... yes
checking alloca.h presence... yes
checking for alloca.h... yes
checking mcheck.h usability... no
checking mcheck.h presence... no
checking for mcheck.h... no
checking sys/sysctl.h usability... no
checking sys/sysctl.h presence... no
checking for sys/sysctl.h... no
checking arpa/inet.h usability... yes
checking arpa/inet.h presence... yes
checking for arpa/inet.h... yes
checking arpa/nameser.h usability... yes
checking arpa/nameser.h presence... yes
checking for arpa/nameser.h... yes
checking netdb.h usability... yes
checking netdb.h presence... yes
checking for netdb.h... yes
checking malloc.h usability... yes
checking malloc.h presence... yes
checking for malloc.h... yes
checking for int... yes
checking size of int... 4
checking for long... yes
checking size of long... 8
checking for short... yes
checking size of short... 2
checking for inline... inline
checking return type of signal handlers... void
checking for uid_t in sys/types.h... yes
checking for mode_t... yes
checking for off_t... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking for pid_t... yes
checking type of 

Rsync and CVS

2002-11-06 Thread Daniel Curry
Hello everyone.  

I am curious about setting up a CVS mirror.  I have been told to use rsync, but I am 
unable to find any information on the net on how to set this up.  The master server is 
on a Solaris machine and the slave will be on a linux machine.  It would be nice to 
have bi-directional mirroring, but not a requirement.  Does anyone have any 
suggestions?

Thanks

Daniel Curry
IT Manager
Cariocas
625 Second Street 
Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94107 
ph: 415-348-6516
fx: 415-348-6505 
cell: 510-579-6680

If A equals success, then the formula is: A = X + Y + Z, 
X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. 
  - Albert Einstein

--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



****Business Proposal****

2002-11-06 Thread jmusa4


NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY
NIGERIAN WATER WAYS APAPA,
LAGOS.NIGERIA
CELL PHONE:234-804-213-8559
REPLY TO:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DEAR FRIEND,

YOUR COMPANY'S NAME AND ADDRESS WAS GOTTEN FROM A
BUSINESS DIRECTORY IN MY SEARCH FOR  A WELL KNOWN
BUSINESSMAN WHO HAS NO QUESTIONABLE CHARACTER AND MUST
BE A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN.

AS A MATTER OF FACT, I AM JUSTICE MUSA , A
DIRECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY
(N.E.P.A).  ALSO I WAS PRIVILEGED TO BE A MEMBER OF
TENDER'S BOARD THAT AWARDED AND SUPERVISED THE
EXECUTION OF A MULTIMILLION U.S. DOLLARS CONTRACT IN
1998.  THE CONTRACT  HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND
COMMISSIONED IN AUGUST 1996,AND ORIGINAL CONTRACT
VALUE PAID IN OCTOBER 2000, TO THE FOREIGN FIRM THAT
ACTUALLY EXECUTED THE CONTRACT.

HOWEVER, AS A RESULT OF OVER-INVOICING AND SERIES OF
REVISION CARRIED OUT IN THE COURSE OF THE CONTRACT
EXECUTION, THERE NOW EXISTS A FLOATING SUM OF
US$45.5M(FORTY FIVE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND  U.S
DOLLARS ONLY).  THIS MONEY IS NOW DUE FOR PAYMENT IN
THE GOVERNMENT QUARTERLY PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND WE WISH
TO REMIT THIS FUND INTO YOUR DESIGNATED PERSONAL OR
CORPORATE ACCOUNTS OVERSEAS.

WE SHALL SECURE THE PAYMENT APPROVALS FROM THE
RELEVANT OFFICE/MINISTRIES HERE FOR THE RELEASE OF
THIS CONTRACT SUM IN FAVOUR OF YOUR COMPANY WITH
DOCUMENT AND INFORMATION WE SHALL REQUEST FROM YOU
TOO, WE HAVE NOW CONCLUDED ARRANGEMENTS IN THE CENTRAL
BANK OF NIGERIA TO REMIT THIS MONEY AS SUM REALIZED BY
A COMPANY THROUGH LEGITIMATE MEANS IN NIGERIA.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

THE FUND WILL BE SHARED 35% FOR YOU AND 60% FOR US.
THE  REMAINING  5% TAKES CARE OF ALL INCIDENTAL
EXPENSES.  TO FORMALISE THIS TRANSACTION IN NIGERIA IN
FAVOUR OF YOUR DESIGNATED COMPANY WE REQUIRE
YOUTOFORWARD THE FOLLOWING:

1. AN ASSURANCE OF YOUR ABILITY, WILLINGNESS AND
READINESS TO FULLY CORPORATE WITH US DURING
DISBURSEMENT OVERSEAS AND TO MAINTAIN THE MAXIMUM
CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED IN A BUSINESS OF THIS NATURE
IN ALL  PLACES AT ALL TIMES ON BOTH SIDES.

2. PARTICULARS OF YOUR BANKS INCLUDING NAME OF BANK,
ADDRESS, ACCOUNT NUMBERS, TELEX AND FAX
NUMBERSANDE-MAIL NUMBER OF YOUR BANK.
3.YOUR PRIVATE TELEX, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR
SAFE, QUICK AND EFFECTIVE  COMMUNICATION INCLUDING
HOME AND MOBILE PHONES (IF ANY).

4.WILLINGNESS  READINESS TO ASSIST ME IN PROCURING
RELEVANT DOCUMENTS/APPROVALS.

THIS REMITTANCE IS GUARANTEE IN LESS THAN 14(FOURTEEN)
WORKING DAYS UPON RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE MENTION
PARTICULARS BY FAX, HOWEVER, IT REQUIRES THE HIGHEST
CO-OPERATION,  SERIOUSNESS, MUTUAL TRUST, HONEST
AND STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL ON BOTH SIDES TO AVOID
JEOPARDIZING THE POSITION OF THE OFFICERS WHO ARE TOP
GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONARIES.  ALSO WE WANT TO USE PART OF
OUR PERCENTAGE TO IMPORT ANY QUICK SELLING GOODS WITH
YOUR ASSISTANCE AFTER THE FUND HAS BEENTRANSFERREDINTO
YOUR BANK ACCOUNT.

LOOKING FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU THROUGH MY
TELEPHONE:234-804-213-8559 OR REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BEST REGARD.

JUSTICE MUSA




--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Re: 2.5.6 release

2002-11-06 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $B5HF#1QL@(B
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:47:28 -0800), jw 
schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:

  Please apply my IPv6 ACL patch.
  This is very important for ipv6-enabled environment.
  
 
 Rsync CVS has been stable for about 2 months.  This appears
 to be new functionality.  We make the release and then you
 can argue for inclusion in 2.5.7.  This patch has had no
 discussion or justification.

Are there any feature freeze or code freeze?
Or,... how about put it in patches directory?


 Your earlier posting is the first i had heard of an IPv6
 ACL.  I've heard of ACLs for filesystems and for system
 resources but not for a networking layer such that a normal
 networking program would need to know about.
 
 Next time you submit your patch (in it's own thread) please
 include a paragraph or two illuminating us IPv4 paupers what
 it is.  I'm guessing it does have to do with rsyncd but it
 seems odd to me there would be no changes in rsyncd.conf.

The word ACL could be confusing.

It just add IPv6 support for hosts allow and hosts deny derectives.
For example, 

 hosts allow = :::::::
or
 hosts allow = :::::/64
or
 hosts allow = :::::/:::::

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Re: 2.5.6 release

2002-11-06 Thread jw schultz
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:46:12PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:47:28 -0800), 
jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
 
   Please apply my IPv6 ACL patch.
   This is very important for ipv6-enabled environment.
   
  
  Rsync CVS has been stable for about 2 months.  This appears
  to be new functionality.  We make the release and then you
  can argue for inclusion in 2.5.7.  This patch has had no
  discussion or justification.
 
 Are there any feature freeze or code freeze?
 Or,... how about put it in patches directory?

Things having been stable this is about the most painless
point to do a release.  I don't have control but the patches
dir would be reasonable.

 
  Your earlier posting is the first i had heard of an IPv6
  ACL.  I've heard of ACLs for filesystems and for system
  resources but not for a networking layer such that a normal
  networking program would need to know about.
  
  Next time you submit your patch (in it's own thread) please
  include a paragraph or two illuminating us IPv4 paupers what
  it is.  I'm guessing it does have to do with rsyncd but it
  seems odd to me there would be no changes in rsyncd.conf.
 
 The word ACL could be confusing.
 
 It just add IPv6 support for hosts allow and hosts deny derectives.
 For example, 
 
  hosts allow = :::::::
 or
  hosts allow = :::::/64
 or
  hosts allow = :::::/:::::

Very good.  IPv6 hosts allow/deny specification.

The patch should include documentation additions.

-- 

J.W. SchultzPegasystems Technologies
email address:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember Cernan and Schmitt
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html