Re: selective dirs only
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:16:22PM +1000, Res wrote: Ahh ok, I thought the -r would take care of all files and dirs under it. The -r just gets it going, the exclude * excludes anything that doesn't match something earlier in the list. I personally prefer not to use it in such a situation, I would do this instead: --include=/dir1/ --include=/dir2/ --exclude=/* That way the /* doesn't match anything down inside dir1 or dir2, and thus you don't need all the extra wild-card rules. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: selective dirs only
Hi Wayne, On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Wayne Davison wrote: On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:16:22PM +1000, Res wrote: Ahh ok, I thought the -r would take care of all files and dirs under it. The -r just gets it going, the exclude * excludes anything that doesn't match something earlier in the list. I personally prefer not to use it in such a situation, I would do this instead: --include=/dir1/ --include=/dir2/ --exclude=/* That way the /* doesn't match anything down inside dir1 or dir2, and thus you don't need all the extra wild-card rules. Thanks, thats shortens the command line by half :) -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
REPLY REQUIRED: Confirm subscription to group Knowledge Vision
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], thanks for your interest in the group Knowledge Vision ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). If you would like to accept this invitation, please return this eMail by clicking on reply or subscribe via the Web. http://uk.domeus.com/public/subscribe.jsp?tsp=1055759321051gid=337470uid=22053930sig=BOPFLAMLFHBDOLJPaction=subscribeToSingleGroup If you are not interested in joining, please ignore this eMail and you will receive no further eMails from us. The group owner sends the following welcome message: - Welcome to Knowledge Vision! Our systems and programs can help you to successfully optimize your professional potential in a changing world. To be able to progress efficiently in any area today, we promote new smart working and learning systems through new techniques, tools and methodologies (TTMs) in key Smart Learning Areas: Knowledge Management, Change Management, Quantitative Learning, Qualitative Learning, Skill Management and Business Intelligence. For more information visit our web www.amjsmartlearning.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] - If you would like to use the full range of features, just log in at http://uk.domeus.com using the following log-in information: username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] password: bemiceh4 If your eMail address has been added to this list without your consent and you do not wish to receive eMails from Domeus, please forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that this will disable your eMail address throughout the Domeus system. Best regards, Your Domeus Teamlogo.gifcorner.gif-- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
FW: Rsync issue
I have setup 2 servers with the rsync # /etc/services rsync 6873/tcp# Rsync Server # /etc/inetd.conf rsync stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/bin/rsync rsyncd --daemon Looks like they work internally but not remotely. Please read below the 2 examples This works: bash-2.05$ /usr/local/bin/rsync -avz -e ssh /tmp/5.0 /tmp/5.0 building file list ... done wrote 83428 bytes read 20 bytes 33379.20 bytes/sec total size is 85086768 speedup is 1019.64 ERROR: bash-2.05$ /usr/local/bin/rsync -avz -e ssh /tmp/5.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/5.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165) Could you guys please suggest what this error means? Raj -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Rsync Performance In Windows
Has anyone else experienced high CPU usage when using RSYNC in windows 2000 server? I am using the rsync.exe (and applicable DLL's) from the cygwin installation (I am not however running cygwin on this machine). The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the windows machine, which has a much faster CPU hits a CPU usage of 100%. If anyone else has seen this, and/or can help alleviate the issue, that would be great. I am using rsync to backup across our network our branch file servers. CPU states: 1.5% user, 3.1% system, 0.0% nice, 95.2% idle Mem: 126636K av, 124008K used,2628K free, 0K shrd, 26580K buff Swap: 1020560K av,7360K used, 1013200K free 32044K cached PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 18600 root 15 0 7544 7544 704 R 3.1 5.9 0:05 rsync 18644 root 15 0 1040 1040 832 R 1.1 0.8 0:02 top 18557 root 15 0 1740 1680 1428 S 0.1 1.3 0:00 sshd -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (Broken pipe)
I'm experiencing some unexpected behavior with rsync v2.5.6. After looking around it seems like several people have experienced similar problems in the past, but those appear to be old bugs that are solved now. Also doesn't appear to be any direct bugfixes made for this issue since 2.5.6. The strange thing is that things seem to work when I use ssh for transport. However now I need to switch to using the rsync daemon directly and this problem has arose. I'm pushing local data to a remote rsync backup server: ---[snip]--- # rsync -a -v --modify-window=2 /backup/Source/Dir/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]::backup/dest Password: building file list ... rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes: phase send_file_entry: Broken pipe rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(515) ---[snip]--- With more -v's, I end up with the same message at the end, but it's preceeded by a bunch of lines like this (filenames altered): make_file(3,file1) make_file(3,file2) make_file(3,file3) make_file(3,file4) It stops on the same file each time. I tried deleting this file to see if it's just choking on a particular file (or type of file), but in that case it just chokes on the next file (different type) in the directory. The files in this directory are no bigger than 2MB. If I remove the subdirectory entirely, it still just dies on the next file it encounters. The directories that I'm syncing do have a large number of files, but as I mentioned earlier, it does seem to work when using -e ssh. I do not seem to be running out of memory. I also tried the same parameters but breaking it up into smaller subdirectories, and it still failed after X amount of files with the same error (I did not determine whether or not X is always the same with using other directories). Note that this is always occuring in the building file list stage, and not the actual file transfer. After looking at io.c, it seems like the problem (rather, the symptom) for this error message is a failed write() call (which explains the Broken Pipe message to stderr). I thought maybe --blocking-io would avoid this issue, but it still happened when using --blocking-io. Does anyone have any ideas about what could be causing this? Thanks, - Nate Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Rsync Performance In Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _Chris McKeever_ wrote: The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the windows machine, which has a much faster CPU hits a CPU usage of 100%. rsync CPU usage is not symmetric, this could be normal. But it has spikes of 100% or a continuous use of 100%? Are you working in a local LAN? Is transfer imited by LAN speed? by HDD speed? by CPU speed? In that case, for files not too long, it may be better CPU-wise to use the normal check for date instead of the full block hash checking... - -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPu4fbmiYgizI8lL7EQL0tACgm8hpX0koJl2NNfNA2fq6T36p93oAn0G4 Qq8ID5Wg+cq7BLW4f/u6SWZx =JBLS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You have emailed an address at dslreports.com
Each time I send a message to the ML I receive this message... (thi mislead me to double-post some days ago). Could someone please unsubscribe the blocked address? But I guess that's not possible, as anyone else shuold have noticed this, too... =( -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) ---BeginMessage--- ** This is an automatically generated email ** You have emailed an address at dslreports.com that has been ** closed ** due to vast amounts of ** SPAM ** Never Fear! Please refer to the page: http://www.broadbandreports.com/contacts And/or re-send your message .. (old -- new) ads -- adsales (queries on advertising opportunities) adverts -- adsales (queries on advertising opportunities) ren -- ren_kolka (all email from ISPs) bizdev -- biz_dev (site business development) press -- pressq(press questions on broadband) justin -- justinb Also, for many broadband related questions we receive, you can find the answer online now, using our popular broadband forums: http://www.dslreports.com/forums/all thanks! team dslreports.com -- your original email below - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _Chris McKeever_ wrote: The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the windows machine, which has a much faster CPU hits a CPU usage of 100%. rsync CPU usage is not symmetric, this could be normal. But it has spikes of 100% or a continuous use of 100%? Are you working in a local LAN? Is transfer imited by LAN speed? by HDD speed? by CPU speed? In that case, for files not too long, it may be better CPU-wise to use the normal check for date instead of the full block hash checking... - -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPu4fbmiYgizI8lL7EQL0tACgm8hpX0koJl2NNfNA2fq6T36p93oAn0G4 Qq8ID5Wg+cq7BLW4f/u6SWZx =JBLS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html ---End Message--- -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
RE: Rsync Performance In Windows
Thanks for your response... -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _Chris McKeever_ wrote: The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the windows machine, which has a much faster CPU hits a CPU usage of 100%. rsync CPU usage is not symmetric, this could be normal. But it has spikes of 100% or a continuous use of 100%? as soon as a remote server connects to it, it spikes and sticks at 100% Are you working in a local LAN? yes, connected via point-to=point t-1 lines Is transfer imited by LAN speed? to a degree by HDD speed? by CPU speed? seems on the windows machine it is the CPU In that case, for files not too long, it may be better CPU-wise to use the normal check for date instead of the full block hash checking... I may give the date check a go tonight and see if help remedies the issues. - -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPu4fbmiYgizI8lL7EQL0tACgm8hpX0koJl2NNfNA2fq6T36p93oAn0G4 Qq8ID5Wg+cq7BLW4f/u6SWZx =JBLS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
RE: Rsync Performance In Windows
Lapo - With this: In that case, for files not too long, it may be better CPU-wise to use the normal check for date instead of the full block hash checking... did you mean the -u switch? or something else? -Original Message- From: Chris McKeever Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:03 PM To: 'Lapo Luchini'; _Chris McKeever_; rsync Subject: RE: Rsync Performance In Windows Thanks for your response... -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _Chris McKeever_ wrote: The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the windows machine, which has a much faster CPU hits a CPU usage of 100%. rsync CPU usage is not symmetric, this could be normal. But it has spikes of 100% or a continuous use of 100%? as soon as a remote server connects to it, it spikes and sticks at 100% Are you working in a local LAN? yes, connected via point-to=point t-1 lines Is transfer imited by LAN speed? to a degree by HDD speed? by CPU speed? seems on the windows machine it is the CPU In that case, for files not too long, it may be better CPU-wise to use the normal check for date instead of the full block hash checking... I may give the date check a go tonight and see if help remedies the issues. - -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPu4fbmiYgizI8lL7EQL0tACgm8hpX0koJl2NNfNA2fq6T36p93oAn0G4 Qq8ID5Wg+cq7BLW4f/u6SWZx =JBLS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Trouble rsyncing from Windows to Unix
I'm using Cygwin on Windows which I just downloaded and I'm trying to set up an rsync backup. I'm using an .bat script to copy the files, but it gives the error message: Skipping directory /cygdrive/d/user_dpl Following is the script: @echo off C: C:\cygwin\bin\rsync.exe -e /usr/bin/ssh -l dplbackup /cygdrive/d/user_dpl electric:/raid/backups/dpllaptop I'm confused, since it should not be skipping anything - I no excludes at all. Paul -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
RE: Rsync Performance In Windows
Thanks for your reply! -Original Message- From: Greger Cronquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 2:42 PM To: _Chris McKeever_ Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Rsync Performance In Windows Did you compile from the sources, or did you grab the cygwin binary? I just did the standard install (which I dont think was a full source compile) I suggest you build it from the sources and apply the craigb-perf.diff patch which is in the patches directory in the 2.5.6 distribution. This patch makes all the difference for Windows (system calls cost a lot under cygwin). as I said, I am not running cygwin on that machine, only rsync which I copied from the other cygwin install. Do you suggest that I run cygwin on the windows box that I am using rsync? If you don't want to compile it yourself, I have an older version (2.5.6cvs from august last year, works nicely) available at http://www.niradynamics.se/~nira_greger/ /Greger _Chris McKeever_ wrote: Has anyone else experienced high CPU usage when using RSYNC in windows 2000 server? I am using the rsync.exe (and applicable DLL's) from the cygwin installation (I am not however running cygwin on this machine). The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the windows machine, which has a much faster CPU hits a CPU usage of 100%. If anyone else has seen this, and/or can help alleviate the issue, that would be great. I am using rsync to backup across our network our branch file servers. CPU states: 1.5% user, 3.1% system, 0.0% nice, 95.2% idle Mem: 126636K av, 124008K used,2628K free, 0K shrd, 26580K buff Swap: 1020560K av,7360K used, 1013200K free 32044K cached PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 18600 root 15 0 7544 7544 704 R 3.1 5.9 0:05 rsync 18644 root 15 0 1040 1040 832 R 1.1 0.8 0:02 top 18557 root 15 0 1740 1680 1428 S 0.1 1.3 0:00 sshd -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (Broken pipe)
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:53:04AM -0500, Nate Case wrote: I'm experiencing some unexpected behavior with rsync v2.5.6. After looking around it seems like several people have experienced similar problems in the past, but those appear to be old bugs that are solved now. Also doesn't appear to be any direct bugfixes made for this issue since 2.5.6. The strange thing is that things seem to work when I use ssh for transport. However now I need to switch to using the rsync daemon directly and this problem has arose. I'm pushing local data to a remote rsync backup server: ---[snip]--- # rsync -a -v --modify-window=2 /backup/Source/Dir/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]::backup/dest Password: building file list ... rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes: phase send_file_entry: Broken pipe rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(515) ---[snip]--- With more -v's, I end up with the same message at the end, but it's preceeded by a bunch of lines like this (filenames altered): make_file(3,file1) make_file(3,file2) make_file(3,file3) make_file(3,file4) It stops on the same file each time. I tried deleting this file to see if it's just choking on a particular file (or type of file), but in that case it just chokes on the next file (different type) in the directory. The files in this directory are no bigger than 2MB. If I remove the subdirectory entirely, it still just dies on the next file it encounters. The directories that I'm syncing do have a large number of files, but as I mentioned earlier, it does seem to work when using -e ssh. I do not seem to be running out of memory. I also tried the same parameters but breaking it up into smaller subdirectories, and it still failed after X amount of files with the same error (I did not determine whether or not X is always the same with using other directories). Note that this is always occuring in the building file list stage, and not the actual file transfer. After looking at io.c, it seems like the problem (rather, the symptom) for this error message is a failed write() call (which explains the Broken Pipe message to stderr). I thought maybe --blocking-io would avoid this issue, but it still happened when using --blocking-io. It would seem that the server process (forked off from the daemon) is dying. Look in the rsyncd log file (may be syslog) for clues. -- J.W. SchultzPegasystems Technologies email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember Cernan and Schmitt -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Trouble rsyncing from Windows to Unix
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:18:38PM -0700, Paul English wrote: Skipping directory /cygdrive/d/user_dpl By default rsync skips directories -- see the -r option to override this. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Trouble rsyncing from Windows to Unix
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:18:38PM -0700, Paul English wrote: Skipping directory /cygdrive/d/user_dpl By default rsync skips directories -- see the -r option to override this. ..wayne.. Aah.. thanks. That's a simple one! Paul -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Trouble rsyncing from Windows to Unix
You may have two points of trouble. First, you need to specify something to get it to be recursive. I use -a, which covers most everything. I also use R for relative paths. I think that you might also have trouble with the /usr/bin/ssh -l dplbackup part. Try this: C:\cygwin\bin\rsync.exe -aR -e c:\cygwin\bin\ssh.exe -l dplbackup /cygdrive/d/user_dpl electric:/raid/backups/dpllaptop OR, if you don't do c:\cygwin\bin\ , you might try /cygdrive/c/cygwin/bin/ssh.exe I have never been able to get the -l command to work in Windows, though. Instead, you might try: C:\cygwin\bin\rsync.exe -aR -e c:\cygwin\bin\ssh.exe /cygdrive/d/user_dpl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/raid/backups/dpllaptop Trey Nolen I'm using Cygwin on Windows which I just downloaded and I'm trying to set up an rsync backup. I'm using an .bat script to copy the files, but it gives the error message: Skipping directory /cygdrive/d/user_dpl Following is the script: @echo off C: C:\cygwin\bin\rsync.exe -e /usr/bin/ssh -l dplbackup /cygdrive/d/user_dpl electric:/raid/backups/dpllaptop I'm confused, since it should not be skipping anything - I no excludes at all. Paul -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: You have emailed an address at dslreports.com
On 16 Jun 2003, Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Each time I send a message to the ML I receive this message... (thi mislead me to double-post some days ago). Could someone please unsubscribe the blocked address? But I guess that's not possible, as anyone else shuold have noticed this, too... =( Done. (I saw it too.) -- Martin pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Interactive Rsync Authentication Problem
On 29 May 2003, Andrew Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The getpassphrase() call is identical to getpass() except it returns 256 chars maximum. Of course you would have to mess with autoconf but I don't think that should be too hard. Based on the autoconf stuff in the latest rsync release, the compile check would be something along these lines: AC_CACHE_CHECK([for getpassphrase],rsync_cv_HAVE_GETPASSPHRASE,[ AC_TRY_COMPILE([#include unistd.h], [char *pass; pass = getpassphrase(Password: );], rsync_cv_HAVE_GETPASSPHRASE=yes,rsync_cv_HAVE_GETPASSPHRASE=no)]) if test x$rsync_cv_HAVE_GETPASSPHRASE = xyes; then AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GETPASSPHRASE) fi Can you try that and tell us if it actually works? It's OK if you can't get the autoconf stuff straight, but it would be good to know that getpassphrase() actually solves the problem before worrying. Better yet, send a patch that adds an appropriately-licenced readpassphrase()/getpassphrase() to the lib/ directory? Someone wrote: I love the fact that the man page for getpass() under Linux says don't use this, but does not provide any alternative. Mmmm... Linux - it's so secure! ;-) Solaris fnmatch(ass, hat, 0) used to return true! -- Martin -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: support@microsoft e-mails is a VIRUS
On 20 May 2003, jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anyway you can stop sending these e-mails to everybody on the list? I've received maybe 3 or 4 of them since yesterday. One possible solution to reduce the spam/virus traffic on the list would be to close the list so that only people on the list can send to it. The rsync team has, so far, rejected that approach. We want to keep the list as open as possible. Many people post to the list without subscribing, because it is the main support forum for a product. It is not really closed in the way that a list for a development team is. So there would be a lot of mails blocked. If they're automatically bounced then it is annoying for rsync users. If they're deferred then the delay is annoying, and somebody needs to spend time reading through the queue. At the moment I don't think that would be a good use of time. The only real solution is to send spammers and virus writers to jail. In the mean time we have set up spam and virus filters. As jw says, you are only seeing a small fraction of the literally hundreds of attacks we suffer every day. -- Martin -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Feature request: true multiple sources
On 14 Jun 2003, Gregory Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a big fan of rsync, but the more I use it, the more I
become frustrated at rsync's asymetrical functionality.
For instance, I can do this:
rsync /A/ /B/ desthost:/AB
but not this:
rsync srchost:/A/ srchost:/B/ /AB
rsync allows remote shell wildcards:
rsync 'srchost:/{A,B}/' /AB
The limitations are in your own mind. (Well, at least this one
is. :-)
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Multistreaming rsync
On 10 Feb 2003, Cockram, Michael L (ISI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Newbie here! I am not sure if this is possible or not, but is it possible to multistream the connections that rsync is making? Say I had a directory with a bunch of huge sized files. Is there a way of telling rsync to make multiple connections for different groups of files? Am I making sence? Just run different rsync processes for different subdirectories. There is no support in the program itself. Are there tcp window limitations on rync like ftp has? What do you mean? TCP windows are pretty much invisible to applications. -- Martin -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
CVS update: rsync
Date: Tue Jun 17 04:46:32 2003 Author: mbp Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10975 Modified Files: authenticate.c Log Message: Add a comment about using getpassphrase() or readpassphrase() rather than getpass(). No code change. Revisions: authenticate.c 1.22 = 1.23 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/authenticate.c.diff?r1=1.22r2=1.23 ___ rsync-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync-cvs
