Hello,
I read with interest the mailing list thread found here:
http://marc.10east.com/?t=10716096747&r=1&w=2
We have a "situation" with rsync and --hard-links that was the reason for
my search in MARC's rsync list archive that turned up the thread shown
above. After reading through
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:16:55PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:51:07PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > The question is, should link-dest make the decision based on the
> > source uid/gid or based on the uid/gid the file winds up with.
>
> I think it is sufficient to get t
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:11:04AM -0600, Phil Howard wrote:
> After doing a fresh extraction of the source for 2.6.0, I execute
> ./configure and it enters a loop with no output before or during.
What shell are you using? I'd suggest trying to run it as
"bash configure" and see if that helps.
.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:51:07PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> The question is, should link-dest make the decision based on the
> source uid/gid or based on the uid/gid the file winds up with.
I think it is sufficient to get the link-dest code to figure out if the
file is going to be changed by the
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:55:19PM -0500, Cristian Gafton wrote:
> [...] f_name(file) results in problems handling hardlinks - and
> possibly other issues as well
This is fixed in the CVS version. Feel free to try it out.
For those that don't like to use CVS, you can always rsync the latest
unpa
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> when updating rsync in portage with the 2.6.0 release, i noticed we
> were still applying the proxy auth patch ...
Thanks for the reminder. Martin liked the patch back in early 2002, so
I'm not sure why it didn't make it in back th
After doing a fresh extraction of the source for 2.6.0, I execute ./configure
and it enters a loop with no output before or during. I let run 20 minutes
just to see if it would ever do anything and it did nothing else.
Host system has:
Linux: 2.4.23
Slakcware: 9.0
bash: 2.
